RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   Radio Origins topic from March 13, Thanks to those who responded! (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/67391-radio-origins-topic-march-13-thanks-those-who-responded.html)

[email protected] March 22nd 05 12:01 AM

Radio Origins topic from March 13, Thanks to those who responded!
 
I would like to thank those who responded to my question regarding
radio origins in the US. To the people calling me lazy for not doing
my own research, you may be interested to know this paper was written
in two parts. One was discussing the topic of the question. The other
was analyzing the validity of human resources in groups like this one
(Google) and other resources such as Allexperts.com on the internet. I
don't blame the people calling me an imbecile and lazy, when all I
needed to do was a Google search. Please understand part of my
research was evaluating your responses. Thank you very much for your
help, and I apologize for misleading you in any way. The information
from those who answered was certainly used and greatly appreciated.
Thanks again.

Sincerely, Benji Mallicoat


Caveat Lector March 22nd 05 02:11 AM

Well I could have saved you a lot of analysis.

Here you will find opinions. Only a few take the time to quote a recognized
authority.
Or even know who the recognized authorities are.

An opinion is a belief stronger than impression and less strong than
positive knowledge.

Translated - people quote some fuzzy recollections, what a friend thinks,
what grandpa said, and frequently make things up.

Even books are frequently wrong or presumptive.

Your real answer should have been from recognized authorities and their
aren't any here.

Bottom line -- Caveat Lector




wrote in message
ups.com...
I would like to thank those who responded to my question regarding
radio origins in the US. To the people calling me lazy for not doing
my own research, you may be interested to know this paper was written
in two parts. One was discussing the topic of the question. The other
was analyzing the validity of human resources in groups like this one
(Google) and other resources such as Allexperts.com on the internet. I
don't blame the people calling me an imbecile and lazy, when all I
needed to do was a Google search. Please understand part of my
research was evaluating your responses. Thank you very much for your
help, and I apologize for misleading you in any way. The information
from those who answered was certainly used and greatly appreciated.
Thanks again.

Sincerely, Benji Mallicoat




[email protected] March 22nd 05 04:31 PM

Boy, it breaks my heart that a few of the folks in this group called
you lazy. You were essentially using the people in this group as guinea
pigs while conveniently failing to inform them of this fact--until of
course your rinky-dink "experiment" was over.

This kind of deceptive behavior really stinks, and it doesn't stink
less if you say "Thanks" or "I'm sorry" after the fact.

Steve


Dan March 22nd 05 10:20 PM

- This is what I thought..

http://slate.msn.com/id/2082741/

- Either that, or Jeff Gannon..



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com