Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anyone got any suggestions as to whether there have been any developments in
short-wave radio technology in the last few years which mandate looking for some specific radio please? I accidentally broke the display on my YB400, which never actually picked up many stations at all in any event. Only VERY local god-spots. I always suspected some problem with its factory set-up. The scan function would just spin past perfectly strong stations for no apparent reason. And I use it in the dark and when I DID find some station, setting the memory is (to me) a nightmare. In the dark, switching between bands is virtually impossible. Worst of all, using it with headphones is an even worse nightma It pushes out a painful pressure wave into your ear every time it stops!! Has any other company ever developed any proper seek function on short wave or does anyone think that the YB500 actually picks up stations any better than this one does? It doesn't bother with any sort of seek function, preferring to stop every second or so in the hope of picking up at least something! |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think the search function on the newer Chinese radios work OK - but
not perfect - and I use them at night in the dark when my XYL is sleeping. I have a Kaito/Degen 1102 which is pretty sensitive and searches OK, and also my Realistic/Sangean DX-398/ATS-909 searches OK. Gotta turn off that beep on the Sangean... but they both work -- Again, not perfect, but acceptable enough to enable searching in total darkness with the dial light off. Just my take. Works for me, anyway... // Richards // =================================== news.rcn.com wrote: Has any other company ever developed any proper seek function |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richards" wrote in message oups.com... I think the search function on the newer Chinese radios work OK - but not perfect - and I use them at night in the dark when my XYL is sleeping. I have a Kaito/Degen 1102 which is pretty sensitive and searches OK, and also my Realistic/Sangean DX-398/ATS-909 searches OK. Gotta turn off that beep on the Sangean... but they both work -- Again, not perfect, but acceptable enough to enable searching in total darkness with the dial light off. Does the seek search between 'bands' or is there some way of switching between bands manually? Also, when you search manually, do you find stations missed by the seek button? And can it be used with an ear-phone like the YB400 can't? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
And does anyone know if the KA11 (or DE11) is a new and updated version of
the 1102 with all the same circuitry in a smaller package or is it some cheapy no-feature low grade low sensitivity completely different model? "news.rcn.com" news.rnc.com wrote in message ... "Richards" wrote in message oups.com... I think the search function on the newer Chinese radios work OK - but not perfect - and I use them at night in the dark when my XYL is sleeping. I have a Kaito/Degen 1102 which is pretty sensitive and searches OK, and also my Realistic/Sangean DX-398/ATS-909 searches OK. Gotta turn off that beep on the Sangean... but they both work -- Again, not perfect, but acceptable enough to enable searching in total darkness with the dial light off. Does the seek search between 'bands' or is there some way of switching between bands manually? Also, when you search manually, do you find stations missed by the seek button? And can it be used with an ear-phone like the YB400 can't? |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I broke 3 YB-400s! My Kaito KA-1102 has fallen 5-6 times with no harm.
