![]() |
Design help: Modulator schematic
Reference "Design Help" thread in rar+p Thanks for any advice you may have. -- Say no to institutionalized interference. Just say NO to HD/IBOC! |
Design help: Modulator schematic
"Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... Reference "Design Help" thread in rar+p Thanks for any advice you may have. Just noticed I forgot to draw in the caps across the diodes in the schematic. There is a .047/630V cap across each diode. |
Design help: Modulator schematic
As others in the other group have mentioned, you're pushing your luck with
600V diodes. They have over 700V on them (or they would have if things were working right). Replace them with 1000V diodes. This also means you need to replace those capacitors with 1000V capacitors, preferably AC rated. As someone else said, you have a major problem with the power supply. The output voltage should be much higher. -- Jim Mueller To get my real email address, replace wrongname with eportiz. Then replace nospam with sacbeemail. "Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... "Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... Reference "Design Help" thread in rar+p Thanks for any advice you may have. Just noticed I forgot to draw in the caps across the diodes in the schematic. There is a .047/630V cap across each diode. |
Design help: Modulator schematic
"Jim Mueller" wrote in message ... As others in the other group have mentioned, you're pushing your luck with 600V diodes. They have over 700V on them (or they would have if things were working right). Replace them with 1000V diodes. This also means you need to replace those capacitors with 1000V capacitors, preferably AC rated. As someone else said, you have a major problem with the power supply. The output voltage should be much higher. -- I think I have kenned out what that problem IS. It's not a 250-0-250.. it's a 125-0-125 on the secondary.. which would output pretty much what I'm getting. |
Design help: Modulator schematic
"Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... "Jim Mueller" wrote in message ... As others in the other group have mentioned, you're pushing your luck with 600V diodes. They have over 700V on them (or they would have if things were working right). Replace them with 1000V diodes. This also means you need to replace those capacitors with 1000V capacitors, preferably AC rated. As someone else said, you have a major problem with the power supply. The output voltage should be much higher. -- I think I have kenned out what that problem IS. It's not a 250-0-250.. it's a 125-0-125 on the secondary.. which would output pretty much what I'm getting. This is my transformer. From Mouser http://www.hammondmfg.com/pdf/5c0030.pdf #261G6 261G6 45250V C.T.@ 130 ma 6.3V @ 2A 1 4.00 2.50 2.63 3.56 2.0 |
Design help: Modulator schematic
"Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... "Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... "Jim Mueller" wrote in message ... As others in the other group have mentioned, you're pushing your luck with 600V diodes. They have over 700V on them (or they would have if things were working right). Replace them with 1000V diodes. This also means you need to replace those capacitors with 1000V capacitors, preferably AC rated. As someone else said, you have a major problem with the power supply. The output voltage should be much higher. -- I think I have kenned out what that problem IS. It's not a 250-0-250.. it's a 125-0-125 on the secondary.. which would output pretty much what I'm getting. change it to a bridge rectifier across the whole 250V winding, and everything should work fine! This is my transformer. From Mouser http://www.hammondmfg.com/pdf/5c0030.pdf #261G6 261G6 45250V C.T.@ 130 ma 6.3V @ 2A 1 4.00 2.50 2.63 3.56 2.0 |
Design help: Modulator schematic
"maxhifi" wrote in message news:U5fsi.22399$_d2.19727@pd7urf3no... change it to a bridge rectifier across the whole 250V winding, and everything should work fine! *repeatedly kicks self in arse for not thinking of that in the first place.... * It did clear up almost every issue I was having. Next thing I think I'll do is add negative feedback. |
Design help: Modulator schematic
"Brenda Ann" wrote As others in the other group have mentioned, you're pushing your luck with 600V diodes. They have over 700V on them (or they would have if things were working right). Replace them with 1000V diodes. This also means you need to replace those capacitors with 1000V capacitors, preferably AC rated. As someone else said, you have a major problem with the power supply. The output voltage should be much higher. -- I think I have kenned out what that problem IS. It's not a 250-0-250.. it's a 125-0-125 on the secondary.. which would output pretty much what I'm getting. This is my transformer. From Mouser http://www.hammondmfg.com/pdf/5c0030.pdf #261G6 261G6 45250V C.T.@ 130 ma 6.3V @ 2A 1 4.00 2.50 2.63 3.56 2.0 What is the modulation transformer you're using? If it's a mains transformer it could be going into saturation. Proper modulation transformers are designed to accomodate a d.c. bias through the windings which normally requires an airgap in the core. In an ungapped core the dc bias will drive the core somewhere up the BH curve and the effects will be exactly as you describe - clipping on one of the peaks |
Design help: Modulator schematic
Brenda Ann,
There are several ways to go here. First, the specs for the modulation transformer- impedance, watts, and if it is for push-pull or single-ended. From that, we can get the right tubes, maybe a pair of 6V6 or 6AQ5. Those tubes are happy with 185 volts. If your modulation transformer can use the 6L6, you can easily change the power supply circuit to a "Full Wave Voltage Doubler" and I can e-mail the RCA circuit. Is this circuit designed so the current for the 6L6 and the current for the transmitter tube are on separate windings that cancel each other out? The transmitter may be a bigger headache than the modulator, and this power transformer may limit the choices, as it is small. Don As someone else said, you have a major problem with the power supply. The output voltage should be much higher. I think I have kenned out what that problem IS. It's not a 250-0-250.. it's a 125-0-125 on the secondary.. which would output pretty much what I'm getting. This is my transformer. From Mouser http://www.hammondmfg.com/pdf/5c0030.pdf #261G6 261G6 45250V C.T.@ 130 ma 6.3V @ 2A 1 4.00 2.50 2.63 3.56 2.0 What is the modulation transformer you're using? If it's a mains transformer it could be going into saturation. Proper modulation transformers are designed to accomodate a d.c. bias through the windings which normally requires an airgap in the core. In an ungapped core the dc bias will drive the core somewhere up the BH curve and the effects will be exactly as you describe - clipping on one of the peaks |
Design help: Modulator schematic
What is the modulation transformer you're using?
