Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Forget all the "my survey of comments analysis"
is more accurate than yours... Consider the following question/challenge: In all of the procode test arguments and comments has even one NEW reason to retain code testiing been offered? Forget even if such an argument is valid or compelling in any way...I'm looking for any argument not previously raised and dismissed by or in past FCC commentary (NPRMs, R&Os, etc.) My short answer (and I'll be the first to say I haven't read all comments) is that there are no new arguments raised... because if there had been we'd have seen it or them by now. Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Utillity freq List; | Shortwave | |||
DX test Results | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
DX test Results | Broadcasting | |||
DX test Results | Shortwave |