CW isn't preventing the modernization of ham radio. Laziness is.
 

LOL!

I laugh when you lazy asses whine CW is keeping you from modernizing.

The code requirement isn't stopping anyone from modernizing. Hams don't
want to modernize and won't modernize unless they're forced to modernize.
That's what's stopping the modernization.

How does having a CW requirement prevent you from hooking a computer to a
rig? It don't. You don't want to modernize because you're stupid or lazy.
Just like you don't want to learn CW because you're stupid or lazy.

SC

CW is. Laziness iand therby blaocking modernization in the ARS
 

Slow Code wrote:
LOL!

I laugh when you lazy asses whine CW is keeping you from modernizing.

The code requirement isn't stopping anyone from modernizing. Hams don't
want to modernize and won't modernize unless they're forced to modernize.
That's what's stopping the modernization.

and cw usage as well as test promtoes that sort of laziness

CW isn't preventing the modernization of ham radio. Laziness is.
 

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 23:09:17 GMT, Slow Code wrote:


Just like you don't want to learn CW because you're stupid or lazy.

------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

Naw, CW makes it too easy to communicate. CW is for lazy people. Real
hams want to struggle to copy signals through noise and QRM. That's
why they hate CW... it's no challenge!

Bill, W6WRT

CW is. Laziness iand therby blaocking modernization in the ARS
 

On 12 Jul 2006 16:12:12 -0700, "an old freind"
wrote:

I laugh when you lazy asses whine CW is keeping you from modernizing.

The code requirement isn't stopping anyone from modernizing. Hams don't
want to modernize and won't modernize unless they're forced to modernize.
That's what's stopping the modernization.

and cw usage as well as test promtoes that sort of laziness

Nonsense. Having to do something promotes laziness? Then exercise
promotes sloth and dieting promotes obesity. By your "logic", that
is.

CW isn't preventing the modernization of ham radio. Laziness is.
 

Bill Turner wrote in
:

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 23:09:17 GMT, Slow Code wrote:


Just like you don't want to learn CW because you're stupid or lazy.

------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

Naw, CW makes it too easy to communicate. CW is for lazy people. Real
hams want to struggle to copy signals through noise and QRM. That's
why they hate CW... it's no challenge!

Bill, W6WRT


Or when a couple ops with amplifiers move in a little too close to your
on-going qso. That does make things tough, and then they laugh at you
when you politely ask them to move up the band a little. LOL

CW isn't preventing the modernization of ham radio. Laziness is.
 

Slow Code wrote:
LOL!

I laugh when you lazy asses whine CW is keeping you from modernizing.

The code requirement isn't stopping anyone from modernizing. Hams don't
want to modernize and won't modernize unless they're forced to modernize.
That's what's stopping the modernization.

How does having a CW requirement prevent you from hooking a computer to a
rig? It don't. You don't want to modernize because you're stupid or lazy.
Just like you don't want to learn CW because you're stupid or lazy.

SC

LOL! It started a long, long time ago.

When gasoline was 17 Cents a gallon, hams were complainining about how
hard it was to get to the FCC office and wanted a mail-order license.
The conditional was born.

It's been downhill ever since.

CW is. Laziness iand therby blaocking modernization in the ARS
 

On 13 Jul 2006 07:12:36 -0700, "an old freind"
wrote:

Al Klein wrote:
On 12 Jul 2006 16:12:12 -0700, "an old freind"
wrote:

and cw usage as well as test promtoes that sort of laziness

Nonsense.

indeed the idea that refusing to expand ones horizon is nonsense

The idea that testing someone promotes laziness is nonsense.

Having to do something promotes laziness?

nope not chnaging and resting on lareuls does

So resting on your laurels and not learning CW promotes your laziness.
That's what I said and you agree.

CW is. Laziness iand therby blaocking modernization in the ARS
 

On 13 Jul 2006 18:55:07 -0700, "an old friend"
wrote:

Al Klein wrote:

The idea that testing someone promotes laziness is nonsense.

not the test that was the subject
use of the mode promotes lazness

Learning something promotes laziness? Typical.

learning CW promotes laziness

Yep, as I said, typical. Of a lazy person. Learning doesn't promote
laziness, laziness promotes not learning.

CW is. Laziness iand therby blaocking modernization in the ARS
 

Al Klein wrote:
... laziness promotes not learning.

Some German General went on the record as preferring
his officers to be *intelligent and lazy*. He said the most
dangerous officers are the ambitious and stupid ones.
Now if I could just remember his name.
--
73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

CW is. Laziness iand therby blaocking modernization in the ARS
 

Cecil Moore wrote:
Al Klein wrote:
... laziness promotes not learning.

Some German General went on the record as preferring
his officers to be *intelligent and lazy*. He said the most
dangerous officers are the ambitious and stupid ones.
Now if I could just remember his name.
Cecicl I think I rememebr that quote

but I think it is an ADmiral von Tirpitz the father of the WW1 navy
--
73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

CW is. Laziness iand therby blaocking modernization in the ARS
 

On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 14:38:57 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Al Klein wrote:
... laziness promotes not learning.

