Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Rick" wrote in message ... Since I began using Outlook Express as my newsreader I have been able to implement subject line filters which are nearly perfect in eliminating the QRM. Every few days I add to this filter as needed. If you use Outlook Express and are not familiar with filters you are missing out on a real useful feature. All you have to do is hit tools/message rules/News. Then build a new filter "where the subject line contains words" and then put in the words that will be used to eliminate the QRM. Works as good as a Wouff Hong. Here's my current list: contains 'cw-forever' or 'slow code' or 'democrat' or 'Fcc took' or 'rumsfeld' or 'cw' or 'poll' or 'dumber' or 'blog' or 'crapthon' or 'crapathon' or 'cattle' or '...' or 'flonking' or 'punce' or 'passed tech' Rick K2XT with the punce gotcha he wonders why I simple don't bother to ty impoving my spelling do u hav anyting cognet two say? my blog http://www.marksspamblog.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"olekinghole9007" wrote in
oups.com: Lloyd Wiseman wrote: "Rick" wrote in : Works as good as a Wouff Hong. I should have said "Works ALMOST as well as a Wouff Hong." Because a real Wouff Hong, properly administered, would eliminate not only the QRM but the QRM'er - a beautiful thing. Rick K2XT Get used to the QRM, because after CW is eliminated you're going to wish your rig did come with Rettysnitch and wouff hong filters... But I forget, due to the lack of support for good tests a lot of you people must like hearing Lids. SC Wouff Hong ??? Rettysnitch ??? WTF are we in the 19th Century here??? Baaaaaaaaa hahahahhahahahahhahaha!!!!!!! Jeezus H Christmas on a rocket powered sled at the Nevada test site will you OBSOLETE hams PLEASE join the 21st century. I mean consider that the terms Wouff Hong and Rettysnitch DO NOT even appear ANYPLACE on or within Wikipedia! That alone should tell you something! (..of course now you can be some crusty old fart, cloistered ham radio nerd or some asshole who took the "Bash Book" route to get his ham license will now dash up and create an entry in Wikipaeda just to inflate his own ego and asscheeks and claim he did something.....go ahead, be my guest! In the meantime I'm heading back to 20 Meters to have some fun with the contest freaks. I made up a callsign and semi-rare section and these CLOWN-testers are beating a path to my speaker to work me just so they can see their callsign in print in some half-ass magazine from CT. How F-N pathetic! ) --- PFHBLTTT!!!!!!!! ps: you should have seen how many DX clowntesters I duped a few weeks ago using a "creative" callsign, section and running 10 watts into the 40M dipole instead of the beam...suckers! You shouldn't do things like that, the FCC will come after you like they went after old Two-Test. SC |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The FAQ (Well, Question 1, at least) | Homebrew | |||
The FAQ (Well, Question 1, at least) | General | |||
WHERE ARE ALL THE TOUGH GUYS IN THIS SHORTWAVE NEWSGROUP? | Shortwave | |||
WHERE ARE ALL THE TOUGH GUYS IN THIS SHORTWAVE NEWSGROUP? | Shortwave | |||
WHERE ARE ALL THE TOUGH GUYS IN THIS SHORTWAVE NEWSGROUP? | General |