Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
hello all,
i research dimension, and infos, for construction antenna LW multibandes 1.8 too 50 MHZ includes WARC bands. balun its ??? 4/1 8/1 ??? tks a lot on3vhf laurent -- www.on3vhf.be.tf locator: JO20EM |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
pierard laurent wrote:
hello all, i research dimension, and infos, for construction antenna LW multibandes 1.8 too 50 MHZ includes WARC bands. balun its ??? 4/1 8/1 ??? tks a lot on3vhf laurent The B&W antennas are 600 ohm and 12:1 baluns. Dave WD9BDZ |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
tks a lot dear Dave.
73s laurent on3vhf "David G. Nagel" a écrit dans le message de news: ... pierard laurent wrote: hello all, i research dimension, and infos, for construction antenna LW multibandes 1.8 too 50 MHZ includes WARC bands. balun its ??? 4/1 8/1 ??? tks a lot on3vhf laurent The B&W antennas are 600 ohm and 12:1 baluns. Dave WD9BDZ |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
pierard laurent wrote:
hello all, i research dimension, and infos, for construction antenna LW multibandes 1.8 too 50 MHZ includes WARC bands. balun its ??? 4/1 8/1 ??? tks a lot on3vhf laurent Fritzel FD4 is a Windom antenna, not a broadband terminated dipole. it use 6:1 balun. Nevertherless its just a plain old coaxial fed windom. Greg |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:25:59 -0700, 62736748382 wrote:
pierard laurent wrote: hello all, i research dimension, and infos, for construction antenna LW multibandes 1.8 too 50 MHZ includes WARC bands. balun its ??? 4/1 8/1 ??? tks a lot on3vhf laurent Fritzel FD4 is a Windom antenna, not a broadband terminated dipole. it use 6:1 balun. Nevertherless its just a plain old coaxial fed windom. Why do people continue to call an off-center-fed-dippole a Windom? Danny, K6MHE |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Danny Richardson wrote:
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:25:59 -0700, 62736748382 wrote: pierard laurent wrote: hello all, i research dimension, and infos, for construction antenna LW multibandes 1.8 too 50 MHZ includes WARC bands. balun its ??? 4/1 8/1 ??? tks a lot on3vhf laurent Fritzel FD4 is a Windom antenna, not a broadband terminated dipole. it use 6:1 balun. Nevertherless its just a plain old coaxial fed windom. Why do people continue to call an off-center-fed-dippole a Windom? Danny, K6MHE OCF, i think is the new term for something old. Nothing new in radio, it just goes around in a circle and comes back with a new name. Watch out for the G5RV it will come back as the tuner intergrated dipole TID, since so many will forget what a G5RV is the TID will be a new miracle antenna. I could be wrong here. They already selling antennas with resistors in them, so who knows whats next. I wonder when someone will release the light globe antenna for restricted space. After all we know we can work DX with a dummy load. I thought the mushroom principle was dead in ham radio, but some still seem to believe that keeping you in the dark and feeding your BS is good marketing practice. Greg |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 17:39:53 -0700, 62736748382 wrote:
Danny Richardson wrote: Fritzel FD4 is a Windom antenna, not a broadband terminated dipole. it use 6:1 balun. Nevertherless its just a plain old coaxial fed windom. Why do people continue to call an off-center-fed-dippole a Windom? Danny, K6MHE OCF, i think is the new term for something old. Nothing new in radio, it just goes around in a circle and comes back with a new name. Watch out for the G5RV it will come back as the tuner intergrated dipole TID, since so many will forget what a G5RV is the TID will be a new miracle antenna. I could be wrong here. They already selling antennas with resistors in them, so who knows whats next. I wonder when someone will release the light globe antenna for restricted space. After all we know we can work DX with a dummy load. I thought the mushroom principle was dead in ham radio, but some still seem to believe that keeping you in the dark and feeding your BS is good marketing practice. An OCFD is NOT a Windom and visa versa. They are two different antenna systems. Danny, K6MHE |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Danny Richardson wrote:
An OCFD is NOT a Windom and visa versa. They are two different antenna systems. Yes, but the Windom name has been hijacked, e.g. Carolina Windom. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|