Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
How does a vertical monopole antenna with elevated quarterwave radials work
when receiving? The radials are in free space. Do the radials reflect or emit a wave that cancels out? Is it possible to model this antenna in receive mode with a NEC program? I am trying to work out whether the electromagnetic principles that apply in transmit mode also apply in receive mode. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David wrote:
How does a vertical monopole antenna with elevated quarterwave radials work when receiving? Exactly as it does when transmitting, in reverse. The radials are in free space. No, not really. If high enough, they behave like they are, but they're not that high in typical HF applications. Do the radials reflect or emit a wave that cancels out? No. The radials radiate very little. They certainly interact with the vertical portion of the antenna, but not in a way that could be described as "reflection" in any sense. Is it possible to model this antenna in receive mode with a NEC program? Yes. Look up the explanation and examples of plane wave excitation in the NEC manual. If done correctly, you should get identical but reciprocal results as when modeled as a transmitting antenna. (EZNEC doesn't implement plane wave excitation, but you can create an essentially plane wave by adding a small "transmitting" antenna with source a few wavelengths away.) I am trying to work out whether the electromagnetic principles that apply in transmit mode also apply in receive mode. Others have wondered the same thing, but somewhere around a hundred years ago the problem was solved. They do. A google search on antenna reciprocity should get you started in the learning process. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5 Mar, 14:39, Roy Lewallen wrote:
David wrote: How does a vertical monopole antenna with elevated quarterwave radials work when receiving? Exactly as it does when transmitting, in reverse. The radials are in free space. No, not really. If high enough, they behave like they are, but they're not that high in typical HF applications. Do the radials reflect or emit a wave that cancels out? No. The radials radiate very little. They certainly interact with the vertical portion of the antenna, but not in a way that could be described as "reflection" in any sense. Is it possible to model this antenna in receive mode with a NEC program? Yes. Look up the explanation and examples of plane wave excitation in the NEC manual. If done correctly, you should get identical but reciprocal results as when modeled as a transmitting antenna. (EZNEC doesn't implement plane wave excitation, but you can create an essentially plane wave by adding a small "transmitting" antenna with source a few wavelengths away.) I am trying to work out whether the electromagnetic principles that apply in transmit mode also apply in receive mode. Others have wondered the same thing, but somewhere around a hundred years ago the problem was solved. They do. A google search on antenna reciprocity should get you started in the learning process. Roy Lewallen, W7EL David, The word reprocity is often badly used when comparing transmit and receive. One cannot avoid the question of the envirovental or medium conditions relative to the mode and direction of the radiation travel. Another thing you might want to pursue is how a receiving antenna separates radiation into different vectors. It is generaly stated that actions are reciprocal but I believe that is an emperical response of which I personaly have no scientific knoweledge that backs up that assertion. Maybe some where it is all written down somewhere and everything is really known about antennas Art |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
But if the field of the radials cancels out, is there any benefit in having
radials in receive mode? |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David wrote:
But if the field of the radials cancels out, is there any benefit in having radials in receive mode? Yes. If you eliminate the radials, you have a single conductor wire (the "antenna") connected to a feedline or receiver. The feedline or receiver has two terminals which comprise an electrical circuit. If you leave one of those conductors open circuited, current induced by the passing signal will not flow from the "antenna" to the receiver or feedline. In practice, it's nearly impossible to really open circuit the other conductor (that is, the one not connected to the "antenna") -- the outside of the feedline, if coax, will become the other half of the antenna, as will anything conductive connected to the receiver chassis. This is often undesirable because those conductors are more likely to receive noise from local sources than if the entire antenna is in the clear. It will also distort the antenna pattern, possibly in a major way. I've put "antenna" in quotes because the vertical wire is only half the antenna. The other half is either radials or, if radials are missing, the other conductors I mentioned. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Need some help designing a receiving antenna | Antenna | |||
How Many : Inverted "L" Antenna Radials for a Receiving Only Antenna ? | Shortwave | |||
Gap antennas, elevated radials | Antenna | |||
Any experiences with inverted L and elevated radials | Antenna |