Some German General went on the record as preferring
his officers to be *intelligent and lazy*. He said the most
dangerous officers are the ambitious and stupid ones.
Now if I could just remember his name.

Ribbentrop? It sounds like him.

CW is. Laziness iand therby blaocking modernization in the ARS
 

an old freind wrote:
but I think it is an ADmiral von Tirpitz the father of the WW1 navy

Thanks, I'll research it.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

CW is. Laziness iand therby blaocking modernization in the ARS
 

Cecil Moore wrote:
an old freind wrote:
but I think it is an ADmiral von Tirpitz the father of the WW1 navy

Thanks, I'll research it.
your welcome I am sure I knw the quote now that you mention is myself
I hope you will let us know what you find
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

CW isn't preventing the modernization of ham radio. Laziness is.
 

CW isn't preventing the modernization of ham radio. Laziness is.
 

Slow Code wrote:
wrote in
oups.com:



It's been downhill ever since.


I agree with that.

Whether you like or use CW or not, dumbing down as hurt ham radio.
in english please



SC
people that live in glass house whoudl dress in basement

CW isn't preventing the modernization of ham radio. Laziness is.
 

On 14 Jul 2006 17:07:18 -0700, "an old freind"
wrote:

Slow Code wrote:

Whether you like or use CW or not, dumbing down as hurt ham radio.

in english please

Dumbing down has hurt ham radio.

people that live in glass house whoudl dress in basement

Yep, you should. Try:

"People who live in glass houses should dress in the basement"

It's ironic justice that someone who posts a typo flame posts more
typos in his flame than the post he's flaming.

CW is. Laziness iand therby blaocking modernization in the ARS
 

On 14 Jul 2006 21:40:50 -0700, "an old friend"
wrote:

Barry OGrady wrote:

Nearly as lazy as people who don't punctuate or use a spell chequer.

well the forum encourages it

The forum doesn't, your laziness does. Your laziness is also what
encourages you to blame your own faults on others. That, and your
dishonesty.

CW is. Laziness iand therby blaocking modernization in the ARS
 

Al Klein wrote:
On 14 Jul 2006 21:40:50 -0700, "an old friend"
wrote:

Barry OGrady wrote:

Nearly as lazy as people who don't punctuate or use a spell chequer.

well the forum encourages it

The forum doesn't, your laziness does.
sure it does
Your laziness is also what
encourages you to blame your own faults on others.
nope
That, and your
dishonesty.
gee I am not the one that lies about the contents of posting here and
clips away the evdence of my lies

that is

you want to fosillize and kil the ARS that is a fact

Id like to save it
that makes me a better ham than you hands down

esp when you don't give your call cowardly troll

CW isn't preventing the modernization of ham radio. Laziness is.
 

Barry OGrady wrote in
:

On 14 Jul 2006 17:07:18 -0700, "an old freind"
wrote:


Slow Code wrote:
wrote in
oups.com:



It's been downhill ever since.


I agree with that.

Whether you like or use CW or not, dumbing down as hurt ham radio.
in english please



SC
people that live in glass house whoudl dress in basement

In english please, with punctuation and spacing between quoted and your
text and proper quoting and spelling.

Barry


ROFL, Sorry. I'm starting to believe laughing at him just encourages him
to make more typo's. We need to stop laughing and pity him instead.

Maybe if he had to learn CW the mental process would help his spelling.

SC

CW is Laziness
 

Slow Code wrote:
Barry OGrady wrote in
:




ROFL, Sorry. I'm starting to believe laughing at him just encourages him
to make more typo's. We need to stop laughing and pity him instead.
insisting on foucing on the stupid stuff shows you lack a real argument

Maybe if he had to learn CW the mental process would help his spelling.
nope tried that just gave me headaches

SC

CW is Laziness
 

I guess until you stop trying to teach a pig to sing, you will reside in my
killfile

"an old friend" wrote in message
ups.com...

Slow Code wrote:
Barry OGrady wrote in
:




ROFL, Sorry. I'm starting to believe laughing at him just encourages him
to make more typo's. We need to stop laughing and pity him instead.
insisting on foucing on the stupid stuff shows you lack a real argument

Maybe if he had to learn CW the mental process would help his spelling.
nope tried that just gave me headaches

SC

CW is Laziness
 

Noon-Air wrote:
I guess until you stop trying to teach a pig to sing, you will reside in my
killfile
thank you very much

if yonly you mean it

Auction the ham bands to the Highest Bidder
 

amateur radio is obsolete and nobody cares about it.

The ham frequencies should be auctioned to the highest bidder!

Auction the ham bands to the Highest Bidder
 

amateur radio is obsolete and nobody cares about it.

The ham frequencies should be auctioned to the highest bidder!

CW is Laziness
 

On 17 Jul 2006 17:12:42 -0700, "an old friend"
wrote:

Slow Code wrote:

Maybe if he had to learn CW the mental process would help his spelling.

nope tried that just gave me headaches

Not capable of producing a single coherent sentence. Not capable of
learning 26 letter and 10 digits. And thinking gives you a headache.

