Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: Dave Heil on Jan 18, 8:26 pm
wrote: Poseurs DO have that problem..."tripping the light fantastic" all the time. You have a point, Leonard. One example would be your involvement in amateur radio. CAN'T YOU GET ANYTHING RIGHT, DAVID D#######? Obviously NOT, judging by trotting out that old sway-backed "involvement" nonsense. Amateurism is NOT a closed community. There are only the close-minded individuals in amateur radio who imagine themselves gods of radio. Listen UP, David. One does NOT have to be "involved" through federal licensing to discuss either radio, licensing, or license testing for amateur radio. The FCC does NOT require any staffer or commissioner to have been granted any amateur radio license in order to MAKE amateur radio regulations OR regulated its use. DISCUSSION of radio regulations is NOT the sole purview of those already licensed...nor are those not licensed in the amateur radio service "forbidden" to speak about it. Kindly DROP your repeated nonsense of control-freakism about "who can discuss what where" in regards to amateur radio. I've been VERY much "involved" with radio for just about 53 years now. Radio. Communications radio. At the professional level, not in some "clubhouse" idea of some backyard amateurs sitting around thinking they were God's Gift to the radio world because they have been granted a federal license to be "hams." When the FCC issues a Memorandum Report and Order stating that ONLY already-licensed radio amateurs are to talk with them about federal regulations, then and ONLY THEN can you have your "wish" of "involvement." Until then, I just say "Phhffftttttt" to your controlling attempts. Phffittttt... |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 04:26:59 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote: wrote: Poseurs DO have that problem..."tripping the light fantastic" all the time. You have a point, Leonard. One example would be your involvement in amateur radio. how is that? Oh I see just lying again Dave K8MN _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 07:43:52 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote: wrote: From: Dave Heil on Jan 18, 8:26 pm wrote: Poseurs DO have that problem..."tripping the light fantastic" all the time. You have a point, Leonard. One example would be your involvement in amateur radio. CAN'T YOU GET ANYTHING RIGHT, DAVID D#######? more censorsorship more forgery dave Obviously NOT, judging by trotting out that old sway-backed "involvement" nonsense. Amateurism is NOT a closed community. I didn't write of "amateurism" sure did you did in a amteur fashion as well , Len. I wrote of amateur radio. Amateur radio is most assuredly a closed community in that only those who have passed licensing exams may participate. Bull****, plain and simple You have not done so and you may not participate. showing your colours again and quite plainly you want to restrict the ARS to those you approve of _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 04:26:59 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Poseurs DO have that problem..."tripping the light fantastic" all the time. You have a point, Leonard. One example would be your involvement in amateur radio. how is that? How is it? Leonard H. Anderson is not now, nor has he ever been a participant in amateur radio. Oh I see just lying again Please do me the favor of pointing out, if it is within your capabilities, any statement I've made in my post which is an untruth. Use some of that vaunted IQ. Dave K8MN |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 07:43:52 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: wrote: From: Dave Heil on Jan 18, 8:26 pm wrote: Poseurs DO have that problem..."tripping the light fantastic" all the time. You have a point, Leonard. One example would be your involvement in amateur radio. CAN'T YOU GET ANYTHING RIGHT, DAVID D#######? more censorsorship more forgery dave Excuse me, Colonel. You seem to be in over your head. Please point to any portion of Len's post which I altered in any way. Obviously NOT, judging by trotting out that old sway-backed "involvement" nonsense. Amateurism is NOT a closed community. I didn't write of "amateurism" sure did you did in a amteur fashion as well That is incorrect. I did not mention "amateurism", nor did I post in an "amteur" fashion. , Len. I wrote of amateur radio. Amateur radio is most assuredly a closed community in that only those who have passed licensing exams may participate. Bull****, plain and simple That's what you've posted alright. I'm sure that you can quote an applicable regulation which permits operation of an amateur radio station by unlicensed persons. You have not done so and you may not participate. showing your colours again and quite plainly I show my colors every single time I post. So, might I add, do you. you want to restrict the ARS to those you approve of How is my statement that Leonard Anderson is not a participant in amateur radio a restriction? He has the same opportunity as anyone else to obtain a license. He is prevented from doing so only by inertia. Dave K8MN |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: K4YZ on Jan 19, 3:05 am
wrote: Even more basic than that, though, is Dudly's FAILURE to produce ONE item, documentary or from anyone else, of his vaunted "active military service in the USMC." Sorry, Lennie. A LIE on your part. I've produced NUMEROUS references to verifyable third-party sources of my service. Tsk, tsk, tsk, trying to perpetuate your own LIE by calling others "liars?" :-) 1. Not a single DD-214 copy anywhere of yours to be seen. 2. Not a single military document copy of yours to be seen. 3. Not a single individual's reference to attest to your having been on active USMC duty at any time during your claimed 18-year active duty. 4. Not a single photograph, snapshot, or other memento of yours to be seen from your "18-year USMC active duty." 5. Not a single newspaper or other periodical copy to state of your having entered the USMC, left the USMC, or even served in any capacity on active duty to be seen. 6. Your constant use of wrong terms and jargon in use by the USMC is indicative of NOT being ON active duty. 7. Your failure to know of ANY USMC avionics equipment by either nomenclature or familiar name is indicative of NOT being involved with such electronic equipment. All of which points to YOU lying about it. No "lie" if there is nothing at all to attest to your USMC service visible to others. All we have is YOUR claims to the fact. That's why I can say "Leonard H Anderson is a know liar and deceiver" in a public forum and not have to worry about getting sued. Is there some civil suit upcoming involving you? :-) I don't "LIE" in a public forum such as this. I've given enough references on my military service and my (much-longer) civilian career in radio-electronics...including several personal references who are licensed radio amateurs, one of which served with me in the same Army unit at the same time. The Pacific edition of the Stars and Stripes military newspaper carried my interview on Hardy Barracks in Tokyo in the 50s, including my own photos of that time. [one of those in one photo was Stan Peschel, died about a year ago according to industry association news] Frankie's done nothing except try to bark loud and hope no one notices that he's just a shivvering little lap dog without the resources to live up to his bark. Tsk, tsk, tsk...looking in your own mirror again? :-) Frank Gilliland has provided several references, mostly photos of his USMC service time (good ones), including a digitization of a telephone coin used in a foreign country...something that would be familiar to anyone using the same sort of coin. The part of his DD-214 is certainly a reference, something which you do NOT have visible to anyone. Frank has "told it like it is" in detail, regardless of the situations he found himself in and makes no moral judgement on anyone else. You, on the other hand, have yet to PROVE you've actually been on active USMC duty in any way. And that's why I can say Frank Gilliland is a liar and deceiver in a public forum and not be concerned about law suits either. He'd never be able to demonstrate otherwise. "Dudly's done nothing except try to bark loud and hope no one notices that he's just a shivvering little lap dog without the resources to live up to his bark." Tsk, tsk, all that "law suit" talk again! :-) Seems to everyone else that Frank Gilliland can certainly prove HIS USMC service by enough references and links given in this public forum. "We" have seen nothing comparable to yours. As to "working in Marine avionics," Dud has NEVER mentioned a single nomenclature or familiar name of ANY piece of avionics equipment used on USMC helos or any other aircraft. That's an unheard of thing with those who've been IN ACTUAL work on those aircraft. Why? To prove you were actually involved with such avionics work. Unless you care to discuss the CONVERSION of those devices to Amateur use, there's not a bit of need to do so. In other words, YOU DON'T KNOW THE STUFF. :-) You are trying to make excuses for NOT being familiar with any of that equipment. Very transparent. I COULD run off at the mouth ala-Lennie with nomenclatures, manfacturers, etc, but it means nothing. "It means nothing" because you CANNOT do so. :-) After years of working with such equipment you CANNOT remember a single name? You cannot get the crypto terms correct...even though encryption is definitely a no-no in amateur radio use. You've never worked with such equipment, something clearly evident in NOT mentioning names or terms. Well, there you go with half-baked "quotes" and innuendo as if you'd not been given the details before...Or as if all of the information isn;t on my QRZ "Bio" under K4YZ...Again, all information that can be verified and corroborated by the authorizing agencies. WHAT "agencies?" Verification by "call the VA?" :-) Just digitize your latest DD-214, black out your SSN, and make that image available to all via a link somewhere...or by e-mail attachment. Everyone who was actually IN the military of the USA got a DD-214. Those who don't have one now can get a copy from NARA (National Archives and Records Administration) in St. Louis. A copy can be obtained via e-mail now...but the requestor must supply his/her own SSN and (if applicable) their service serial number. So is "liar", but you seem to wear it like the Congressional Medal, Lennie. I don't "LIE," Dudly. Don't have to. We could show YOUR "good side" of professional electronic engineering, but hey, YOU have already done if for us! No, not for "professional electronic engineering." Few in here are involved in that. You certainly have NOT been involved in that. I am a Life Member of the IEEE, a professional organization. The IEEE has a Code of Ethics regarding electronics (and electric) engineering and I follow that. A person is not a liar unless they are NOT telling the truth. Dudly is, "by NOT telling the truth," claiming fradulent service with the USMC. Dudly only CLAIMS to have done things, has presented NO evidence or references of any kind to corroborrate his claims. YOU have been found NOT telling the truth on occassions far too numerous to count. "occasion." [get your S out of there...] Tsk, tsk, tsk, Dudly makes a LIE in that statement. Another "mirror syndrome" activity of Dudly: Try to misdirect by calling his challengers as "liars." Typical, but NOT a "reply" to anything. And Leonard H. Anderson has, once AGAIN, demonstrated that he is an intentionally deceitful old putz who's weak minded, cowardly and without any redeeming virtue. Personal insults are NOT "replies." If Dudly wants to be believed, he needs only to supply some evidence of his claims. So far he has not done so, just weasel-wording some generalities and giving alleged references that cannot be obtained by the public. A DD-214 copy image would be a start. Just HOW does Mrs Lennie sleep in all that stench...?!?! Putz. Refraining from those constant personal insults would be another good start in showing the world what an amateur extra class license can be. So far, there hasn't been much good shown by yourself as a "representative" "involved" "participating" radio amateur. Get some mental health counseling soon. It would benefit everyone. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Care To Try Again, Steve? | Policy | |||
Serious radiation questin | Antenna | |||
Cry On Your Ass Juice Stained Pillow, Steve | CB | |||
Totally ticked. | Policy | |||
Steve Howe Joins The Gagliarchives Saturday Night | Broadcasting |