Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 22nd 06, 03:08 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 83
Default Use of lattice line to feed dipole

I have just strung a dipole of length of about 110 feet between a tree and
my house chimney. The primary use of the antenna will be 80 and 40 meters,
with occasional use on the bands between 40 and 10 meters. My junk box
contains a reel of open wire feeder (#16 solid copper wires with 1 inch
white plastic spacers spaced about every 5 inches), which would run from my
Johnson KW Matchbox to the dipole's center insulator.

I have never used this type of feed line before, and in fact I believe its
intended use was as a low-loss feed for TV. I am wondering if I could
eliminate a fair amount of aggravation for myself by using a newer
poly-coated window-type ladder line with #14 stranded copper-clad conductors
for the feeder. Can this type of feeder handle high power? For skimpy specs
on the ladder-line feed see
http://tinyurl.com/ouzye


  #2   Report Post  
Old September 22nd 06, 03:52 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 115
Default Use of lattice line to feed dipole

On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 01:08:08 GMT, "John, N9JG"
wrote:

I have just strung a dipole of length of about 110 feet between a tree and
my house chimney. The primary use of the antenna will be 80 and 40 meters,
with occasional use on the bands between 40 and 10 meters. My junk box
contains a reel of open wire feeder (#16 solid copper wires with 1 inch
white plastic spacers spaced about every 5 inches), which would run from my
Johnson KW Matchbox to the dipole's center insulator.

I have never used this type of feed line before, and in fact I believe its
intended use was as a low-loss feed for TV. I am wondering if I could
eliminate a fair amount of aggravation for myself by using a newer
poly-coated window-type ladder line with #14 stranded copper-clad conductors
for the feeder. Can this type of feeder handle high power? For skimpy specs
on the ladder-line feed see
http://tinyurl.com/ouzye


Go with the junk box stuff. It will have lower losses - especially
when it is wet. A much better choice.

Danny, K6MHE




  #3   Report Post  
Old September 22nd 06, 06:37 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 88
Default Use of lattice line to feed dipole

Concure. Plus it will have a MUCH lower wind resistance. My window type
feeders with copperweld wire break about once a year due to wind
whipping. Good choice!

Paul, KD7HB

Danny Richardson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 01:08:08 GMT, "John, N9JG"
wrote:

I have just strung a dipole of length of about 110 feet between a tree and
my house chimney. The primary use of the antenna will be 80 and 40 meters,
with occasional use on the bands between 40 and 10 meters. My junk box
contains a reel of open wire feeder (#16 solid copper wires with 1 inch
white plastic spacers spaced about every 5 inches), which would run from my
Johnson KW Matchbox to the dipole's center insulator.

I have never used this type of feed line before, and in fact I believe its
intended use was as a low-loss feed for TV. I am wondering if I could
eliminate a fair amount of aggravation for myself by using a newer
poly-coated window-type ladder line with #14 stranded copper-clad conductors
for the feeder. Can this type of feeder handle high power? For skimpy specs
on the ladder-line feed see
http://tinyurl.com/ouzye


Go with the junk box stuff. It will have lower losses - especially
when it is wet. A much better choice.

Danny, K6MHE




  #4   Report Post  
Old September 23rd 06, 12:46 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 83
Default Use of lattice line to feed dipole

I certainly appreciate the comments and advice from you and the other
respondents.
-- John, N9JG

"Edmund H. Ramm" wrote in message
...
In "John, N9JG"
writes:

[...]
My junk box contains a reel of open wire feeder (#16 solid copper
wires with 1 inch white plastic spacers


Zo abt 450 Ohms.

spaced about every 5 inches), which would run from my Johnson KW
Matchbox to the dipole's center insulator.


[...]
I am wondering if I could eliminate a fair amount of aggravation for
myself by using a newer poly-coated window-type ladder line with #14
stranded copper-clad conductors for the feeder.


You'd be in for problems. The windowed (not so)open-wire line is
almost as susceptible to humidity and dirt as twinlead. If you want
to buy open-wire line, get W7FG's 600 Ohms "real ladder line".

If you use the feedline from your junkbox, make sure it doesn't
swing in the wind. Solid copper wire will fatigue (and break) much
sooner than the stranded variety.

Can this type of feeder handle high power?
[...]


More power than RG-213 et.al., even more so when unmatched.

73, Eddi ._._.
--
e-mail: dk3uz AT darc DOT de | AMPRNET:
If replying to a Usenet article, please use above e-mail address.
Linux/m68k, the best U**x ever to hit an Atari!



  #5   Report Post  
Old September 23rd 06, 01:05 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 115
Default Use of lattice line to feed dipole

On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 22:46:22 GMT, "John, N9JG"
wrote:

I certainly appreciate the comments and advice from you and the other
respondents.
-- John, N9JG


John,

I think you will benefit from this.

http://k6mhe.com/n7ws/Ladder_Line.pdf

Danny, K6MHE




  #6   Report Post  
Old September 23rd 06, 02:48 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 83
Default Use of lattice line to feed dipole

An excellent article. It appears to indicate that at 7 MHz a feed line made
from 100' of Wireman 554 window line would have a loss of about 2 db when
the line is wet. When the line is dry, the loss is insignificant.

"Danny Richardson" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 22:46:22 GMT, "John, N9JG"
wrote:

I certainly appreciate the comments and advice from you and the other
respondents.
-- John, N9JG


John,

I think you will benefit from this.

http://k6mhe.com/n7ws/Ladder_Line.pdf

Danny, K6MHE




  #7   Report Post  
Old September 23rd 06, 03:50 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,614
Default Use of lattice line to feed dipole

John, N9JG wrote:
An excellent article. It appears to indicate that at 7 MHz a feed line made
from 100' of Wireman 554 window line would have a loss of about 2 db when
the line is wet. When the line is dry, the loss is insignificant.


I've often wondered how someone "wets" a vertical feedline
without using soap.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com
  #8   Report Post  
Old September 23rd 06, 04:37 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 115
Default Use of lattice line to feed dipole

On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 01:50:54 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote:

I've often wondered how someone "wets" a vertical feedline
without using soap.


Cecil,

Just drop by my qth anytime between November and May.

Danny, K6MHE





  #9   Report Post  
Old September 23rd 06, 04:39 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 168
Default Use of lattice line to feed dipole

On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 00:48:43 GMT, "John, N9JG"
wrote:

An excellent article. It appears to indicate that at 7 MHz a feed line made
from 100' of Wireman 554 window line would have a loss of about 2 db when
the line is wet. When the line is dry, the loss is insignificant.


Is that the matched line loss you are talking about.

These lines aren't always or even often operated at very low VSWR, so
it may be unwise to dismiss the loss as insignificant in the general
sense.

Owen
--
  #10   Report Post  
Old September 23rd 06, 04:48 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,614
Default Use of lattice line to feed dipole

Danny Richardson wrote:
Just drop by my qth anytime between November and May.


How do you keep the water on the feedline? Mine
always beads up and falls to the ground.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Antenna reception theory Paul Taylor Antenna 176 December 25th 05 11:15 PM
SWR - wtf? john d CB 136 July 2nd 05 09:31 PM
SWR - wtf? Roy Lewallen Antenna 110 July 1st 05 06:30 AM
swr question Fred W4JLE Antenna 27 June 1st 05 02:45 AM
Antenna Suggestions and Lightning Protection § Dr. Artaud § Shortwave 71 April 26th 05 05:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017