Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 4th 03, 08:23 AM
Pete KE9OA
 
Posts: n/a
Default MW Receiver

The MW receiver is progressing pretty well.................I have completed
the synthesizer, and am now doing the final pass on the receiver board
itself. MDS measures at .2uV right now, with strong signal handling up to
about 900mV.
Next week, I plan to design the sync detector, but there are a couple of
things to keep in mind. If there are two closely spaced signals, the
stronger signal will capture the system. For this reason, I may also include
the envelope detector function.
The initial results are very encouraging....................in the "RF
Alley" that I live in, with three 50kW MW broadcasters, no overload problems
were noted. I will keep all of you posted on the progress of the design.

Pete


  #2   Report Post  
Old December 4th 03, 08:59 AM
Brenda Ann
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Pete KE9OA" wrote in message
...
The MW receiver is progressing pretty well.................I have

completed
the synthesizer, and am now doing the final pass on the receiver board
itself. MDS measures at .2uV right now, with strong signal handling up to
about 900mV.
Next week, I plan to design the sync detector, but there are a couple of
things to keep in mind. If there are two closely spaced signals, the
stronger signal will capture the system. For this reason, I may also

include
the envelope detector function.
The initial results are very encouraging....................in the "RF
Alley" that I live in, with three 50kW MW broadcasters, no overload

problems
were noted. I will keep all of you posted on the progress of the design.


Any ballpark idea of what this little jewel will end up costing??



  #3   Report Post  
Old December 4th 03, 09:13 AM
Pete KE9OA
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi Brenda,
I am not sure yet..............it depends upon what features
folks are looking for. If we put in the spectrum analyzer type of display,
and the sync detector, it will probably be in the just under 300 dollar
range. For this price, the performance will be in the class of the
multi-thousand dollar offerings from Harris, Racal, Rockwell-Collins, etc.
The unit will have a tracking preselector for the active loopstick antenna,
which will tilt in both planes. I am not sure if I will go for multiple
bandwidths, or use a couple of narrow bandwidth filters, and use a phasing
technique to achieve continous bandwidth control.
Still a few more ideas to implement.

Pete

Brenda Ann wrote in message
...

"Pete KE9OA" wrote in message
...
The MW receiver is progressing pretty well.................I have

completed
the synthesizer, and am now doing the final pass on the receiver board
itself. MDS measures at .2uV right now, with strong signal handling up

to
about 900mV.
Next week, I plan to design the sync detector, but there are a couple of
things to keep in mind. If there are two closely spaced signals, the
stronger signal will capture the system. For this reason, I may also

include
the envelope detector function.
The initial results are very encouraging....................in the "RF
Alley" that I live in, with three 50kW MW broadcasters, no overload

problems
were noted. I will keep all of you posted on the progress of the

design.


Any ballpark idea of what this little jewel will end up costing??





  #4   Report Post  
Old December 4th 03, 12:03 PM
Radioman390
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Joseph Worcester, who developed and sold the SPACE MAGNET ferrite active
antenna, also built a high-performance MW receiver and got a patent on the
circuit which changed the bandwidth as the signal strength changed. I remember
reading the patent and thinking he'd invented AM stereo. Jis radio sold for
$700 in the 70s.
Matt
  #5   Report Post  
Old December 4th 03, 01:15 PM
Gregg
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Behold, Pete KE9OA signalled from keyed 4-1000A filament:

........in the "RF Alley" that I live in, with
three 50kW MW broadcasters, no overload problems were noted. I will
keep all of you posted on the progress of the design.


All thanks to that diode-ring mixer ;-)

Thanks for keeping us posted Pete!

--
Gregg
*It's probably useful, even if it can't be SPICE'd*
http://geek.scorpiorising.ca


  #6   Report Post  
Old December 4th 03, 01:44 PM
Eric F. Richards
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks for keeping us in the loop on this, Pete, I'm *really* looking
forward to this one hitting the market.

Eric

--
Eric F. Richards,
"Nature abhors a vacuum tube." -- J. R. Pierce, Bell Labs, c. 1940
  #7   Report Post  
Old December 5th 03, 01:03 AM
RHF
 
Posts: n/a
Default

EFR, Ditto That !

Pete, nice to have your status report, and
to hear the progress that you are making.

kutgw ~ RHF
..
..
= = = Eric F. Richards
= = = wrote in message . ..
Thanks for keeping us in the loop on this, Pete, I'm *really* looking
forward to this one hitting the market.

Eric

  #8   Report Post  
Old December 5th 03, 04:05 AM
Marvin Kroll
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Is there any other information available about this receiver?
Is it meant to produced commercially?

"Pete KE9OA" wrote in message
...
The MW receiver is progressing pretty well.................I have

completed
the synthesizer, and am now doing the final pass on the receiver board
itself. MDS measures at .2uV right now, with strong signal handling up to
about 900mV.
Next week, I plan to design the sync detector, but there are a couple of
things to keep in mind. If there are two closely spaced signals, the
stronger signal will capture the system. For this reason, I may also

include
the envelope detector function.
The initial results are very encouraging....................in the "RF
Alley" that I live in, with three 50kW MW broadcasters, no overload

problems
were noted. I will keep all of you posted on the progress of the design.

Pete




  #9   Report Post  
Old December 5th 03, 05:30 AM
WShoots1
 
Posts: n/a
Default

...got a patent on the circuit which changed the bandwidth as the signal
strength changed.

Automatic regeneration control? I guess that would be shortened to ARC.

On a HW-101 I once had, I added manual regeneration control. Actually, I
modified the stage that had the RF gain control by adding a tickler feedback,
to do just that. To pick out a weaker signal, I would increase the RF gain,
effectively increasing the regeneration which would decrease the band width in
the process.

Bill, K5BY
  #10   Report Post  
Old December 5th 03, 05:37 AM
Photodano1
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Is it going to be in kit form? )
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history john private smith Policy 0 December 22nd 03 02:42 AM
Review: Ramsey HFRC-1 WWV receiver kit Tim Shoppa Equipment 4 September 8th 03 03:20 AM
Review: Ramsey HFRC-1 WWV receiver kit Tim Shoppa Homebrew 2 September 7th 03 02:45 PM
Review: Ramsey HFRC-1 WWV receiver kit Tim Shoppa Equipment 0 September 6th 03 08:52 PM
Review: Ramsey HFRC-1 WWV receiver kit Tim Shoppa Homebrew 0 September 6th 03 08:52 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017