George (MN) news.rcn.com wrote: Anyone got any suggestions as to whether there have been any developments in short-wave radio technology in the last few years which mandate looking for some specific radio please? I accidentally broke the display on my YB400, which never actually picked up many stations at all in any event. Only VERY local god-spots. I always suspected some problem with its factory set-up. The scan function would just spin past perfectly strong stations for no apparent reason. And I use it in the dark and when I DID find some station, setting the memory is (to me) a nightmare. In the dark, switching between bands is virtually impossible. Worst of all, using it with headphones is an even worse nightma It pushes out a painful pressure wave into your ear every time it stops!! Has any other company ever developed any proper seek function on short wave or does anyone think that the YB500 actually picks up stations any better than this one does? It doesn't bother with any sort of seek function, preferring to stop every second or so in the hope of picking up at least something! |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, I am prepared to accept that, and the input transistors of my Grundig
seem to have been blown since I took delivery of it: But this Degen company, - which has a reputation for continuously improving their models, - has just brought out this completely new and attractive-looking KA11 or DE11 model with a VERY interesting feature which lets it seek and automatically store virtually all locally available stations simply by pressing a button. So you can automatically adjust for whatever is going on in the tropopause every time you turn on the unit! No one seems to know yet if it incorporates the circuitry of the already extant models or if they have ventured into the cheapie no-frills piece of junk end of the market and stuck a few bells and whistles on it (like Phillips). I would just go out and buy one as it is relatively inexpensive but there are some snobbish reports of it not being dual conversion (meaning it clearly isn't just the old trusted circuitry updated), and some reports of that meaning nothing IN PRACTICE so I am wary. wrote in message oups.com... I broke 3 YB-400s! My Kaito KA-1102 has fallen 5-6 times with no harm. George (MN) |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
ka-11, don't bother...i ordered one and sent it right
back....terrible selectivity, virtually no sensitivity, cheap construction, speaker is awful..sure looks nice though. news.rcn.com wrote: And does anyone know if the KA11 (or DE11) is a new and updated version of the 1102 with all the same circuitry in a smaller package or is it some cheapy no-feature low grade low sensitivity completely different model? "news.rcn.com" news.rnc.com wrote in message ... "Richards" wrote in message oups.com... I think the search function on the newer Chinese radios work OK - but not perfect - and I use them at night in the dark when my XYL is sleeping. I have a Kaito/Degen 1102 which is pretty sensitive and searches OK, and also my Realistic/Sangean DX-398/ATS-909 searches OK. Gotta turn off that beep on the Sangean... but they both work -- Again, not perfect, but acceptable enough to enable searching in total darkness with the dial light off. Does the seek search between 'bands' or is there some way of switching between bands manually? Also, when you search manually, do you find stations missed by the seek button? And can it be used with an ear-phone like the YB400 can't? |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greetings: I am not sure exactly what you expect from a radio that
is just a bit bigger then a deck of cards. No one should expect the performance of a average size portable or tabletop rig. I own several radios, my Panasonic RF-2200, and a Sony ICF-2002, Eton E5, and others. Can my Degen DE11 compete with them?? Not a chance. They outperform the DE11/KA11 by miles. But read on. The DE11/KA11 is not intended to equal their performance. I don't expect it to do so. I purchased a Degen DE11 on eBay, and I am very pleased with its performance and build. Is it perfect? Not a chance. But I have yet to hear of a perfect radio. Does it leave anything to be desired? Of course. I would love for it to have syncronous detection, mutiple bandwidths, double conversion etc. But HEY! Look at the size of this thing, and tell me you really expect that in something this tiny. I think it's quite a deal that it is totally digital, with a number of scanning features, and lots of memories, nicely lit digital display etc. No, it is not a re-done KA1102. Who-ever told you that really has the wrong information. It is a very much up-graded DE105/KA105. The back of the radio is identical, and it is just a couple millimeters thicker. The telescopic antenna of course is not very long when extended of course. Again, that is to be expected given the radio's size. It benefits from clipping an extra ten to twenty feet of wire to the antenna, or plugging in the wire extension antenna that comes with it. Much more and you would probably get overload on a radio this tiny. But I find it receives quit well on all bands, again, taking into consideration it's size. Better then I