Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good morning!
I would like to request some additional info regarding the following matter. Is there a way to approximate the antenna factor loss (in dB/m) for an x-length (in inches ... maybe 26 inches) regular telescoping, monopole antenna that will be subjected to frequencies between 88-108MHz (FM band) at a height between 2ft to 15ft from the ground? Here's the scenario. A 50-ohm receiver will be used. A cable with an insertion loss of 1.5dB will also be used. The receiver has sensitivity levels as low as -5 dBuV. The lowest received signal that we want to measure is 100uV/m. I am concerned that if an unmatched monopole antenna is used in this system, then it is possible that very low level signals will not be measured. I'm trying to estimate the lowest amount of signal the receiver will be able to pickup using this setup. I have the following relationship: dB(uV/m) = dBuV + Antenna Factor (dB/m) + cable loss (dB) So, I get: dBuV = 40 dB(uV/m) - Antenna Factor (dB/m) - 1.5 dB(cable loss) Now, if only I can estimate the antenna factor, then it would give me an idea whether or not the resulting dBuV level is still higher than -5 dBuV. I was told that there may be a way to estimate the antenna impedance assuming certain conditions. I was hoping to find some reference for this subject, and just assume how much of the signal is lost due to the antenna impedance and 50-ohm receiver impedance mismatch. I have seen some nomograph for VSWR, so I figured if I can find the estimated antenna impedance at the given conditions, then I can calculate reflection coefficient and relate that to VSWR and then to the nomograph to get my antenna factor value. What do you experienced ones think? Thanks! |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2 Mar 2007 07:40:48 -0800, "MRW" wrote:
I am concerned that if an unmatched monopole antenna is used in this system, then it is possible that very low level signals will not be measured. It is distinctly possible high level signals won't be measured either. What do you experienced ones think? Thanks! Skip the math and simply build a matched antenna. If you can do the whip part, do it again below it and choke the line leading to the two elements. (Google "vertical dipole." If your signal is horizontally polarized, substitute "horizontal dipole.") ***** end of problem ***** 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"MRW" wrote in news:1172850043.053869.294430@
30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com: Good morning! I would like to request some additional info regarding the following matter. Is there a way to approximate the antenna factor loss (in dB/m) for an The word loss does not belong in there. x-length (in inches ... maybe 26 inches) regular telescoping, monopole antenna that will be subjected to frequencies between 88-108MHz (FM band) at a height between 2ft to 15ft from the ground? Simple formulas to determine AF depend on the monopole being short (and yours isn't) and on a perfect ground plane (you haven't stated). Here's the scenario. A 50-ohm receiver will be used. A cable with an insertion loss of 1.5dB will also be used. The receiver has sensitivity levels as low as -5 dBuV. The lowest received signal that we want to measure is 100uV/m. You would be best served by converting your minimum Field Strength to received power for a nominal antenna system, then determining the minimum antenna system gain that will achieve your target S/N ratio (not stated in your data, sort of implied in your sensitivity spec, but check / adjust it). With a antenna *system* gain of 0dBi, at 108MHz with FS 100uV/m (40dBuV/m), the 50 ohm receiver voltage is 29.1 dBuV. The receiver voltage will 30.9 dBuV for the same situation at 88MHz. From the above, the Antenna Factor for a 0dBi gain at 108MHz is 40-29.1= 10.9dB/m, and yes, it is frequency dependent. Antennas aren't often specified by Antenna Factor, gain is more common. Antenna system means all components upstream of the receiver. Owen |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"MRW" wrote in news:1172850043.053869.294430@
30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com: Good morning! I would like to request some additional info regarding the following matter. Is there a way to approximate the antenna factor loss (in dB/m) for an x-length (in inches ... maybe 26 inches) regular telescoping, monopole antenna that will be subjected to frequencies between 88-108MHz (FM band) at a height between 2ft to 15ft from the ground? .... I was told that there may be a way to estimate the antenna impedance assuming certain conditions. I was hoping to find some reference for this subject, and just assume how much of the signal is lost due to the antenna impedance and 50-ohm receiver impedance mismatch. I have seen some nomograph for VSWR, so I figured if I can find the estimated antenna impedance at the given conditions, then I can calculate reflection coefficient and relate that to VSWR and then to the nomograph to get my antenna factor value. .... Here is an example of the workup of Antenna Factor for a small square untuned loop for field strength measurement: http://www.vk1od.net/SmallUntunedSquareLoop/index.htm . Is this really what you wanted to do, but for a short monopole (which of course needs a different approach)? Owen |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 2, 10:40 am, "MRW" wrote:
Good morning! I would like to request some additional info regarding the following matter. Is there a way to approximate the antenna factor loss (in dB/m) for an x-length (in inches ... maybe 26 inches) regular telescoping, monopole antenna that will be subjected to frequencies between 88-108MHz (FM band) at a height between 2ft to 15ft from the ground? Here's the scenario. A 50-ohm receiver will be used. A cable with an insertion loss of 1.5dB will also be used. The receiver has sensitivity levels as low as -5 dBuV. The lowest received signal that we want to measure is 100uV/m. I am concerned that if an unmatched monopole antenna is used in this system, then it is possible that very low level signals will not be measured. I'm trying to estimate the lowest amount of signal the receiver will be able to pickup using this setup. I have the following relationship: dB(uV/m) = dBuV + Antenna Factor (dB/m) + cable loss (dB) So, I get: dBuV = 40 dB(uV/m) - Antenna Factor (dB/m) - 1.5 dB(cable loss) Now, if only I can estimate the