Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's funny how he wants to overthrow a government that is going out of its
way to help spread democracy around the globe and he'll believe any and everything that would help to stop it. I like how the opposition to the war screams that we are killing our people which volunteered to go there in the first place and believe in this campaign. He'll you can barely call it a war with only 1800 losses in over three years. We lost more men between 1989-1996 ( 18,000+) in the military from normal operations and the Gulf war combined. We would have lost 1800 even if we would have stayed home. If only people looked at the numbers and the stats. B.H. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 16:56:34 -0500, "Brian Hill"
wrote: He'll you can barely call it a war with only 1800 losses in over three years. We lost more men between 1989-1996 ( 18,000+) in the military from normal operations and the Gulf war combined. How noble, how ****ing noble! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 16:56:34 -0500, "Brian Hill" wrote: He'll you can barely call it a war with only 1800 losses in over three years. We lost more men between 1989-1996 ( 18,000+) in the military from normal operations and the Gulf war combined. Uh, haven't you overlooked a little something? Aren't those ~14,000 kids with arms, legs and other various missing body parts also "losses"? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Carter-K8VT" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 16:56:34 -0500, "Brian Hill" wrote: He'll you can barely call it a war with only 1800 losses in over three years. We lost more men between 1989-1996 ( 18,000+) in the military from normal operations and the Gulf war combined. Uh, haven't you overlooked a little something? Aren't those ~14,000 kids with arms, legs and other various missing body parts also "losses"? Yea it's a shame. You can't stop them from doing what they believe in Carter. Do you not agree? This war isn't going to stop and a lot of us are for it. Including the majority our troops. Theres nothing you can do but complain. B.H. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:48:52 -0500, "Brian Hill"
wrote: Yea it's a shame. You can't stop them from doing what they believe in Carter. Do you not agree? This war isn't going to stop and a lot of us are for it. Including the majority our troops. Theres nothing you can do but complain. B.H. You may think your actions are meaningless and that they won't help, but that is no excuse, you must still act. -- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David wrote: On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:48:52 -0500, "Brian Hill" wrote: Yea it's a shame. You can't stop them from doing what they believe in Carter. Do you not agree? This war isn't going to stop and a lot of us are for it. Including the majority our troops. Theres nothing you can do but complain. B.H. You may think your actions are meaningless and that they won't help, but that is no excuse, you must still act. -- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi I don't think he meant to act stupid, like you do, 'tard boy. dxAce Michigan USA |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 16:56:34 -0500, "Brian Hill"
wrote: It's funny how he wants to overthrow a government that is going out of its way to help spread democracy around the globe and he'll believe any and everything that would help to stop it. I like how the opposition to the war screams that we are killing our people which volunteered to go there in the first place and believe in this campaign. He'll you can barely call it a war with only 1800 losses in over three years. We lost more men between 1989-1996 ( 18,000+) in the military from normal operations and the Gulf war combined. We would have lost 1800 even if we would have stayed home. If only people looked at the numbers and the stats. B.H. This has nothing to do with numbers. It has everything to do with making things worse. It has to do with creating new generations of enemies. The United States should lead the world by example. Not like a ****ty parent who says ''do as I say, not as I do''. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Brian Hill wrote: It's funny how he wants to overthrow a government that is going out of its way to help spread democracy around the globe and he'll believe any and everything that would help to stop it. Who is he..... Which government... I like how the opposition to the war screams that we are killing our people which volunteered to go there in the first place and believe in this campaign. He'll you can barely call it a war with only 1800 losses in over three years. Who is he...... 1,800 people seems like a lot of people to have die needlessly, and the number is a lot higher if you include contractors and other nationalities. And how could we forget the tens of thougnds of Iraqis who have been killed so far. I'm certain the parents and loved ones of those killed would think the losses were of some significance, wouldn't you? We lost more men between 1989-1996 ( 18,000+) in the military from normal operations and the Gulf war combined. We would have lost 1800 even if we would have stayed home. If only people looked at the numbers and the stats. And that justifies the invasion of a soverign country? It must, because the Bush administration has given no other credible justification. George Bush is goiung to do just what Lyndon Johnson did in Viet Nam - leave the cleanup and inevtiable messy exit to another president. That's a fine legacy George!! B.H. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John S." wrote: Brian Hill wrote: It's funny how he wants to overthrow a government that is going out of its way to help spread democracy around the globe and he'll believe any and everything that would help to stop it. Who is he..... Which government... I like how the opposition to the war screams that we are killing our people which volunteered to go there in the first place and believe in this campaign. He'll you can barely call it a war with only 1800 losses in over three years. Who is he...... 1,800 people seems like a lot of people to have die needlessly, and the number is a lot higher if you include contractors and other nationalities. And how could we forget the tens of thougnds of Iraqis who have been killed so far. I'm certain the parents and loved ones of those killed would think the losses were of some significance, wouldn't you? We lost more men between 1989-1996 ( 18,000+) in the military from normal operations and the Gulf war combined. We would have lost 1800 even if we would have stayed home. If only people looked at the numbers and the stats. And that justifies the invasion of a soverign country? It must, because the Bush administration has given no other credible justification. Yada, yada, yada... more left-wing propaganda. Plenty of justification out threre, 'tard. It's just that you and your minions continually dismiss it as false. If you can't come up with anything better you'd best be prepared to lose a lot of nationwide elections in 2006 and 2008. George Bush is goiung to do just what Lyndon Johnson did in Viet Nam - leave the cleanup and inevtiable messy exit to another president. That's a fine legacy George!! Rather than let him leave the cleanup to someone else would you support changing things so that GWB could run again in 2008? That would give you at least one less thing to whine about, wouldn't it? dxAce Michigan USA |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() dxAce wrote: "John S." wrote: Brian Hill wrote: It's funny how he wants to overthrow a government that is going out of its way to help spread democracy around the globe and he'll believe any and everything that would help to stop it. Who is he..... Which government... I like how the opposition to the war screams that we are killing our people which volunteered to go there in the first place and believe in this campaign. He'll you can barely call it a war with only 1800 losses in over three years. Who is he...... 1,800 people seems like a lot of people to have die needlessly, and the number is a lot higher if you include contractors and other nationalities. And how could we forget the tens of thougnds of Iraqis who have been killed so far. I'm certain the parents and loved ones of those killed would think the losses were of some significance, wouldn't you? We lost more men between 1989-1996 ( 18,000+) in the military from normal operations and the Gulf war combined. We would have lost 1800 even if we would have stayed home. If only people looked at the numbers and the stats. And that justifies the invasion of a soverign country? It must, because the Bush administration has given no other credible justification. Yada, yada, yada... more left-wing propaganda. Plenty of justification out threre, 'tard. It's just that you and your minions continually dismiss it as false. Well, lets look at the record so far. We are for all intents and purposes still in charge of a country that has just regained its position as the largest single producer of opium. And George isn't even getting a piece of the action. Just more dead. Great job so far George. And of course we are in charge of another country, but I keep forgetting the reason we are there. Oh, yes...we are still hoping for weapons of mass destruction but more recently we also decided to install democracy. Or did George change the reason once more this week. And in the meanwhile the average citizen has numerous miltia groups to worry about, minimal utilities and a crumbling infrastructure, a US installed government that is imploding and roving gangs that break into houses, shoot or imprison people and stop cars at will. The average citizen of that country sees the U.S. losing its will and getting ready to pull out, as predicted. So what will we leave in our wake.....another Viet Nam to collapse on itself. I'm sure the next president will look forward to that mess. If you can't come up with anything better you'd best be prepared to lose a lot of nationwide elections in 2006 and 2008. Couldn't get much worse actually. Just like the mess Johnson left for Nixon. George Bush is goiung to do just what Lyndon Johnson did in Viet Nam - leave the cleanup and inevtiable messy exit to another president. That's a fine legacy George!! Rather than let him leave the cleanup to someone else would you support changing things so that GWB could run again in 2008? That would give you at least one less thing to whine about, wouldn't it? dxAce Michigan USA |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Grundig Yacht Boy (YB) Radios that are offered World Wide under the Grundig Yacht Boy (YB) Brand Name | Shortwave | |||
Cherry Hill horse racetrack- Mad Cow Disease Link found | Shortwave | |||
WOULD THE TERM "WORLD BAND" BE A SUBSTITUTE FOR SHORTWAVE? | Shortwave | |||
Passport to World Band Radio 2004 | Shortwave |