Only conclusion is that you don't have enough practice, so stop
thinking entirely before you cause permanent damage.

CW is Laziness
 

Al Klein wrote:
On 17 Jul 2006 17:12:42 -0700, "an old friend"
wrote:

Slow Code wrote:

Maybe if he had to learn CW the mental process would help his spelling.

nope tried that just gave me headaches

Not capable of producing a single coherent sentence.
lying again
Not capable of
learning 26 letter and 10 digits.
in mores no I am not
And thinking gives you a headache.
and lying again

Only conclusion is that you don't have enough practice, so stop
thinking entirely before you cause permanent damage.
we have alreadly seen you support dishonesty over all

why trust you postings to be factual

Auction the ham bands to the Highest Bidder
 

On 17 Jul 2006 19:03:59 -0700, wrote:

amateur radio is obsolete and nobody cares about it.

The ham frequencies should be auctioned to the highest bidder!

So should you. But I doubt there'd be any bidders.

Auction the ham bands to the Highest Bidder
 

Al Klein wrote:

On 17 Jul 2006 19:03:59 -0700, wrote:

amateur radio is obsolete and nobody cares about it.

The ham frequencies should be auctioned to the highest bidder!

So should you. But I doubt there'd be any bidders.


Rendering plants are always looking for fat to make soap.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

Auction the ham bands to the Highest Bidder
 

nice troll.... welcome to my killfile

*PLONK*

wrote in message
oups.com...
amateur radio is obsolete and nobody cares about it.

The ham frequencies should be auctioned to the highest bidder!

Auction the ham bands to the Highest Bidder
 

wrote in message
oups.com...
amateur radio is obsolete and nobody cares about it.

The ham frequencies should be auctioned to the highest bidder!


......but what if nobody bids ?

Auction the ham bands to the Highest Bidder
 

On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:03:27 +0900, "Brenda Ann"
wrote:

The bands 220 and below are not viable at all commercially because of the size of antenna needed.

Don't forget, UPS (or was it FedEx) wanted part of 220.

Auction the ham bands to the Highest Bidder
 

get help sicko
 

Slow Code wrote:

Sorry, CB'ers already got dibs on the bands after CW goes away.

SC
you are sicko get help and you will feel better you are surely suffring
from the long terms effects of narrow band rf expousure

Auction the ham bands to the Highest Bidder
 

amateur radio is obsolete and nobody cares about it.

The ham frequencies should be auctioned to the highest bidder!


Don't you get tired of being an ass hole?

CW isn't preventing the modernization of ham radio. Laziness is.
 

Slow Code wrote:
Barry OGrady wrote in
:

On 14 Jul 2006 17:07:18 -0700, "an old freind"
wrote:


Slow Code wrote:
wrote in
oups.com:



It's been downhill ever since.


I agree with that.

Whether you like or use CW or not, dumbing down as hurt ham radio.
in english please



SC
people that live in glass house whoudl dress in basement

In english please, with punctuation and spacing between quoted and your
text and proper quoting and spelling.

Barry

Get over yourself.

ROFL, Sorry. I'm starting to believe laughing at him just encourages him
to make more typo's. We need to stop laughing and pity him instead.

Maybe if he had to learn CW the mental process would help his spelling.

SC

I wonder how many a retired old-timer who decided to join ham radio
stroked out instead while doing speed runs trying to get to 13/20wpm on
CW?

CW isn't preventing the modernization of ham radio. Laziness is.
 

CW isn't preventing the modernization of ham radio. Laziness is.
 

Slow Code wrote:
wrote in
oups.com:


Slow Code wrote:
Barry OGrady wrote in
:

On 14 Jul 2006 17:07:18 -0700, "an old freind"
wrote:


Slow Code wrote:
wrote in
oups.com:



It's been downhill ever since.


I agree with that.

Whether you like or use CW or not, dumbing down as hurt ham radio.
in english please



SC
people that live in glass house whoudl dress in basement

In english please, with punctuation and spacing between quoted and
your text and proper quoting and spelling.

Barry

Get over yourself.

ROFL, Sorry. I'm starting to believe laughing at him just encourages
him to make more typo's. We need to stop laughing and pity him
instead.

Maybe if he had to learn CW the mental process would help his spelling.

SC

I wonder how many a retired old-timer who decided to join ham radio
stroked out instead while doing speed runs trying to get to 13/20wpm on
CW?


Why don't you get on your CB and ask them.

SC

I don't think a CB will go that far.

CW is Laziness
 

Slow Code wrote:
wrote in
oups.com:


I wonder how many a retired old-timer who decided to join ham radio
stroked out instead while doing speed runs trying to get to 13/20wpm on
CW?


Why don't you get on your CB and ask them.
the idea the radio could contact the dead was bad enough in frequency
do you need to repeat it

but one of your other nicks is hey stupid so I guess we must expect
that

SC