Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
anyone use SDRs?
i am looking at the Ciaoradio. it is 349 Euros, and i think it comes with the software. i may invest in the software alone at first. i would like an RFspace SDR, because it can record 160 khz band to hard drive. both that and the Gnuradio hardware are too expensive. i am using my sound card for DC to 22 khz reception. my Sony ICF2001 is doing poorly. i suspect there is corrosion in the potentiometers. and i may have blown out the front end somehow. i hear you can mess up a front end and the radio will still work, but you can't hear much of anything. my choices now a 1. repair the Yaesu transceiver 2. use the Yaesu FRG7 receiver 3. get a Sangean or Ciaoradio 4. focus on ELF with an Maudio card i'd love to have an SDR, but i still want to decode RTTY and do other things. so a gen purpose receiver may be easiest. Gravity |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Have ya looked at WinRadio's line?
"gravity" wrote in message reenews.net... anyone use SDRs? i am looking at the Ciaoradio. it is 349 Euros, and i think it comes with the software. i may invest in the software alone at first. i would like an RFspace SDR, because it can record 160 khz band to hard drive. both that and the Gnuradio hardware are too expensive. i am using my sound card for DC to 22 khz reception. my Sony ICF2001 is doing poorly. i suspect there is corrosion in the potentiometers. and i may have blown out the front end somehow. i hear you can mess up a front end and the radio will still work, but you can't hear much of anything. my choices now a 1. repair the Yaesu transceiver 2. use the Yaesu FRG7 receiver 3. get a Sangean or Ciaoradio 4. focus on ELF with an Maudio card i'd love to have an SDR, but i still want to decode RTTY and do other things. so a gen purpose receiver may be easiest. Gravity |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() gravity wrote: anyone use SDRs? i am looking at the Ciaoradio. it is 349 Euros, and i think it comes with the software. i may invest in the software alone at first. i would like an RFspace SDR, because it can record 160 khz band to hard drive. both that and the Gnuradio hardware are too expensive. i am using my sound card for DC to 22 khz reception. my Sony ICF2001 is doing poorly. i suspect there is corrosion in the potentiometers. and i may have blown out the front end somehow. i hear you can mess up a front end and the radio will still work, but you can't hear much of anything. my choices now a 1. repair the Yaesu transceiver 2. use the Yaesu FRG7 receiver 3. get a Sangean or Ciaoradio 4. focus on ELF with an Maudio card i'd love to have an SDR, but i still want to decode RTTY and do other things. so a gen purpose receiver may be easiest. Gravity I think analog front end and RF DSP demo is the way to go. I wish the market would work more on such a product. I don't consider DSP in the analog to be the solution. I'd like to see a FFT panoramic display in the radio, or at least a port to feed it to a PC. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom wrote:
wrote: So I could make a short wave radio out of a laptop using this software? You can make an Extremely Low Frequency radio out of a computer, tunable across the bandwidth of its sound system. You could tune up to about 1/2 the sampling frequency of the sound systems analog-to-digital converter. Typical sample rates are 48kHz but high end systems go up to 192 kHz so the tuning range would be up to 24 kHz and 96 kHz respectively, provided the computer can execute the SDR DSP software fast enough. If you connected an antenna to the microphone input, you might hear something. To tune higher frequencies, you can use a conventional superhet receiver as a tunable downconverter, connecting its last IF (if higher than the computer's audio input range) to a fixed downconverter, e.g., from 455 kHz to 12 kHz. Err, Ummm, well, yeah, in THEORY you could. In practice you'll need to decouple your computer from the antenna pretty well. This means you'll need a very high Q antenna with a very low noise amplifier to isolate it, and a very well isolated DC supply to power the amplifier. If those things exist, you can build your very own VLF receiver from a sound card. In fact, if your sound card can manage a sample rate of at least 120 kSamples/second then you could use it to tune in WWVB at 60 kHz or perhaps the German equivalent at 77 kHz if you can manage to sample at twice that rate. Other than WWVB, I don't think much is still down there. The earth's ionosphere resonates at about 7 Hz if memory serves, so that might be a lower limit to what you might want to try monitoring. The Omega system was decommissioned years ago, though I've heard rumors that some parts of it might still be in service in some corners of the world. Finally, if there are any old FDM coaxial systems nearby, you might detect some leakage from their traffic (I doubt there are any who still use this method to trunk VF traffic together, but if there are a few, you might still hear it) And yes, a very few radios have a third IF at 50 kHz which you could use such a sound card with. That experiment has potential. 