Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is there such a thing as a 2 mtr omnidirectional
vertical beam antenna? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Marvin Rosen wrote:
Is there such a thing as a 2 mtr omnidirectional vertical beam antenna? 2m antennas that focus radiation in the horizontal are not usually called beams. They are called phased arrays and some are very high gain and omnidirectional. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Marvin, Depends on what you mean by 'beam'. If you mean a yagi or quad type directional antenna, no. If you mean an omnidirectional antenna with gain, yes. But if it's an omnidirectional antenna with gain, it isn't a 'beam', in the common sense or use of the word, is it... 'Doc |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Marvin Rosen" wrote in message ... Is there such a thing as a 2 mtr omnidirectional vertical beam antenna? You want an omnidirectional directional antenna?! Nope, there isn't any such thing. An omnidirectional antenna radiates equally in ALL directions. If you think of all the power flowing into an antenna being radiated out, equally illuminating every unit area of an imaginary sphere around the antenna, then that's an isotropic radiator. Since ALL the input power is radiated, you never get any more efficient than that. If you distort the radiation pattern, so that power isn't equal for every unit area of that sphere, you now have a directional antenna. You get an apparent gain in a certain direction because you have "stolen" some power from other directions. No free lunch, etc. If you get sloppy with your definition of omnidirectional, you might try to call something like a quarter-wave vertical rod above a ground plane is an omnidirectional antenna. Assuming perfect construction, this antenna radiates equally well in all azimuths. But it sure doesn't radiate equally well at all elevations. Either way, this isn't a "beam" antenna. And once you array a group of dipoles or loops to form a classic beam antenna, you don't have omni-directional radiation vertically or horizontally. -- Ed WB6WSN |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, Ed .. but for a beginner, sometimes a picture is worth a lot ..
Ed Price wrote: "Marvin Rosen" wrote in message ... Is there such a thing as a 2 mtr omnidirectional vertical beam antenna? You want an omnidirectional directional antenna?! Nope, there isn't any such thing. Maybe if he visualized a round balloon on a table it might help. Imagine then taking your hand and pressing it on the top. That squishes down the top toward the bottom, sorta flattening the balloon. All of the sides bulge out. In a way, that is what we are talking about. Everything extra we get in some direction comes at the expense of some other direction! But if the earth is the table, looking at it that way, you can reach a lot more people if you stop reaching for the stars... W5WQN - I keep forgeeting to add that to my posts in this group, sorry. -- -- Sleep well; OS2's still awake! ![]() Mike Luther |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Uh...no? "Omnidirectional" and "beam" are mutually exclusive terms. It's
either one or the other...You can have a bi-directional beam, but if it's omnidirectional, it's either not a beam at all, or a really, really poor one... - KI6PR "Marvin Rosen" wrote Is there such a thing as a 2 mtr omnidirectional vertical beam antenna? |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Ed, How about a vertical array antenna? It's as omnidirectional as an antenna can get in a 'real world' situation, and it does have gain over a single element antenna. Describing it with the commonly accepted definition of a 'beam' isn't correct/valid, (I agree with you there), but it fills the requirements of the original post (omnidirectional + gain). 'Doc |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I figured he meant any omnidirectional gain over a vertical 1/2 wave antenna or
some other reference. When the "gain" of something is discussed it must always imply a ratio of the signal strength with respect to some reference. Common references are a so-called dipole and an isotropic antenna. For both references you can have omnidirectional gain. My Cushcraft 2-m Ringo Ranger is omnidirection and has gain. 73 de Jack, K9CUN |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "'Doc" wrote in message ... Ed, How about a vertical array antenna? It's as omnidirectional as an antenna can get in a 'real world' situation, and it does have gain over a single element antenna. Describing it with the commonly accepted definition of a 'beam' isn't correct/valid, (I agree with you there), but it fills the requirements of the original post (omnidirectional + gain). 'Doc What do you mean by a "vertical array"? What are the basic radiating elements, loops or dipoles? And then, how many replications and in what physical location is this "array"? Could you be confusing "omnidirectional" with "omniazimuth"? Another poster visualized this antenna pattern as a squashed (mmmmmmmm) doughnut. Equal radiation to all points on the horizon, all the way around the compass. But that pattern isn't omnidirectional. For instance, what about straight overhead? Is the field as strong there as at the horizon? Ed wb6wsn |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ed Price" wrote in message
news ![]() ...Could you be confusing "omnidirectional" with "omniazimuth"? ... radiation to all points on the horizon, all the way around the compass. But that pattern isn't omnidirectional. For instance, what about straight overhead? Is the field as strong there as at the horizon? ______________ The convention in FM/TV broadcasting is to consider only the radiation directed toward, and for a few degrees below the horizontal plane when characterising the shape of a radiation pattern as directional or not. This is the radiation sector that best serves the purposes of the broadcast station: to provide the strongest signal to the most receivers. Radiation toward other elevation angles is largely wasted. Broadcasters use arrays of antenna elements aligned on a vertical axis to produce maximum gain in, and near the horizontal plane. Typically each of these elements is omnidirectional in the azimuth plane, arrayed at about 1 lambda vertical intervals, and driven with equal power and phase. A slide show and tech papers on these topics are available following the "Papers" button at http://rfry.org. R. Fry |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Advice wanted:T-match Coax Balun for Yagi Beam | Antenna | |||
Yagi / Beam antenna theory question... | Antenna | |||
small 10 meter beam for satellite RX | Antenna | |||
Vee Beam info needed | Antenna | |||
TA-33 Beam question | Antenna |