antenna factor, then it would give me an idea whether or not the resulting dBuV level is still higher than -5 dBuV. I was told that there may be a way to estimate the antenna impedance assuming certain conditions. I was hoping to find some reference for this subject, and just assume how much of the signal is lost due to the antenna impedance and 50-ohm receiver impedance mismatch. I have seen some nomograph for VSWR, so I figured if I can find the estimated antenna impedance at the given conditions, then I can calculate reflection coefficient and relate that to VSWR and then to the nomograph to get my antenna factor value. What do you experienced ones think? Thanks! I believe you are going to be more concerned with the transmission line loss and the additional loss incurred due to the mismatch if the mismatch is severe. To obtain a desktop estimate of the VSWR, download W7EL's EZNEC demo version (www.eznec.com) and put in the antenna dimensions, frequency of interest etc. It will calculate the impedance and VSWR for you. Take those values and go to http://www.vk1od.net/tl/tllc.php and plug in your values along with the cable you plan on using. You can also pull the ARRL Antenna book and look for the formula to calculate the additional transmission line loss due to a load mismatch. Harry |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"harry" wrote in
ups.com: .... I believe you are going to be more concerned with the transmission line loss and the additional loss incurred due to the mismatch if the mismatch is severe. Harry, At the risk of reawakening the source end re-reflection noise, this is a receiving application, if the receiver is 50 ohms (as the OP stated) and 50 ohm coax is used to connect to a short monopole over ideal ground, the VSWR on the line is 1:1 (or near enough), and loss is the matched line loss. The implications of that are that the short monopole, which has a source impedance of very small radiation resistance and loss resistance, and a huge capacitive reactance is loaded by the 50 ohm impedance looking into the coax. You can relatively easily work out the o/c voltage in the whip as a result of an incident E field (it will be ~E*length/2), but you must estimate the capacitive reactance as it is the main determinant of the voltage divider formed by the antenna source impedance and the 50 ohm load. To obtain a desktop estimate of the VSWR, download W7EL's EZNEC demo version (www.eznec.com) and put in the antenna dimensions, frequency of interest etc. It will calculate the impedance and VSWR for you. The impedance from NEC (of any flavour) can be used to workout the voltage divider I mentioned above. Alternatively, use a variety of NEC where you can excite the antenna with an incident wave and observe the voltage developed on a load inserted in the model. The model described http://www.vk1od.net/SmallUntunedSquareLoop/ssulNEC.htm at does such a thing for a loop, you could do something similar for a short monopole. My thinking is that a short monopole is less attractive at these frequencies than using a dipole of known gain and impedance, a dipole is convenient (probably more than a short monopole with a large ground plane) and more sensitive (ie lower Antenna Factor). Take those values and go to http://www.vk1od.net/tl/tllc.php and plug in your values along with the cable you plan on using. You can also pull the ARRL Antenna book and look for the formula to calculate the additional transmission line loss due to a load mismatch. The formula in this case for the monopole termination loss is 20*log(50/ (Zs+50)) and must be factored into the ratio of E field to o/c voltage to get AF. Owen |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you for the responses everyone! I will look at the links posted
above. Owen, great site! I have added it to my bookmarks. Thank you, sir! |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"MRW" wrote in news:1172850043.053869.294430@
30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com: Good morning! I would like to request some additional info regarding the following matter. Is there a way to approximate the antenna factor loss (in dB/m) for an x-length (in inches ... maybe 26 inches) regular telescoping, monopole antenna that will be subjected to frequencies between 88-108MHz (FM band) at a height between 2ft to 15ft from the ground? Here's the scenario. A 50-ohm receiver will be used. A cable with an insertion loss of 1.5dB will also be used. The receiver has sensitivity levels as low as -5 dBuV. The lowest received signal that we want to measure is 100uV/m. I am concerned that if an unmatched monopole antenna is used in this system, then it is possible that very low level signals will not be measured. I'm trying to estimate the lowest amount of signal the receiver will be able to pickup using this setup. I have the following relationship: dB(uV/m) = dBuV + Antenna Factor (dB/m) + cable loss (dB) So, I get: dBuV = 40 dB(uV/m) - Antenna Factor (dB/m) - 1.5 dB(cable loss) MRW, I had forgotton writing a little calculator that will find the receive power given field strength given field strength, freq, antenna gain etc, it is at http://vk1od.net/sc/FS2RPCalc.htm . For your purposes, make the "Field Strengh" and "Receiver" bandwidths and distance to source the same as each other, the actual values don't matter (well, so long as they are greater than zero). Owen Now, if only I can estimate the antenna factor, then it would give me an idea whether or not the resulting dBuV level is still higher than -5 dBuV. I was told that there may be a way to estimate the antenna impedance assuming certain conditions. I was hoping to find some reference for this subject, and just assume how much of the signal is lost due to the antenna impedance and 50-ohm receiver impedance mismatch. I have seen some nomograph for VSWR, so I figured if I can find the estimated antenna impedance at the given conditions, then I can calculate reflection coefficient and relate that to VSWR and then to the nomograph to get my antenna factor value. What do you experienced ones think? Thanks! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Part # 2 - The Simplest Shortwave Listener (SWL) Antennas That I Know Of . . . | Shortwave | |||
I Want Another Antenna | Shortwave | |||
No CounterPoise - Portable Antenna System | Shortwave | |||
Question is 'it' a Longwire {Random Wire} Antenna -or- Inverted "L" Antenna ? | Shortwave | |||
LongWire Antenna | Shortwave |