73, Jake Brodsky Amateur Radio Station AB3A |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Jake Brodsky wrote: Tom wrote: wrote: So I could make a short wave radio out of a laptop using this software? You can make an Extremely Low Frequency radio out of a computer, tunable across the bandwidth of its sound system. You could tune up to about 1/2 the sampling frequency of the sound systems analog-to-digital converter. Typical sample rates are 48kHz but high end systems go up to 192 kHz so the tuning range would be up to 24 kHz and 96 kHz respectively, provided the computer can execute the SDR DSP software fast enough. If you connected an antenna to the microphone input, you might hear something. To tune higher frequencies, you can use a conventional superhet receiver as a tunable downconverter, connecting its last IF (if higher than the computer's audio input range) to a fixed downconverter, e.g., from 455 kHz to 12 kHz. Err, Ummm, well, yeah, in THEORY you could. In practice you'll need to decouple your computer from the antenna pretty well. This means you'll need a very high Q antenna with a very low noise amplifier to isolate it, and a very well isolated DC supply to power the amplifier. If those things exist, you can build your very own VLF receiver from a sound card. In fact, if your sound card can manage a sample rate of at least 120 kSamples/second then you could use it to tune in WWVB at 60 kHz or perhaps the German equivalent at 77 kHz if you can manage to sample at twice that rate. Other than WWVB, I don't think much is still down there. The earth's ionosphere resonates at about 7 Hz if memory serves, so that might be a lower limit to what you might want to try monitoring. The Omega system was decommissioned years ago, though I've heard rumors that some parts of it might still be in service in some corners of the world. Finally, if there are any old FDM coaxial systems nearby, you might detect some leakage from their traffic (I doubt there are any who still use this method to trunk VF traffic together, but if there are a few, you might still hear it) And yes, a very few radios have a third IF at 50 kHz which you could use such a sound card with. That experiment has potential. 73, Jake Brodsky Amateur Radio Station AB3A Yeah, everything looks easy in theory. Computers are serious noise machines. You've probably seen this website: http://www.vlf.it/ Think of painting a room. Isn't 90% of the work the preparation? Well, in signal analysis, conditioning the signal is a serious chunk of the work. Once you have something clean, then digital analysis can be done. If you do build any of those designs on vlf.it, you may want to investigate better (lower noise) op amps. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jake Brodsky wrote:
Tom wrote: wrote: So I could make a short wave radio out of a laptop using this software? You can make an Extremely Low Frequency radio out of a computer, tunable across the bandwidth of its sound system. You could tune up to about 1/2 the sampling frequency of the sound systems analog-to-digital converter. Typical sample rates are 48kHz but high end systems go up to 192 kHz so the tuning range would be up to 24 kHz and 96 kHz respectively, provided the computer can execute the SDR DSP software fast enough. If you connected an antenna to the microphone input, you might hear something. To tune higher frequencies, you can use a conventional superhet receiver as a tunable downconverter, connecting its last IF (if higher than the computer's audio input range) to a fixed downconverter, e.g., from 455 kHz to 12 kHz. Err, Ummm, well, yeah, in THEORY you could. In practice you'll need to decouple your computer from the antenna pretty well. This means you'll need a very high Q antenna with a very low noise amplifier to isolate it, and a very well isolated DC supply to power the amplifier. If those things exist, you can build your very own VLF receiver from a sound card. In fact, if your sound card can manage a sample rate of at least 120 kSamples/second then you could use it to tune in WWVB at 60 kHz or perhaps the German equivalent at 77 kHz if you can manage to sample at twice that rate. [snip] And yes, a very few radios have a third IF at 50 kHz which you could use such a sound card with. That experiment has potential. 73, Jake Brodsky Amateur Radio Station AB3A The point of my message was that you cannot make a SW radio out of a laptop alone ( the question he asked) but could make a VLF receiver out of a laptop that could be used with a downconverter to tune SW. Many have done so. The downconverter is typically a superhet radio whose last IF is downconverted through an add-on to the audio frequency range. The audio frequency laptop receiver need not have especially high sampling frequency or sample size when used with a downconverter for SW. A 10 kHz wide passband is adequate for most transmission modes and is readily provided by a 48 kHz sample rate - even 24 kHz could be enough. Because the front end tuner has AGC and can regulate levels into the sound card, the latter's A/D converter having something approaching 16 bit resolution will have more than adequate dynamic range - even 8-bits could be sufficient. Of course, the state of the art is for higher resolution A/D converters and higher sampling rates for direct conversion for DSP. As discussed elsewhere, great care must be taken in controlling interference from the SDR to itself, via the antenna or other unintended coupling. Tom |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() gravity wrote: it might make more sense to buy an off the shelf solution e.g. Ciaoradio, RFspace, or Gnu Radio. however it would be cool to homebrew the whole thing! Gravity 73, Jake Brodsky Amateur Radio Station AB3A Gravity, you really bring me down. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tom" wrote:
The point of my message was that you cannot make a SW radio out of a laptop alone yes that was my question And now I'm clear on that...thanks! I've just been debating buying a small portable SW radio as I've gotten completely rid of TV and cable TV and thinking maybe SW radio might be a good replacement for it. Sounds like it best for me to get a dedicated stand lone small SW radio I mistakenly assumed I could put some software on my laptop and make a SW radio out it |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Comparison of six portable radios | Broadcasting | |||
export cb radios | Policy | |||
FS MOTOROLA RADIO'S | Equipment | |||
FS MOTOROLA RADIOS HT1000'S , VISAR'S ,& MAXTRAC'S | Equipment | |||
wtd: EF Johnson Challenger Mobile Radios and Remote Heads | Equipment |