Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Bill Sohl wrote: Forget all the "my survey of comments analysis" is more accurate than yours... Consider the following question/challenge: In all of the procode test arguments and comments has even one NEW reason to retain code testiing been offered? I Havenot seen one But then I make no claim to have read em all (my tolerance for crap ran out too fast) Forget even if such an argument is valid or compelling in any way...I'm looking for any argument not previously raised and dismissed by or in past FCC commentary (NPRMs, R&Os, etc.) Indeed if there was one I suspect it would delay the R&O no matter how of the wall it was My short answer (and I'll be the first to say I haven't read all comments) is that there are no new arguments raised... because if there had been we'd have seen it or them by now. BTW I assmue NCI filed coments Did Carl File under is call (looking for a keyword that will not make me sort through too much else) Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Utillity freq List; | Shortwave | |||
DX test Results | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
DX test Results | Broadcasting | |||
DX test Results | Shortwave |