Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#62
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: wrote: From: on Sat, Dec 30 2006 3:42 am wrote: wrote: Last night I did a quick copy of the All-Time Posters on RRAP and here is what they had for 28 Dec 06: -me- 6,191 No, Len, that number is way too low. Google provided it. I just copied the numbers that Google put up of the TOP TEN. shrug It's inaccurate. You did not interrogate Google correctly, and so the number you gave is much lower than the actual number. If you can't be accurate, why should anyone trust you? says the Top Ten listing is "wrong." Nope. I'm saying *you* are giving a number that is very inaccurate. 6,191 is a lot less than 10,993. That's a NEW territory of criticsm for him! :-) "Criticsm"? The WORST I can be accused of is being incomplete. :-) In error is more like it. cribs license class totals from the AH0A website and implies they are "his" since he NEVER shows the origin of his data. shrug No, that is not correct. The totals I post every two weeks do not come from AH0A. I have posted my source here. You are either too lazy or too incompetent to find it ;-) If your ability to count *your own postings* results in a number that is so inaccurate, why should anyone trust your counts of other things? If I had "counted my own postings" I would have done so and listed all my 'handles' (screennames). :-) But you didn't. That means you intentionally posted a number that was too low. Some would say you tried to deceive us. If your ability to represent your own history of posting to rrap is so error-filled, why should anyone trust your recounting of other history? Jim, would you mind tallying up all of your postings under all of your screen names? Thanks a bunch. Brian, you're asking the impossible! :-) Not impossible at all. Just unlikely. So why should anyone trust anything you say when you run around tallying up everyones posting totals except your own? Personal opinion: you can't be trusted. ;^) |
#63
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
All this stuff about dumbing down America is garbage. This lady works
for the CDC and has this kind of attitude? Thats scary. By the same token, I guess a physician is less of a doctor, is 'dumb' because he uses an MRI to make a diagnosis rather than cutting someone open for exploratory surgery. Telegraphy (in its simplest form, smoke signals) has been around for thousands of years, keys for a bit over 200. Its time to move on people. CW is a nice skill to have, as are woodworking, horseback riding and knitting. But not one of them is relevant to life in the 21st century. not even a little bit. If everyone with those abilities fell off the planet right now, the world would hardly notice the loss. Thats just the way it is. Amatuer Radio operators can be innovators that move along with the times and embrace new opportunities (as we have done for the most part) or we can keep crying about how things were in the good old days and become (extinct) dinosaurs. Now if you will excuse me I need to start studying for my General. Stefan Wolfe wrote: SAN FRANCISCO: It may be the ultimate SOS. Morse Code is in distress. ...... ...... While the decision had been expected, some ham radio operators fear that their exclusive club has been opened to the unwashed masses - and that the very survival of Morse Code is in question. ...... The demise of the Morse requirement, however, could be a boon for ham radio itself. After the FCC decision, demand for information about radio licenses surged from about 200 in a typical weekend to about 500, according to the American Radio Relay League, an organization representing ham radio operators. ...... "It's part of the dumbing down of America," said Nancy Kott, editor of World Radio magazine and a field representative for the Centers for Disease of Control and Prevention in Metamora, Michigan. "We live in a society today that wants something for nothing." A female in a mostly male radio world, Kott is one of about 660,000 licensed ham operators in the United States and is the U.S. leader of Fists CW Club, an organization that calls itself the International Morse Preservation Society. ... So true, Ms. Kott... |
#64
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "DaveC" wrote in message Now if you will excuse me I need to start studying for my General. Good one Dave. When you start "studying" for your general you will see how dumbed down and simple it is and you might marvel at why the QPC would have ever even bothered to commit such a "test" to publication. It may also occur to you that, as the the Geico commercial says, it is so easy a caveman could do it. Actually I would move back perhaps 25 millions earlier in the evolutionary cycle and say it is so easy, even a monkey could do it. And monkeys it will be. The new Monkey General class :-) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life. | Policy | |||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs? | General | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
a great read | CB | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | CB |