Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Going to have one to two antennas up on a mast feeding several (or more)
scanners down below. Looking for an effective way to split + amplify the signals so each scanner thinks its got its own antenna. I am pretty new to this and would appreciate any advice. Thanks. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jason Wagner" wrote in message ... Going to have one to two antennas up on a mast feeding several (or more) scanners down below. Looking for an effective way to split + amplify the signals so each scanner thinks its got its own antenna. I am pretty new to this and would appreciate any advice. Thanks. Try Stridsberg Engineering. They have 4 and 8 port multi-couplers with built in amps to negate the splitting loss. They are quite expensive, however they are top quality and work extremely well. http://www.stridsberg.com/prod01.htm Larry |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jason Wagner ...
^ Going to have one to two antennas up on a mast feeding ^ several (or more) scanners down below. Looking for an ^ effective way to split + amplify the signals so each ^ scanner thinks its got its own antenna. Before you buy anything additional try all the receivers on the one or two split signals. T-adapters and short lengths of coax from the antennas to the receivers would be all you need. With the antennas up high and unless you're trying to receive weak signals, the split signal might still be strong enough for what you want to receive. If the signals are not strong enough in that configuration then keep this in mind when you're looking for something to buy: these are receive-only radios that do not need to be inductively matched to a transmitter and they do not need expensive antennas designed for high power output. A duplexer is not required. Frank |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Before you buy anything additional try all the receivers on the one or two
split signals. T-adapters and short lengths of coax from the antennas to the receivers would be all you need. With the antennas up high and unless you're trying to receive weak signals, the split signal might still be strong enough for what you want to receive. Thanks Frank. I actually have a cheapie $5 splitter from Radio Shack. I've got a Pro-2026 and a Pro-2004, both tied to a Radio Shack antenna. Off the splitter, the 2026 receives fine but the 2004 doesn't get anything at all. With the antenna straight into the 2006 it picks up juts fine. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Before you buy anything additional try all the receivers on the one or two split signals. T-adapters and short lengths of coax from the antennas to the receivers would be all you need. With the antennas up high and unless you're trying to receive weak signals, the split signal might still be strong enough for what you want to receive. If a simple Tee is used ( I assume we are not talking about a 2 way splitter as used in MATV/CATV)- local oscillator and perhaps synthesizer noise from one scanner will be impressed directly on the other scanner. Depending on the freqs monitored- this can be devastating. In addition, loss to each scanner may be dramatic at those freqs where the jumpers are odd multiples of electrical 1/4 wavelength. If the signals are not strong enough in that configuration then keep this in mind when you're looking for something to buy: these are receive-only radios that do not need to be inductively matched to a transmitter and they do not need expensive antennas designed for high power output. A duplexer is not required. Frank I don't think you mean inductively matched- perhaps impedance matched? Dale W4OP |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dale Parfitt ...
^ I don't think you mean inductively matched- perhaps ^ impedance matched? Yea, that other "I" word. Thanks. Frank |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You need to consider that scanners can interact with each other with using a
T connector. A scanner will actually generate it's own RF frequencies. When I had a T connector installed, I would here pulsing noises on my ICOM R8500 whenever my PRO-2006 would lock onto a frequency. The pulsing corresponded to the blinking bank indicator on the PRO-2006. Installing a Stridsberg MCA204 solved that problem and also improved reception. -- David M. Hitchner - K5DMH Baton Rouge, LA Baton Rouge Area Scanning http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-k5dmh ASDS - Anti-Spam Defense System - Do not Auto-Reply For replies, use my callsign @bellsouth.net or @arrl.net. Artificial Intelligence is no match for Natural Stupidity! "Jason Wagner" wrote in message ... Going to have one to two antennas up on a mast feeding several (or more) scanners down below. Looking for an effective way to split + amplify the signals so each scanner thinks its got its own antenna. I am pretty new to this and would appreciate any advice. Thanks. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David M. Hitchner ...
^ You need to consider that scanners can interact with ^ each other with using a T connector. A scanner will ^ actually generate it's own RF frequencies. I don't doubt that is true but I haven't experienced it. I generally keep at least two receivers connected to a single antenna and I've had up to four on the same antenna. Of the two, one is Sony and the other is RS. The other two receivers are both RS and they are sometimes on the same antenna too. I have experienced it though on an RS receiver from a Yaesu radio that's on a completely separate system, but in close proximity. Frank |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Antenna | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Equipment | |||
Best Scanner Antenna | Scanner | |||
Outdoor Antenna and lack of intermod | Scanner | |||
Great mobile scanner antenna - and cheap ! | Scanner |