Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I own a Rolex stainless steel Oyster Perpetual wris****ch.It has the
bezel ring that rotates and a window that shows the date.I paid about $230.00 for it and I paid $50.00 for my Mido wris****ch when I bought both wris****ches at the Navy Fleet Store in Hong Kong in 1964 when I went to Hong Kong for my R&R.I like my Mido wris****ch better than my Rolex wris****ch and it keeps better time than my Rolex wris****ch too,it always did.I think Rolex wris****ches are over rated.I quit wearing a wris****ch years ago. cuhulin |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"A twelve hour dial is easily read at a glance, a 24 hour, not so
easy." JS A 24 hour rotatable bezel with dark and light hours shaded as Seiko has used for years is exceptionally easy to glance at and tell whether the target zone is approaching evening, entering dawn, etc. It takes no conversion of 24 to 12 hour time...just knowing dark means dark, etc. " and beset with problems such as lack of shock resistance" JS Are you aware that for the past half century almost all mechanical watches use shock absorbtion devices like Kif or Diashock. Modern mechanical movements are surprisingly robust. If the last new watch you tried was in the 1940's, then I could understand why you might make such a statement. "How many G's will such a device withstand?" JS Well, since Omega sent it's chrono with a shock absorption escapement to the moon several decades ago, I would estimate that it would withstand several "G"s. And China's first astronaut wore a mechanical chinese-made chrono into space recently. Actually the valuf of Kif-like shock absorbers is mostly in absorbing sudden shock from being banged or dropped. I do have to ask...why are you asking about the number of G's a watch could withstand...is there some relevance to keeping track of time for swling or internatonal travel? |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
My Rolex never helped me get any more dates.It saw some rough times in
Vietnam in 1964.The crystal is cracked,the winding stem long since won't lock down anymore.After about two months,I threw it in my footlocker and I started wearing my Mido wris****ch,a much,much better wris****ch in my opinion and it only has the hour and minute hands and a sweep second hand on it.Just a plain,ordinary looking wris****ch it is and it still keeps just as good time as any mechanical wris****ch.I paid only $50.00 for it too as opposed to the $230.00 I paid for my Rolex.Back then,it was "thing to do" to be sporting a Rolex on your wrist. cuhulin |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2 Apr 2005 09:39:10 -0800, "John S." wrote:
I do have to ask...why are you asking about the number of G's a watch could withstand...is there some relevance to keeping track of time for swling or internatonal travel? Some people work with their hands for a living. |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am only staying on topic,that's all.Page 26 in my snail mail Popular
Science magazine.A spinning sphere is the secret to precise time.A $325,000 Jaeger-LeCoultre (there was a guy who went to the same public school I went to back in 1940's,his name is Claude Coultre) Gyrotourbillion wris****ch and some articles about www.yeswatch.com and fossil.com and suuntowatches.com www.dogpile.com Web Anywhere Wris****ch and www.gizmodo.com There is a fancy Pimp wris****ch available (I am not jokeing) and wris****ches that run on beer too. cuhulin |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, people do work with their hands for a living. Presumably a
blacksmith would not have need to tell time in 3 zones at one time and would remove any watch, electronic or mechanical. I know guys that golf with their automatic watch with no ill effect. Most of us who work with our hands but in less strenuous activities should not have to worry about their watch failing. And since the original thread asked about a 24 hour watch for swling, I'm still not clear how a G rating would come into play. David wrote: On 2 Apr 2005 09:39:10 -0800, "John S." wrote: I do have to ask...why are you asking about the number of G's a watch could withstand...is there some relevance to keeping track of time for swling or internatonal travel? Some people work with their hands for a living. |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
UTC is the same as GMT.(some folks call it Zulu) I live in the CTZ
(Central Time Zone) and I have always known London is six hours ahead of my time zone.Right now,it is (keep in mind,by the time I finish typing this and send and by the time it shows up at rec.radio.shortwave,the time will be a little later) 4:30 PM CTZ and it is 10:30 PM GMT. cuhulin |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
All you need to know is how many hours ahead of your time zone it is in
London.If where you live and y'all do change your clocks twice a year,(England does) then you will always know what time it is GMT.Otherwise,you will have to think that one hour difference.England does change their clocks twice a year like some parts of America.UTC is the same as GMT is the same as Zulu cuhulin |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
// Bug alert : Radio Netherlands screen saver works on 'local time' not UTC time for computing daytime illumination of the sun // | Shortwave | |||
Schedule of BBC World Service in local time | Shortwave | |||
North-Central Florida Mil Logs 9/3/2003 | Scanner |