Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In the past I have always used any old headphones for SWL. They almost
always had a wide frequency response somewhere around 20-20KHz. Recently I acquired a pair of closed ear Sony MDR-7502's ($50). They are smaller than the typical hi-fi phones, lighter and very comfortable. They are well made and not cheap like walkman type phones. Perfect for portables which is why I bought them. One thing I noticed that these phones have a narrower freq. response of about 60-16KHz. I had always known that hi-fi phones were not necessary and often fatiguing for SWL. Using these 7502's I now concur with that assessment. Knowing this I am now considering a pair of Kenwood HS-5's for the desktop receiver which is even more narrow in freq. response of around 150-4KHz. I was wondering if they are worth it for SWL? Does the 4KHz cut-off subtract appreciably from the program listening experience? Are they designed mainly for SSB/CW listening? It took my ears a few weeks to get used to the 7502's slightly less "high's" in the ear. But I find that now I have much less listeners fatigue without the "hiss" in the background. Should I expect a similar experience with the HS-5's? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello: I have an old pair of headphones made by Koss. They could be
about 30 years old. They were given to me by my Dad. Sometimes, I get a very painful lould knock sound. Not sure what causes that. Other then that, they work great. But funny looking. LOL! 73, SR! Li_Changchun wrote: In the past I have always used any old headphones for SWL. They almost always had a wide frequency response somewhere around 20-20KHz. Recently I acquired a pair of closed ear Sony MDR-7502's ($50). They are smaller than the typical hi-fi phones, lighter and very comfortable. They are well made and not cheap like walkman type phones. Perfect for portables which is why I bought them. One thing I noticed that these phones have a narrower freq. response of about 60-16KHz. I had always known that hi-fi phones were not necessary and often fatiguing for SWL. Using these 7502's I now concur with that assessment. Knowing this I am now considering a pair of Kenwood HS-5's for the desktop receiver which is even more narrow in freq. response of around 150-4KHz. I was wondering if they are worth it for SWL? Does the 4KHz cut-off subtract appreciably from the program listening experience? Are they designed mainly for SSB/CW listening? It took my ears a few weeks to get used to the 7502's slightly less "high's" in the ear. But I find that now I have much less listeners fatigue without the "hiss" in the background. Should I expect a similar experience with the HS-5's? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Li_Changchun wrote:
In the past I have always used any old headphones for SWL. They almost always had a wide frequency response somewhere around 20-20KHz. Recently I acquired a pair of closed ear Sony MDR-7502's ($50). They are smaller than the typical hi-fi phones, lighter and very comfortable. They are well made and not cheap like walkman type phones. Perfect for portables which is why I bought them. One thing I noticed that these phones have a narrower freq. response of about 60-16KHz. I had always known that hi-fi phones were not necessary and often fatiguing for SWL. Using these 7502's I now concur with that assessment. Knowing this I am now considering a pair of Kenwood HS-5's for the desktop receiver which is even more narrow in freq. response of around 150-4KHz. I was wondering if they are worth it for SWL? Does the 4KHz cut-off subtract appreciably from the program listening experience? Are they designed mainly for SSB/CW listening? It took my ears a few weeks to get used to the 7502's slightly less "high's" in the ear. But I find that now I have much less listeners fatigue without the "hiss" in the background. Should I expect a similar experience with the HS-5's? I use Radio Shack mono headphones, made for scanner use, on my Yaesu and am pleased with them. Hi fi headphones are designed for use on stereo equipment which means that they will have inadequate response for SW. Typical walkman headphones will be even worse. Go to your local Radio Shack and ask for the scanner headphones, check to see that the pair is mono, and they should work fine for SWL. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
running dogg wrote:
(snip) Hi fi headphones are designed for use on stereo equipment which means that they will have inadequate response for SW. Did you mean that as you wrote it, RD? If so, you have me confused. "Mono phones designed for SW listening will have inadequate response for Hi-Fi listening" would make more sense, that's the only reason I ask. Tony ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tony Meloche wrote:
running dogg wrote: (snip) Hi fi headphones are designed for use on stereo equipment which means that they will have inadequate response for SW. Did you mean that as you wrote it, RD? If so, you have me confused. "Mono phones designed for SW listening will have inadequate response for Hi-Fi listening" would make more sense, that's the only reason I ask. Ok, maybe not "response" in the way Li was talking about it. But I do know that if you try and use stereo headphones on a mono only radio, or mono phones on a stereo radio, that you will get all sorts of weird results, such as only one of the sides working. For example, I tried plugging in walkman phones to a RS mono FM radio, and only one side worked. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
running dogg wrote:
Tony Meloche wrote: running dogg wrote: (snip) Hi fi headphones are designed for use on stereo equipment which means that they will have inadequate response for SW. Did you mean that as you wrote it, RD? If so, you have me confused. "Mono phones designed for SW listening will have inadequate response for Hi-Fi listening" would make more sense, that's the only reason I ask. Ok, maybe not "response" in the way Li was talking about it. But I do know that if you try and use stereo headphones on a mono only radio, or mono phones on a stereo radio, that you will get all sorts of weird results, such as only one of the sides working. For example, I tried plugging in walkman phones to a RS mono FM radio, and only one side worked. No question of that - the lightweight "so-so" RS phones I use for SW listening work great. They are stereo, but there is a cheap adapter plug you can get at RS that turns them into "mono". Tony ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I own a pair of old World War Two headphones but I never use them.I
can't stand to wear headphones or use earbuds.They agravate the hell out of me. cuhulin |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Li_Changchun" wrote: Snip Stop changing your handle so you stay in the kill file you stinking Troll. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , SR
wrote: Hello: I have an old pair of headphones made by Koss. They could be about 30 years old. They were given to me by my Dad. Sometimes, I get a very painful lould knock sound. Not sure what causes that. Other then that, they work great. But funny looking. LOL! 73, SR! Snip That knock is God flicking a finger against the side of your head for answering a Troll on Usenet. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sony MDR-V150 headphones for $29, and a Koss EQ50 3 band equailzer for $10.
Makes the old Sangean ATS-803a sound as good as anyhing, including the Icom R75. And makes that sound great! RP on the coast in central CA, with a fine long wire, bad shortwave and good utitliy reception tonight in the fog..... ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Kenwood HS 5 Headphones | Equipment | |||
Sensifivity of 2000-ohm Headphones | Antenna | |||
Sensifivity of 2000-ohm Headphones | Antenna | |||
update on headphones for SWL | Shortwave | |||
headphones update | Shortwave |