Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm a confused radio neophyte trying to compare two antennas using an ICOM
R8500... For the most part both the AOR MA-500 mobile whip and Nil-Jon Super M base seem to capture the same signals but the AOR generally has a much lower "noise floor". That is to say, I can hear clearer voice via the AOR because there is less background noise and scans "work" better because the squelch can be set to a lower threshold. Same physical location and connection cable using each antenna. I listen to a wide range of frequencies but have noticed this phenomenon most in 750 - 950 MHz. What causes this difference and how I can improve the Nil-Jon? The AOR MA500 is a stainless steel 29 inch magnet mount mobile scanner antenna covering 25 to 1300 MHz. Peak performance is from approximately 100 to 400 MHz. The NIL-JON Super M Base is a versatile VHF-UHF antenna providing very high performance. The receive range is 25 to 1300 MHz. It may be used for transceive applications at these frequencies: 144-148 and 435-465 MHz. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |