K4YZ wrote:
nobodys old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

Do you recall my comments about your imprecision
with words? You proved it above. See your terms "occoured" and "spliting".

wrong again I simply proved I suffer from Dyslexia and what the doc
termed Dyslexiod aphasia

I used the terms pricisely

No, you did not.

You were IMPRECISE in your use of the words.

Your TYPING errors come from laziness and haste, NOT dyslexia.

precticing med without a license
so flushing the rest

"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...
nobodys old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:


[snip]

I didn't write "for life", Mark. I wrote "in life". Remember, you're
supposed to be the fellow the 248 IQ. The two terms are quite
different.

for life in life there is no difference her thier are in other context

There is absolutely EVERY difference in the context!

but I don't need HF in my or for my life

Obvioulsy that's not true. You've been spanking that monkey in
here for years.

Even Dee Flint while being an elist bitch about a lot of things does
not contend she or anyone is being forced to read my stuff

WHOA! You go on and on about "disagreeing is not lying", etc, and
you call a WOMAN who has NEVER used such language about you a
BITCH...?!?!


A little late there to protest, Steve. He started that several weeks ago.
I simply choose to shun such people.

You need to get knocked off your feet for that one, Markie! And I
mean a solid, blood letting smack in the middle of your greasy face!


He isn't worth the bother.

Considering she ALSO lives in Michigan, and there may very well be
a MR Flint, I'd think that an APOLOGY for the poor choice of adjectives
might be in order!



While there does happen to be a Mr. Flint, I would never permit him to risk
problems for himself over someone like this.


Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

Dee Flint wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...
nobodys old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:


[snip]

I didn't write "for life", Mark. I wrote "in life". Remember, you're
supposed to be the fellow the 248 IQ. The two terms are quite
different.

for life in life there is no difference her thier are in other context

There is absolutely EVERY difference in the context!

but I don't need HF in my or for my life

Obvioulsy that's not true. You've been spanking that monkey in
here for years.

Even Dee Flint while being an elist bitch about a lot of things does
not contend she or anyone is being forced to read my stuff

WHOA! You go on and on about "disagreeing is not lying", etc, and
you call a WOMAN who has NEVER used such language about you a
BITCH...?!?!

A little late there to protest, Steve. He started that several weeks ago.
I simply choose to shun such people.

An apology of my own then, Dee, but as I am sure it's apparent by
the ebb and flow of traffic, I've been busy lately and just plain
missed it...However his conduct was wrong then, it's wrong today.

You need to get knocked off your feet for that one, Markie! And I
mean a solid, blood letting smack in the middle of your greasy face!


He isn't worth the bother.

Hear hear.

Considering she ALSO lives in Michigan, and there may very well be
a MR Flint, I'd think that an APOLOGY for the poor choice of adjectives
might be in order!

While there does happen to be a Mr. Flint, I would never permit him to risk
problems for himself over someone like this.

Bravo, Dee...However I doubt that there is a court in the United
States that would fault a man for blooding the nose of a creep who
defiled his spouse. Similar case occured in Chattanooga a couple years
back..."Case Dismissed" for lack of evidence.

73

Steve, K4YZ

"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...

Dee Flint wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...
nobodys old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:


[snip]

I didn't write "for life", Mark. I wrote "in life". Remember,
you're
supposed to be the fellow the 248 IQ. The two terms are quite
different.

for life in life there is no difference her thier are in other context

There is absolutely EVERY difference in the context!

but I don't need HF in my or for my life

Obvioulsy that's not true. You've been spanking that monkey in
here for years.

Even Dee Flint while being an elist bitch about a lot of things does
not contend she or anyone is being forced to read my stuff

WHOA! You go on and on about "disagreeing is not lying", etc, and
you call a WOMAN who has NEVER used such language about you a
BITCH...?!?!

A little late there to protest, Steve. He started that several weeks
ago.
I simply choose to shun such people.

An apology of my own then, Dee, but as I am sure it's apparent by
the ebb and flow of traffic, I've been busy lately and just plain
missed it...However his conduct was wrong then, it's wrong today.


Yeah I noticed your appearances have been irregular. And I agree that is
conduct is wrong. However, I absolutely refuse to feed his ego and so take
very little notice of his remarks.

Here's an irony for you. He considers Extras to be elitists but is planning
to become one himself as soon as possible after the code testing is dropped!


Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

Dee Flint wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...

cut
Here's an irony for you. He considers Extras to be elitists but is planning
to become one himself as soon as possible after the code testing is dropped!

now alsas you cross the line into Lair or perhaps it is ego manaic

I never said extras are elitists

I said you are

I have said other hams that happen to extras are

but you personalize a coment about yourself to mean what it does not
say


Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

K4YZ wrote:
Dee Flint wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...
nobodys old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
cut

A little late there to protest, Steve. He started that several weeks ago.
I simply choose to shun such people.

An apology of my own then, Dee, but as I am sure it's apparent by
the ebb and flow of traffic, I've been busy lately and just plain
missed it...However his conduct was wrong then, it's wrong today.

meaning you jumped into without bothering to know what you were typing
about and shoot off our keyboard
cut

Bravo, Dee...However I doubt that there is a court in the United
States that would fault a man for blooding the nose of a creep who
defiled his spouse. Similar case occured in Chattanooga a couple years
back..."Case Dismissed" for lack of evidence.

showing of course what we in the north have known for years, thatthe
courts of the south often do not uphold the law

and that they can be pretty brazen about it

73

Steve, K4YZ

an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
Dee Flint wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...
nobodys old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
cut

A little late there to protest, Steve. He started that several weeks ago.
I simply choose to shun such people.

An apology of my own then, Dee, but as I am sure it's apparent by
the ebb and flow of traffic, I've been busy lately and just plain
missed it...However his conduct was wrong then, it's wrong today.

meaning you jumped into without bothering to know what you were typing
about and shoot off our keyboard

Nope.

Meaning your conduct was inappropriate then, it's inappropriate
now, and always WILL be inappropriate.

Bravo, Dee...However I doubt that there is a court in the United
States that would fault a man for blooding the nose of a creep who
defiled his spouse. Similar case occured in Chattanooga a couple years
back..."Case Dismissed" for lack of evidence.

showing of course what we in the north have known for years, thatthe
courts of the south often do not uphold the law

Sure they do.

and that they can be pretty brazen about it

Brazen about upholding their own law...?!?!

You're SUCH an IDIOT, Markie!

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
Dee Flint wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...
nobodys old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
cut

A little late there to protest, Steve. He started that several weeks ago.
I simply choose to shun such people.

An apology of my own then, Dee, but as I am sure it's apparent by
the ebb and flow of traffic, I've been busy lately and just plain
missed it...However his conduct was wrong then, it's wrong today.

meaning you jumped into without bothering to know what you were typing
about and shoot off our keyboard

Nope.

yes meaning you jumped insoemthing without checking your facts

Meaning your conduct was inappropriate then, it's inappropriate
now, and always WILL be inappropriate.

Bravo, Dee...However I doubt that there is a court in the United
States that would fault a man for blooding the nose of a creep who
defiled his spouse. Similar case occured in Chattanooga a couple years
back..."Case Dismissed" for lack of evidence.

showing of course what we in the north have known for years, thatthe
courts of the south often do not uphold the law

Sure they do.

and that they can be pretty brazen about it

Brazen about upholding their own law...?!?!

about not upoholding it

You're SUCH an IDIOT, Markie!

Steve, K4YZ