Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 14:32:19 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote: Wow, from 0.2 dB to 0.4 dB. :-) Would the following work for measuring the wet/dry losses of 1/2 wavelength of ladder-line shorted at one end and an MFJ-259B on the other end? Measure the resonant purely resistive impedance at the open end. Wet the ladder-line and repeat the procedure. Calculate the losses. If the line were lossless, zero ohms would be read. The deviation away from zero ohms yields the magnitude of the loss in the line at the 1/2 wavelength resonant frequency. That's about 8.8 MHz for 50 ft. of ladder-line. You are assuming something that I am not. That is the measurements were accurate. Measuring anything to a fraction of a dB is most difficult - even with the best of equipment and mine was not. Danny, K6MHE |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John, N9JG wrote:
The author used a wetting agent. "Cecil Moore" wrote in message m... John, N9JG wrote: An excellent article. It appears to indicate that at 7 MHz a feed line made from 100' of Wireman 554 window line would have a loss of about 2 db when the line is wet. When the line is dry, the loss is insignificant. I've often wondered how someone "wets" a vertical feedline without using soap. So is the lesson that Ladder line sucks, or is it that we shouldn't wash our ladder line with soap and water? 8^) Has anyone run tests on what "real" (open) ladder line does when you spray it with wetting agent and water? - 73 de Mike KB3EIA - |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 20:24:59 -0700, Danny Richardson
wrote: On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 02:48:16 GMT, Cecil Moore wrote: Danny Richardson wrote: Just drop by my qth anytime between November and May. How do you keep the water on the feedline? Mine always beads up and falls to the ground. Here's a photo of a piece of Danny's line (Wireman 552), after it set around in the Arizona 5% humidity for a while It was still green when I got it. http://www.k6mhe.com/n7ws/MossyLine.jpg What do you suppose the dielectic properties are when that stuff totally bridges the line and is wet? I don't do anything. Ever heard of Oregon mist? When I first moved up here on the northern California coast I put up a doublet feeding it with window line. The next spring when I dropped the antenna for some maintenance I found moss growing on the feed line.Need I say it was replaced with something better? |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wes Stewart wrote:
Here's a photo of a piece of Danny's line (Wireman 552), after it set around in the Arizona 5% humidity for a while It was still green when I got it. http://www.k6mhe.com/n7ws/MossyLine.jpg That's pretty amazing. East Texas is relatively damp and green but I've never had moss growing on my ladder- line. Here, the rain comes and goes and doesn't last very long. What do you suppose the dielectic properties are when that stuff totally bridges the line and is wet? Sounds like a useful project for someone. The only thing on my ladder-line at the moment is a green six-inch long lizard looking at me through the window pane. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 15:23:07 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote: John, N9JG wrote: The author used a wetting agent. "Cecil Moore" wrote in message m... John, N9JG wrote: An excellent article. It appears to indicate that at 7 MHz a feed line made from 100' of Wireman 554 window line would have a loss of about 2 db when the line is wet. When the line is dry, the loss is insignificant. I've often wondered how someone "wets" a vertical feedline without using soap. So is the lesson that Ladder line sucks, or is it that we shouldn't wash our ladder line with soap and water? 8^) Some suggest coating the ladder line with various forms of waxes, eg silicon car polish for various reasons, including minimising the change to the line characteristics with precipitation. I don't know if there is reliable evidence as to the efficacy of these measures, and what compounds are to be preferred. I see it discussed on eham, but that doesn't necessarily mean it is bunk! I don't know that it is fair to say that "Ladder line sucks", but it is well known that it is adversely affected by moisture. Ladder line is not so good wet or dry as to disregard its losses in all situations (ie in general). Like everything, it has its limitations, and with knowledge we can use it effectively within those limitations. Owen -- |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Wes Stewart wrote: Here's a photo of a piece of Danny's line (Wireman 552), after it set around in the Arizona 5% humidity for a while It was still green when I got it. http://www.k6mhe.com/n7ws/MossyLine.jpg That's pretty amazing. East Texas is relatively damp and green but I've never had moss growing on my ladder- line. Here, the rain comes and goes and doesn't last very long. What do you suppose the dielectic properties are when that stuff totally bridges the line and is wet? Sounds like a useful project for someone. The only thing on my ladder-line at the moment is a green six-inch long lizard looking at me through the window pane. You sure that ain't just a reflection? 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wes Stewart wrote:
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 20:24:59 -0700, Danny Richardson wrote: On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 02:48:16 GMT, Cecil Moore wrote: Danny Richardson wrote: Just drop by my qth anytime between November and May. How do you keep the water on the feedline? Mine always beads up and falls to the ground. Here's a photo of a piece of Danny's line (Wireman 552), after it set around in the Arizona 5% humidity for a while It was still green when I got it. http://www.k6mhe.com/n7ws/MossyLine.jpg What do you suppose the dielectic properties are when that stuff totally bridges the line and is wet? Seems as if some of us are taking special circumstances and applying them to all cases. I have the same type of line, and after several years, it's still glossy, and the water beads up on it. So should I quit using it because he has problems, or should he keep using it because I don't? ;^) - 73 de mike KB3EIA - |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Donaly wrote:
You sure that ain't just a reflection? :-0 Nope, it's one of these critters called an Anole. Locals call them chameleons because they can change their colors from green to brown. http://www.kingsnake.com/hudspeth/AnoleClose1.jpg -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Owen Duffy wrote:
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 15:23:07 -0400, Mike Coslo wrote: John, N9JG wrote: The author used a wetting agent. "Cecil Moore" wrote in message .com... John, N9JG wrote: An excellent article. It appears to indicate that at 7 MHz a feed line made from 100' of Wireman 554 window line would have a loss of about 2 db when the line is wet. When the line is dry, the loss is insignificant. I've often wondered how someone "wets" a vertical feedline without using soap. So is the lesson that Ladder line sucks, or is it that we shouldn't wash our ladder line with soap and water? 8^) Some suggest coating the ladder line with various forms of waxes, eg silicon car polish for various reasons, including minimising the change to the line characteristics with precipitation. Hi Owen. I doubt that those would help much, as PE has some pretty impressive characteristics. I suspect that waxes and such will just degrade performance. And I can just imagine the look my XYL would give me if I told her I was going to go wax my line! ;^) I don't know if there is reliable evidence as to the efficacy of these measures, and what compounds are to be preferred. I see it discussed on eham, but that doesn't necessarily mean it is bunk! I don't know that it is fair to say that "Ladder line sucks", but it is well known that it is adversely affected by moisture. Ladder line is not so good wet or dry as to disregard its losses in all situations (ie in general). I wonder what the exact mechanism is? PE has some decent water absorption characteristics, 24 hour tests show almost no absorption for low density, and none for the high density and up versions. Like everything, it has its limitations, and with knowledge we can use it effectively within those limitations. I daresay you are right. - 73 de Mike KB3EIA - |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Tom Donaly wrote: You sure that ain't just a reflection? :-0 Nope, it's one of these critters called an Anole. Locals call them chameleons because they can change their colors from green to brown. Cute little duffer! - 73 de Mike KB3EIA - |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Antenna reception theory | Antenna | |||
SWR - wtf? | CB | |||
SWR - wtf? | Antenna | |||
swr question | Antenna | |||
Antenna Suggestions and Lightning Protection | Shortwave |