![]() |
|
New Program
Evening,
I wrote a new program for the Inland Empire east of LA using the Winscan 2.10. I have all the Railroads, CHiPs and local fire, some of the PD's that are not "trunked" and most of the aircraft freq.'s plus the "High Desert" freg's so I can listen on my way to and from home. I'm happy with the way it is working right now and as I find more freq.'s I'll add them. I picked up most of the major stuff as I came from Kern County to this area. I used my Magnet Mount on my pickup and am using the "rubber ducky" in my travel trailer right now. I'll bring a Scantanna down with me next week and things should work a lot better. I also have a AN-1 Sony for my YB400 that I use down here. I have everything running off the 12v battery to cut down on noise. Burr |
Dwayne wrote: So did you write a new program or did you just make winscam frequency file? Well, guess I just wrote a Winscan frequency file and am running it both as stan alone in the BC 245 and with my PC Laptop as a monitor of what's happening. Are you the person that loves Winscan so mush, got it all figured out and running it everyday. It sure is a nice program and it runs real well, I just love running it!! Burr |
In article ,
says... Dwayne wrote: So did you write a new program or did you just make winscam frequency file? Well, guess I just wrote a Winscan frequency file and am running it both as stan alone in the BC 245 and with my PC Laptop as a monitor of what's happening. Are you the person that loves Winscan so mush, got it all figured out and running it everyday. It sure is a nice program and it runs real well, I just love running it!! Burr I cant stand winscan. No support from the company and it uses almost 100% of your cpu. Best I found so far for the 245 is bc245int, and its free. -- Dwayne http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BC895/ |
Dwayne wrote: I cant stand winscan. No support from the company and it uses almost 100% of your cpu. Best I found so far for the 245 is bc245int, and its free. Something is a little wrong here. I am running five programs right now and they are all running very fast and I have no crashes. Also I have had email support from Winscan and I also could have called if needed, I sent you their phone number last year so what you say most of the time is a lot of bull from someone who can't manage a program on an old computer that is setup wrong or is just so messed up it won't run! Maybe you should think and about a new computer (386 went out years ago) and then learn how to use this an other programs. Maybe you could also learn how to type your email address so people can write or reply to you. Burr |
In article ,
says... Something is a little wrong here. I am running five programs right now and they are all running very fast and I have no crashes. LOL I and everyone that has tried winscam knows your full of it. I never said that it crashes I just said it uses almost 100% of your cpu. Also I have had email support from Winscan and I also could have called if needed, You could have but you would have never heard back from them. I sent you their phone number last year You did no such thing so what you say most of the time is a lot of bull from someone who can't manage a program on an old computer that is setup wrong or is just so messed up it won't run! Maybe you should think and about a new computer (386 went out years ago) and then learn how to use this an other programs. My Athlon XP Barton 3000 with 2 gig of ram is far from a 386. Its not like winscam is hard to use. Hell you must have figured it out so it has to be easy. Maybe you could also learn how to type your email address so people can write or reply to you. I dont care to have morons like you sending me email. Anyway, what the hell is your problem? Do you really care if I and most people dont like a program that you use? Or is it the fact that you said you wrote a new program when in fact you just made a frequency file(big deal people do it every day). I love a good flame war so I'll keep on going if you want. -- Dwayne http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BC895/ |
I agree Burr. I've had nothing but good luck with Winscan. I don't think I
have ever had it crash and as far as processor usage, right now I've got Outlook Express and Winscan open and I'm only using 28% of my CPU. I have to say that I think it also really adds to the enjoyment of scanning. Chris... "Burr" wrote in message ... Dwayne wrote: So did you write a new program or did you just make winscam frequency file? Well, guess I just wrote a Winscan frequency file and am running it both as stan alone in the BC 245 and with my PC Laptop as a monitor of what's happening. Are you the person that loves Winscan so mush, got it all figured out and running it everyday. It sure is a nice program and it runs real well, I just love running it!! Burr |
Dwayne,
Why don't you just say "I don't like Winscan" and let it go at that!! Why bad mouth someone's stuff just because you are having bad luck with it. Some people like it and some don't. Yes, I did send you their new number where they moved last year and they posted right here on this news group about their programs. Now lets let it rest, maybe we'll both re-think our words. Burr |
In article ,
says... Dwayne, Why don't you just say "I don't like Winscan" and let it go at that!! Why bad mouth someone's stuff just because you are having bad luck with it. Some people like it and some don't. Yes, I did send you their new number where they moved last year and they posted right here on this news group about their programs. Now lets let it rest, maybe we'll both re-think our words. Burr Burr your the one that started bashing me here. All I said is that I don't like it and you start calling me stupid and saying I got a junk computer. You NEVER sent me the number because I just started using this name about a month or so ago so you don't even know who I am. Oh one more thing. After going through all your old post about winscan, did it really take you 16 hours to learn how to use it? If it did I feel sorry for you because winscan is one of the most simplist programs to use. I -- Dwayne http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BC895/ |
That phone number from last year is no longer working!! and this is right
off there web-site: "Technical support is currently available through E-Mail based support only. (Retail and Shareware Versions)" They do not have a phone number or street address listed anywhere on there web-site... That alone should send up 50 red flags... but to each his own if it works for you and you like it keep on trucking. It did not run on anything we installed it on. Burr wrote in : Dwayne wrote: I cant stand winscan. No support from the company and it uses almost 100% of your cpu. Best I found so far for the 245 is bc245int, and its free. Something is a little wrong here. I am running five programs right now and they are all running very fast and I have no crashes. Also I have had email support from Winscan and I also could have called if needed, I sent you their phone number last year so what you say most of the time is a lot of bull from someone who can't manage a program on an old computer that is setup wrong or is just so messed up it won't run! Maybe you should think and about a new computer (386 went out years ago) and then learn how to use this an other programs. Maybe you could also learn how to type your email address so people can write or reply to you. Burr -- That Other George Please send your spam to: http://webpages.charter.net/moment/ http://webpages.charter.net/moment/winjunk.htm |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:44 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com