If it's a mains transformer it could be going into saturation. Proper modulation transformers are designed to accomodate a d.c. bias through the windings which normally requires an airgap in the core. In an ungapped core the dc bias will drive the core somewhere up the BH curve and the effects will be exactly as you describe - clipping on one of the peaks I don't have exact specs on it. It's a Stancor, an actual modulation transformer with isolated secondary so that the RF final could be run off a different B+ supply if desired. I bought the transformer from a ham who had pulled it from an AM rig that used sweep tube outputs, and he had assured me that the match to a 6L6 would be good on both primary and secondary. Perhaps I can get a mH reading on it with my LCR meter, and someone can do the math for me.. I haven't used that math in many many years, and it's left me, I'm afraid. |
Design help: Modulator schematic
Brenda Ann wrote:
It's a Stancor, Have a number? some of us have old references that might list the specs... best regards... -- randy guttery A Tender Tale - a page dedicated to those Ships and Crews so vital to the United States Silent Service: http://tendertale.com |
Design help: Modulator schematic
"Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... "maxhifi" wrote in message news:U5fsi.22399$_d2.19727@pd7urf3no... change it to a bridge rectifier across the whole 250V winding, and everything should work fine! *repeatedly kicks self in arse for not thinking of that in the first place.... * It did clear up almost every issue I was having. Next thing I think I'll do is add negative feedback. you can also delete the capacitor feeding the grid of the second half of the 12AT7 - the one on the plate of the first half is already blocking DC. |
Design help: Modulator schematic
1 Attachment(s)
"Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... "maxhifi" wrote in message news:U5fsi.22399$_d2.19727@pd7urf3no... change it to a bridge rectifier across the whole 250V winding, and everything should work fine! *repeatedly kicks self in arse for not thinking of that in the first place.... * It did clear up almost every issue I was having. Next thing I think I'll do is add negative feedback. Before you do this, I have redrawn your schematic - I added and changed some components which I think might work a little bit better. |
Design help: Modulator schematic
You can also delete the capacitor feeding the grid of
the second half of the 12AT7 -- the one on the plate of the first half is already blocking DC. I was going to suggest that, then realized it was part of the biasing. Which you have altered in the following schematic. I'm curious though, why anyone would design the circuit as it is, when electrolytic caps are relatively cheap. |
Design help: Modulator schematic
"Timothy Twerp was most astounded
When what he thought was -- wasn't grounded. In fact, one could say he was really transfixed With his thumb on pin 3 of a live 6L6." Carl Kohler, ca 1958 |
Design help: Modulator schematic
"William Sommerwerck" wrote in message
... You can also delete the capacitor feeding the grid of the second half of the 12AT7 -- the one on the plate of the first half is already blocking DC. I was going to suggest that, then realized it was part of the biasing. Which you have altered in the following schematic. Sorry for an ignorant question, but can you please explain how it works? As drawn, I can't understand how the tube is biased properly, in either section - won't the grid at zero volts, and the cathode at zero volts set the tube to an undesierable operating point, or is there something here I am missing? I'm curious though, why anyone would design the circuit as it is, when electrolytic caps are relatively cheap. |
Design help: Modulator schematic
"maxhifi" wrote in message news:8ezsi.26512$fJ5.13616@pd7urf1no... "William Sommerwerck" wrote in message ... You can also delete the capacitor feeding the grid of the second half of the 12AT7 -- the one on the plate of the first half is already blocking DC. I was going to suggest that, then realized it was part of the biasing. Which you have altered in the following schematic. Sorry for an ignorant question, but can you please explain how it works? As drawn, I can't understand how the tube is biased properly, in either section - won't the grid at zero volts, and the cathode at zero volts set the tube to an undesierable operating point, or is there something here I am missing? Just clarify my question - I do understand grid leak biasing, but how is it possible with the compnent values given in the original schematic? In an AA5 the grid resistor is in the M ohms I'm curious though, why anyone would design the circuit as it is, when electrolytic caps are relatively cheap. |
Design help: Modulator schematic
"Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... What is the modulation transformer you're using? If it's a mains transformer it could be going into saturation. Proper modulation transformers are designed to accomodate a d.c. bias through the windings which normally requires an airgap in the core. In an ungapped core the dc bias will drive the core somewhere up the BH curve and the effects will be exactly as you describe - clipping on one of the peaks I don't have exact specs on it. It's a Stancor, an actual modulation transformer with isolated secondary so that the RF final could be run off a different B+ supply if desired. I bought the transformer from a ham who had pulled it from an AM rig that used sweep tube outputs, and he had assured me that the match to a 6L6 would be good on both primary and secondary. Perhaps I can get a mH reading on it with my LCR meter, and someone can do the math for me.. I haven't used that math in many many years, and it's left me, I'm afraid. Not withstanding the other suggestions, you may also want to try swapping the connections on the modulation transformer - see attached sketch. Figure 1 gives the worst case condition when both Modulator and PA dc bias currents add to increase core flux density. In Figure 2 the dc bias currents are opposing and help and reduce the flux levels in the core. Also I would very much recommend putting resistors and decoupling capacitors in the cathodes of all stages - particularly if you do use a bridge rectifier to increase the B+ supply voltage as suggested. See maxhifi's sketch newamp.jpg for details. Just a final thought - is the modulation transformer intended for single ended or push pull operation? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:06 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com