| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
300 ohms for an HF radio? For many reasons I doubt that. Common balanced impedances are 150, ~450 and I have seen a few 600 Ohm RF devices. 300 would be extreme to the limits. What type receiver is this? Terry It is a Realistic DX-160. I had this model as a kid and saw the DX-160 on eBay near by and bought it. Brian |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
dxAce wrote: wrote: 300 ohms for an HF radio? For many reasons I doubt that. Common balanced impedances are 150, ~450 and I have seen a few 600 Ohm RF devices. 300 would be extreme to the limits. What type receiver is this? Terry It is a Realistic DX-160. I had this model as a kid and saw the DX-160 on eBay near by and bought it. The stuff I've seen on it indicates a 50 Ohm input impedence. dxAce Michigan USA For the fun of it I will remove my 4:1 matching transformer between the coax and the reciver connections and connect the coax right to the screw terminals and see what happens. Thanks Brian |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote:
That's weird I didn't notice any difference in radio reception at all between the straight coax feed or thru the 4:1 matching transformer. I've read more and I'm really confused. A 90 foot random wire is unbalanced. A DX-160 with a coax input is unbalanced. What's the balun for? Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM IL Voice: (07)-7424-1667 Fax ONLY: 972-2-648-1443 U.S. Voice: 1-215-821-1838 Visit my 'blog at http://geoffstechno.livejournal.com/ |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote: wrote: That's weird I didn't notice any difference in radio reception at all between the straight coax feed or thru the 4:1 matching transformer. I've read more and I'm really confused. A 90 foot random wire is unbalanced. A DX-160 with a coax input is unbalanced. What's the balun for? Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM IL Voice: (07)-7424-1667 Fax ONLY: 972-2-648-1443 U.S. Voice: 1-215-821-1838 Visit my 'blog at http://geoffstechno.livejournal.com/ I'm getting more confused the more I read replies and on the net and I'm starting to wonder also. But my reasoning is... I thought the input impedance of the reciever at the terminals was 300 ohms. I am using a 4:1 matching transformer at the antenna (currently a 70ft windom) to feed into 75 ohm RG-6 coax. The 4:1 matching transformer at the reciever was to return the input to 300 ohms. I'm going to do some more reading up on this. Brian |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
dxAce wrote: wrote: 300 ohms for an HF radio? For many reasons I doubt that. Common balanced impedances are 150, ~450 and I have seen a few 600 Ohm RF devices. 300 would be extreme to the limits. What type receiver is this? Terry It is a Realistic DX-160. I had this model as a kid and saw the DX-160 on eBay near by and bought it. The stuff I've seen on it indicates a 50 Ohm input impedence. dxAce Michigan USA Thanks dxAce I did some digging and the DX-160 definitely has a low impedance antenna input. I was under the impression that it was 300 ohm. I removed the 4:1 matching transformer that I installed at the reciever which would bring the input back to about 75 ohms and saw no difference in the signal so it may not be that important anyways in a recieve only setup. Not that I doubted you. ![]() Brian |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Balun for "F"type Connectors?????? | Shortwave | |||
| Balun for "F"type Connectors?????? | Shortwave | |||
| Balun for "F"type Connectors?????? | Shortwave | |||
| Balun for "F"type Connectors?????? | Shortwave | |||
| Antenna Questions | Shortwave | |||