Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would like to try an decode CTCSS tones with my scanner. Most software
that is out there to do this, you must have a discriminator tap so it will grab the audio better. I am using WinTone without a discriminator tap, just straight audio into the line input soundcard. This seems to work somewhat well, but I was wondering if there is any other program's out there that would be able to do the same job but without having to use a discriminator tap. Also, the same goes for decoding trunking systems etc....especially Motorola systems. Is there any program's out there that will do this with the straight audio going into the sound card? Thank you |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 21:33:38 -0500, "RadioMan2"
m said in alt.radio.scanner: I am using WinTone without a discriminator tap, just straight audio into the line input soundcard. This seems to work somewhat well, but I was wondering if there is any other program's out there that would be able to do the same job but without having to use a discriminator tap. It's not the program. Most radios have a high-pass filter in the audio so that you don't hear the CTCSS tone. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Al Klein wrote:
It's not the program. Most radios have a high-pass filter in the audio so that you don't hear the CTCSS tone. No, most radios have a three-inch speaker that can't reproduce the CTCSS tone. If you plug a hi-fi speaker into most radios, you'll hear the CTCSS just fine. -- The state religion of the USA is atheism, as established by the courts. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() clifto wrote: Al Klein wrote: It's not the program. Most radios have a high-pass filter in the audio so that you don't hear the CTCSS tone. No, most radios have a three-inch speaker that can't reproduce the CTCSS tone. If you plug a hi-fi speaker into most radios, you'll hear the CTCSS just fine. No, don't think so. The CTCSS tones are 'sub-audible', that is, they are below the range that humans can hear. dxAce Michigan USA -- The state religion of the USA is atheism, as established by the courts. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() dx'tard wrote: No, don't think so. The CTCSS tones are 'sub-audible', that is, they are below the range that humans can hear. You are wrong. Not to say you are a lying. This is a list of commonly used PL/CTCSS tones (all in Hz): 67.0 69.3 71.9 74.4 77.0 79.7 82.5 85.4 88.5 91.5 94.8 97.4 100.0 103.5 107.2 110.9 114.8 118.8 123.0 127.3 131.8 136.5 141.3 146.2 151.4 156.7 162.2 167.9 173.8 179.9 186.2 192.8 203.5 206.5 210.7 218.1 225.7 229.1 233.6 241.8 250.3 254.1 You will see that they are very audible on a decent system. The only reason they are not audible on systems using this tones -and some others too- is, that they are using a high pass filter cutting all freqs below 300Hz or so. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Volker Tonn wrote: dx'tard wrote: No, don't think so. The CTCSS tones are 'sub-audible', that is, they are below the range that humans can hear. You are wrong. Not to say you are a lying. This is a list of commonly used PL/CTCSS tones (all in Hz): 67.0 69.3 71.9 74.4 77.0 79.7 82.5 85.4 88.5 91.5 94.8 97.4 100.0 103.5 107.2 110.9 114.8 118.8 123.0 127.3 131.8 136.5 141.3 146.2 151.4 156.7 162.2 167.9 173.8 179.9 186.2 192.8 203.5 206.5 210.7 218.1 225.7 229.1 233.6 241.8 250.3 254.1 You will see that they are very audible on a decent system. The only reason they are not audible on systems using this tones -and some others too- is, that they are using a high pass filter cutting all freqs below 300Hz or so. That is correct. So... plugging the radio into a better speaker will therefore not help... unless the high pass filter is disabled. dxAce Michigan USA |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 21:33:38 -0500, "RadioMan2"
m wrote: I would like to try an decode CTCSS tones with my scanner. Most software that is out there to do this, you must have a discriminator tap so it will grab the audio better. Not that it helps you but in RTFMing the manual on my handheld 2m/70cm transciever it will decode the CTCSS tone. This has to be done on the receive frequency though so I'd have to be in range of the transmitting radio rather than the repeater. Tony |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 04 Dec 2004 23:19:15 GMT, Tony VE6MVP
said in alt.radio.scanner: On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 21:33:38 -0500, "RadioMan2" wrote: I would like to try an decode CTCSS tones with my scanner. Most software that is out there to do this, you must have a discriminator tap so it will grab the audio better. Not that it helps you but in RTFMing the manual on my handheld 2m/70cm transciever it will decode the CTCSS tone. This has to be done on the receive frequency though so I'd have to be in range of the transmitting radio rather than the repeater. Many repeaters transmit the CTCSS tone. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Major CTCSS Bug in the new BC898T | Scanner | |||
CTCSS question | Scanner | |||
WANTED: Uniden Scanner BC002 CTCSS Tone Board | Equipment | |||
Enbridge/Consumers CTCSS TONE | Scanner | |||
ctcss tone board | Scanner |