Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am using a multi-switch to change radios and antennas. One of those MFJ
1700Bs. I get different SWR readings depending upon where I place the bridge in the tangle of wires that go into and out of the switch. If I take the switch out of the equation I get very low SWR. With it in I get 2.5:1. All of the coax has a common ground so the OCF windom also shares a common ground with the coax going up to the beam and all the radios. All grounds are starred at the back of the antenna tuner and run to earth. I am wondering - does the common connection mean the coax shield to the beam is becoming a part of the OCF windom antenna and vice-versa? Would it therefore be adviseable to put current chokes on all the ins and outs of the switch? Other comments? k4ia Buck Fredericksburg, VA |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 15:06:40 GMT, "Teri Buck"
wrote: I am using a multi-switch to change radios and antennas. One of those MFJ 1700Bs. I get different SWR readings depending upon where I place the bridge in the tangle of wires that go into and out of the switch. If I take the switch out of the equation I get very low SWR. With it in I get 2.5:1. All of the coax has a common ground so the OCF windom also shares a common ground with the coax going up to the beam and all the radios. All grounds are starred at the back of the antenna tuner and run to earth. I am wondering - does the common connection mean the coax shield to the beam is becoming a part of the OCF windom antenna and vice-versa? Would it therefore be adviseable to put current chokes on all the ins and outs of the switch? Other comments? k4ia Buck Based upon your description you can bet the farm you've got common mode problems. Off center fed dipoles (that's what you have - its not a windom) are notorious for that problem. You'll need to install some good common mode chokes (high choking impedance). For an OFCD you'll need two or more on the coax feed line. I would start with one at the antenna feed point and another where the coax enters the shack. Danny, K6MHE |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 07:25:39 -0800, Danny Richardson
wrote: Based upon your description you can bet the farm you've got common mode problems. Amen |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2 mar, 16:06, "Teri Buck" wrote:
I am using a multi-switch to change radios and antennas. One of those MFJ 1700Bs. I get different SWR readings depending upon where I place the bridge in the tangle of wires that go into and out of the switch. If I take the switch out of the equation I get very low SWR. With it in I get 2.5:1. Hello Teri, It is very likely a common mode problem (as Danny and Richard also mentioned). Sometimes the SWR meter is the problem. Check your instrument by connecting a known mismatched with various length of cable (for example 75 Ohms resistor in combination with 2 1/8 wave 50 Ohms cables). This resistor should give a 1.5 reading on the instrument, irrespective of cable length between resistor and instrument (provided that cable losses can be neglected). Other problem (unlikely) can be significant harmonics in the output of your Final Amplifier. Best regards, Wim PA3DJS |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Teri Buck" wrote in news:44XFh.4$mI6.3@trndny08:
I am using a multi-switch to change radios and antennas. One of those MFJ 1700Bs. I get different SWR readings depending upon where I place the bridge in the tangle of wires that go into and out of the switch. Teri, some thoughts: For practical transmission lines and antennas, the VSWR decreases smoothly from load to source, and the rate of decrease depends on the transmission line (one way) loss and is predictable. For example if the VSWR is 1.5 at a certain point, then at another point closer to the source and where the one way cable loss is 1dB to the first point, the VSWR will be 1.4. So, if you are truly making VSWR readings without changing the line length, you should expect the readings to decrease towards the generator, but the decrease for practical lines will be quite small. If you observe otherwise (higher or lower) something else is happening. A well designed switch should not change the VSWR much on the through leg, so measurements either side of it should be similar. If you are changing line length as well as moving the VSWR meter (just to complicate issues), a likely contiribution is that the outside of the outer conductor is influencing the load seen at the load end of the coax, ie the cable is carrying current on its outer (which is often undesirable). If I take the switch out of the equation I get very low SWR. With it in I get 2.5:1. Is this on only one antenna, or are you generalising and oversimplifying things? In taking the switch out, have you disconnected the cable outer conductors whereas they would have all been bonded at the switch? What does the switch do with the non-selected antennas, does it ground them? Grounding the end of the feedline to the unused, but mutually coupled antenna may inflence the load presented by the selected antenna. Have you checked all the components in your "tangle of wires". Are there faulty cables, or loose connectors (especially if you are using UHF connectors). The answers to these questions might throw light on what is happening and whether choking will fix it. All of the coax has a common ground so the OCF windom also shares a Well, you know that the "OCF Windom" (aren't they all off centre fed) depends on a radiating feedline. Perhaps you mean one of the newer designs with coax vertical that are designed to have common mode current on the vertical part, then you try to restrict that current at a point where you decide the coax is to be feedline and not radiator, which is easier said than done. .... Owen |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|