RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Radio Photos (https://www.radiobanter.com/radio-photos/)
-   -   Victor portable stereopticon (https://www.radiobanter.com/radio-photos/122043-victor-portable-stereopticon.html)

Ken G. June 24th 07 04:45 PM

Victor portable stereopticon
 
Anyone know about this ? i checked ebay for any and found none accept
the old wood ones . This one is electric & pat. dates of 1913 & 1914 .
Cant say i ever seen one before .

Looks like that thing that landed on Gilligans island



FanJet June 24th 07 05:00 PM

Victor portable stereopticon
 

"Ken G." wrote in message
...
Anyone know about this ? i checked ebay for any and found none accept
the old wood ones . This one is electric & pat. dates of 1913 & 1914 .
Cant say i ever seen one before .

Looks like that thing that landed on Gilligans island


dynamotor?



t.hoehler June 24th 07 06:49 PM

Victor portable stereopticon
 

"Ken G." wrote in message
...
Anyone know about this ? i checked ebay for any and found none accept
the old wood ones . This one is electric & pat. dates of 1913 & 1914 .
Cant say i ever seen one before .

Looks like that thing that landed on Gilligans island

Looks like my grandpa's slide projector, aka "magic lantern"

Regards,
Tom



William Sommerwerck[_2_] June 24th 07 07:28 PM

Victor portable stereopticon
 
It's definitely a slide projector, but not a stereopticon. The two slots
permit seemless switching between slides -- not 3D projection.



William Sommerwerck[_2_] June 24th 07 07:40 PM

Victor portable stereopticon
 
It's definitely a slide projector, but not a stereopticon. The two slots
permit seemless switching between slides -- not 3D projection.


Uh... seamless.



Neil S June 24th 07 11:34 PM

Victor portable stereopticon
 
Hardly seamless. It would just show slides as a series, sliding back and
forth and changing the one out of the gate. Seamless is more a 'dissolve'
between images.

Neil S.

"William Sommerwerck" wrote in message
. ..
It's definitely a slide projector, but not a stereopticon. The two slots
permit seemless switching between slides -- not 3D projection.





Ken G. June 25th 07 02:27 AM

Victor portable stereopticon
 
I dont know how clear this picture is to PC`s but it says its a
``stereopticon``



Randy or Sherry Guttery June 25th 07 03:05 AM

Victor portable stereopticon
 
Ken G. wrote:
I dont know how clear this picture is to PC`s but it says its a
``stereopticon``


The sound of people chewing leather is delightful!
--
randy guttery

A Tender Tale - a page dedicated to those Ships and Crews
so vital to the United States Silent Service:
http://tendertale.com

Ken G. June 25th 07 05:19 AM

Victor portable stereopticon
 
You lost me there Randy/Sherry .


William Sommerwerck[_2_] June 25th 07 12:57 PM

Victor portable stereopticon
 
I dont know how clear this picture is to PC`s
but it says its a ``stereopticon``


The sound of people chewing leather is delightful!



I never said I would eat my shoe if it weren't a stereopticon!

Despite the label, it's not a stereopticon, any more than putting a "fruit
bat" label on a hog makes it a fruit bat.

Then again... I just got the OED on CD, so I decided to look up
"stereopticon". It says...

"A double magic lantern arranged to combine two images of the same object or
scene upon a screen, so as to produce the appearance of solidity as in a
stereoscope; also used to cause the image of one object or scene to pass
gradually into that of another with dissolving effect."

So this might very well be a stereopticon -- or at least half of one. How
the dissolving effect would have been achieved was not clear. (Nor is it
clear -- other than the use of colored filters on the projector and over the
viewers eyes, how a 3D image would have been viewed. Polaroid wasn't
invented until the 1930s.)

I looked up "stereoscope" and discovered this...

"An instrument for obtaining, from two pictures (usually photographs) of an
object, taken from slightly different points of view (corresponding to the
positions of the two eyes), a single image giving the impression of solidity
or relief, as in ordinary vision of the object itself.

"In the original form of the instrument (name="1"reflecting stereoscope),
invented by Wheatstone, the images were combined by means of mirrors placed
at a suitable angle; the common form (name="2"refracting or
name="3"lenticular stereoscope), invented afterwards by Brewster, has two
tubes each containing a lens, through which the two pictures are viewed by
the corresponding eyes."

I (and I think most people) had called stereoscopes "stereopticons". Hence
my confusion. You learn something new every day.




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com