Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Togethere wih a fellow amateur I am trying to design an endfeed halfvawe
vertical antenna for 50 MHz. We have encountered som problems regarding the impedance match in the feedpoint. I have surveyed the ARRL Antenna Book and Antennebuch (a German antenna book very popular in Europe). The properties of the antenna and its impedance is well understood. The missing point is how to realise the matching network In order to avoid reinventing the whee: Does anybody have some good links to study practical realisations of the matching network? vy 73 Joergen, OZ7TA |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
J. Kragh wrote:
In order to avoid reinventing the whee: Does anybody have some good links to study practical realisations of the matching network? How about 1.3 meter (4.3 feet) of 450 ohm ladder-line as a series-section-transformer? -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Go back to the ARRL antenna handbooks from the 1970's or 1980's... Look
in the chapter for HF antennas for 160 and 80 meters... Somewhere in there will be the diagram for an end fed long wire using a parallel tank circuit - an inductor and a variable capacitor in parallel... This will work just the same for your end fed half wave vertical on 6 meters... The bottom end of the tank circuit goes to your ground/radials... And the top end goes to the bottom end of your half wave vertical wire... Your transmitter coax has the braid going to the bottom end of the tank circuit and the center feed of the coax is tapped up a few turns from the bottom of the coil to match 50 ohms.. Use a few turns of the coax as a choke for common mode currents on the outside of the braid... Obviously you will not be using components with as much inductance and capacitance as you would for 160 meters... As a guess I would say that for 50 mhz you will be tapping up roughly between 3/4 turn to one and a half turns from the bottom to get a match... This of course depends on the form factor of your coil, i.e. short/fat versus long/skinney.. Trying this on your work bench is the best way.. Make up a coil from #14 AWG solid house wiring and a variable capacitor, use a length of the house wiring for the radials and vertical and experiment... Another method is the J Pole matching system.. Look in chapter 18 of the current ARRL Antenna Handbook... cheers denny / k8do |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"J. Kragh" wrote in
k: Togethere wih a fellow amateur I am trying to design an endfeed halfvawe vertical antenna for 50 MHz. We have encountered som problems regarding the impedance match in the feedpoint. I have surveyed the ARRL Antenna Book and Antennebuch (a German antenna book very popular in Europe). The properties of the antenna and its impedance is well understood. The missing point is how to realise the matching network In order to avoid reinventing the whee: Does anybody have some good links to study practical realisations of the matching network? vy 73 Joergen, OZ7TA An endfed halfwave has inductive reactance, ISTR. If you add another 1/8 wave to it, you reverse the sign of the reactance, thereby allowing an inductance to tune out the reactance. Ground one end of the inductor and tap down with the coax center conductor for a 50 ohm match--Voila! A 5/8 wave vertical! Jeff |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "J. Kragh" wrote in message k... Togethere wih a fellow amateur I am trying to design an endfeed halfvawe vertical antenna for 50 MHz. How about a zepp antenna fed with open wire, with the antenna running vertically. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() We have encountered som problems regarding the impedance match in the feedpoint. I have surveyed the ARRL Antenna Book and Antennebuch (a German antenna book very popular in Europe). The properties of the antenna and its impedance is well understood. The missing point is how to realise the matching network In order to avoid reinventing the whee: Does anybody have some good links to study practical realisations of the matching network? vy 73 Joergen, OZ7TA Google WB6BLD. Or just go to http://tonnesoftware.com/piel.html Jim has design software of both Pi and L networks that will perfectly match the anticipated impedance to 50 Ohms. Other interesting Amateur Radio associated software as well and free student versions. W4ZCB |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 14:25:35 +0200, "J. Kragh"
wrote: In order to avoid reinventing the whee: Does anybody have some good links to study practical realisations of the matching network? Hi Joergen, http://www.70mhz.org/halfwav.htm http://www.qsl.net/dk7zb/6m/Vertical.htm http://www.dxzone.com/cgi-bin/dir/jump2.cgi?ID=13226 (duplicate) 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The simplest fed is a L network with the C at the transmitter end
and the antenna at the unterminated inductor end. Works best in the radiator is slightly capacitive looking. Specificallly check the article "feeding the EDZ" as that talks about the problem at hand. Allison Not really, the capacitor goes on the end of the coil closest to the higher impedance. I'm certain his half wave will be appreciably above 50 Ohms. Mine's about 2600 Ohms. W4ZCB |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() How do all these various matching schemes affect bandwidth? 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH For the "L", it depends on the Q of the "L" network. You're not in charge of that, you have to take the Q that the transform gives you. With a constant inductor value, I can get pretty close to 1:1 clear across the band just by varying the capacitor value for the frequency. Of course, if you don't have any adjustable "C", YMMV. I'd think you need to get to a pretty high frequency before you didn't have to add "C" to whatever exists, but the big advantage of Voltage feed is that the current to the "Ground" is minimal. When you don't know that your ground is zero Ohms, you're better off putting as little current into it as possible. W4ZCB |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|