expected for a radio so small. I think it has, for its size, great sensitivity and selectivity. And in my opinion, the build is more then adequate. As far as construction, it is at least equal to the KA1102, or Eton E5. I bought a little digital camera case that gives it great protection, fits it like a glove, and has a small pouch that holds the extended wire antenna, and a couple of spare rechargable batteries. I would not hesitate to take it camping and hiking. It takes up just a small little spot inside my back-pack. At home, I will listen to my Panasonic, Sony or Eton. I love those radios. But for a quick get-away to the backwoods on a camping, hiking or canoeing trip,or an emergency evacuation where space and weight are considerations, I would take the little Degen DE11/Kaito KA11 before any of them. I ordered a second one yesterday. Best regards |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greetings: I am not sure exactly what you expect from a radio that
is just a bit bigger then a deck of cards. No one should expect the performance of a average size portable or tabletop rig. I own several radios, my Panasonic RF-2200, and a Sony ICF-2002, Eton E5, and others. Can my Degen DE11 compete with them?? Not a chance. They outperform the DE11/KA11 by miles. But read on. The DE11/KA11 is not intended to equal their performance. I don't expect it to do so. I purchased a Degen DE11 on eBay, and I am very pleased with its performance and build. Is it perfect? Not a chance. But I have yet to hear of a perfect radio. Does it leave anything to be desired? Of course. I would love for it to have syncronous detection, mutiple bandwidths, double conversion etc. But HEY! Look at the size of this thing, and tell me you really expect that in something this tiny. I think it's quite a deal that it is totally digital, with a number of scanning features, and lots of memories, nicely lit digital display etc. No, it is not a re-done KA1102. Who-ever told you that really has the wrong information. It is a very much up-graded DE105/KA105. The back of the radio is identical, and it is just a couple millimeters thicker. The telescopic antenna of course is not very long when extended of course. Again, that is to be expected given the radio's size. It benefits from clipping an extra ten to twenty feet of wire to the antenna, or plugging in the wire extension antenna that comes with it. Much more and you would probably get overload on a radio this tiny. But I find it receives quit well on all bands, again, taking into consideration it's size. Better then I expected for a radio so small. And did I mention the price? Very reasonable. You should be able to find it for between forty to fifty bucks. I think it has, for its size and price, great sensitivity and selectivity. And in my opinion, the build is more then adequate. As far as construction, it is at least equal to the KA1102, or Eton E5. I bought a little digital camera case that gives it great protection, fits it like a glove, and has a small pouch that holds the extended wire antenna, and a couple of spare rechargable batteries. I would not hesitate to take it camping and hiking. It takes up just a small little spot inside my back-pack. At home, I will listen to my Panasonic, Sony or Eton, (sometimes my DE11 just because I like it too.) I love those radios. But for a quick get-away to the backwoods on a camping, hiking or canoeing trip,or an emergency evacuation where space and weight are considerations, I would take the little Degen DE11/Kaito KA11 before any of my larger heavier radios. I ordered a second DE11 a couple of days ago.. Best regards, Cato news.rcn.com wrote: And does anyone know if the KA11 (or DE11) is a new and updated version of the 1102 with all the same circuitry in a smaller package or is it some cheapy no-feature low grade low sensitivity completely different model? "news.rcn.com" news.rnc.com wrote in message ... |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cato" wrote Greetings: I am not sure exactly what you expect from a radio that is just a bit bigger then a deck of cards. No one should expect the performance of a average size portable or tabletop rig. I own several radios, my Panasonic RF-2200, and a Sony ICF-2002, Eton E5, and others. Can my Degen DE11 compete with them?? Not a chance. They outperform the DE11/KA11 by miles. But read on. The DE11/KA11 is not intended to equal their performance. I don't expect it to do so. I purchased a Degen DE11 on eBay, and I am very pleased with its performance and build. Is it perfect? Not a chance. But I have yet to hear of a perfect radio. Does it leave anything to be desired? Of course. I would love for it to have syncronous detection, mutiple bandwidths, double conversion etc. But HEY! Look at the size of this thing, and tell me you really expect that in something this tiny. Yes, I do! With my Sony SW100 and SW07. You get what you pay for. A DE11? BWAHAHAHA!!!! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Grundig YB400 Wanted | Shortwave | |||
Comparison needed: PL200/230 vs YB400 | Shortwave | |||
For sale, YB400 and Palstar-AA30. | Shortwave | |||
Need to replace a 40 year old television antenna wall jack - help! | General | |||
YB400 PE Hum | Shortwave |