Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all,
When co-phasing two identical two meter yagis, is it necessary to use the "power dividers" sold by the antenna manufacter? If two odd multiples of 1/4 wavelength 75 Ohm coax is carefully constructed and run into a T connector, won't this achieve the same thing? Is there a real peformance difference? Thanks, Scott, WU2X |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
All you need for this special case are two pieces of coax which are the
same length and a tee connector. Yes, there might be a performance difference -- "power dividers" are likely to add unnecessary loss to the system, reducing your signal strength. "Power dividers" aren't the right solution for any antenna phasing problem. See Chapter 8 of the _ARRL Antenna Book_ for more information. And feeding two elements or phased antennas with just two pieces of coax is usually more complicated than cutting them to the difference in phase angle, as explained in the _Antenna Book_ and http://eznec.com/Amateur/Articles/Simpfeed.pdf. But yours is a special case that's easy to do. Roy Lewallen, W7EL wrote: Hi all, When co-phasing two identical two meter yagis, is it necessary to use the "power dividers" sold by the antenna manufacter? If two odd multiples of 1/4 wavelength 75 Ohm coax is carefully constructed and run into a T connector, won't this achieve the same thing? Is there a real peformance difference? Thanks, Scott, WU2X |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ups.com... Hi all, When co-phasing two identical two meter yagis, is it necessary to use the "power dividers" sold by the antenna manufacter? If two odd multiples of 1/4 wavelength 75 Ohm coax is carefully constructed and run into a T connector, won't this achieve the same thing? Is there a real peformance difference? Thanks, Scott, WU2X Hi Scott That pair of 75 ohm transformers will work. I'd suggest that you consider only 1/4 wavelength for the 70 ohm transformer in each line from the 50 ohm Yagis. Additional transformer length will effect impedance bandwidth. I'd suggest using the "power dividers" unless $$cost is a consideration. Jerry |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If the antennas are to be spaced more than a 1/2 wavelength (free
space), how can I use a 1/4 wavelength of 75 Ohm coax? I guess I would have to splice in a 1/2 wavelength multiple of 50 Ohm coax between the 75 ohm coax and the T connection to make up the length. I only need about 500Khz of bandwidth, so this might not be a concern. But this was another question I was going to raise. Is there anyway to calculate the bandwidth that I would see from a 1/4 wavelength matching section? I guess that is a real easy one to test in real life though. Thanks for all the responses! -Scott, WU2X On Mar 8, 1:28 pm, "Jerry Martes" wrote: I'd suggest that you consider only 1/4 wavelength for the 70 ohm transformer in each line from the 50 ohm Yagis. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ups.com... If the antennas are to be spaced more than a 1/2 wavelength (free space), how can I use a 1/4 wavelength of 75 Ohm coax? I guess I would have to splice in a 1/2 wavelength multiple of 50 Ohm coax between the 75 ohm coax and the T connection to make up the length. I only need about 500Khz of bandwidth, so this might not be a concern. But this was another question I was going to raise. Is there anyway to calculate the bandwidth that I would see from a 1/4 wavelength matching section? I guess that is a real easy one to test in real life though. Thanks for all the responses! -Scott, WU2X Hi Scott If it is OK to assume the antenna's input impedance is close to 50 ohms. Any length of 50 ohm line can be installed to a location where the 1/4 wave transformers can be installed. It may be confusion for me to add that I have connected two 50 ohm coaxes in series to make them look like 100 ohms at the junction. I didnt think the joining of coax center conductor to the outer conductor of another was a good idea till I did it (after being advised by Mr Richard Clark). Series-ing coax works quite well at 2 meters when a couple ferrite sleeves are used to minimize currents on the outside of the shield. That allows only one 75 ohm matching transformer (which isnt much of an advantage in your case). Jerry |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh yes, what was I thinking. From the antenna feedpoint, I can run two
equal length pieces of 50 ohm coax to the 1/4 wavelength matching sections into the T connector - as you just said. But it will be much more convenient for me to just use an entire run of 75 Ohm coax, but as I said before, now you have me curious about the effect on bandwidth - I will have a total of 1.75 wavelengths of 75 Ohm coax per leg. -Scott, WU2X On Mar 8, 2:31 pm, "Jerry Martes" wrote: If it is OK to assume the antenna's input impedance is close to 50 ohms. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ps.com... Oh yes, what was I thinking. From the antenna feedpoint, I can run two equal length pieces of 50 ohm coax to the 1/4 wavelength matching sections into the T connector - as you just said. But it will be much more convenient for me to just use an entire run of 75 Ohm coax, but as I said before, now you have me curious about the effect on bandwidth - I will have a total of 1.75 wavelengths of 75 Ohm coax per leg. -Scott, WU2X Hi Scott How much do you like Smith Charts?? It would be very easy to plot, for three frequencies, the impedance at the "far end" of the 75 ohm lines. That seems like a 5 minute job. Then you will know the amount of error introduced at the edges of your bandwidth. You'd know the impedance at the upper, mid and lower frequencies. It may be that a couple wavelengths of 75 ohm line may not introduce enough error to be concerned with. Jerry |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott wrote:
If the antennas are to be spaced more than a 1/2 wavelength (free space), how can I use a 1/4 wavelength of 75 Ohm coax? I guess I would have to splice in a 1/2 wavelength multiple of 50 Ohm coax between the 75 ohm coax and the T connection to make up the length. Use any lengths of 50-ohm coax, and then connect them using the "combiner" or "power divider" of your choice. In practice the divider/combiner will be simply a quarter-wave impedance transformer associated with a T-piece. The 75-ohm coax version will transform each leg from 50 to 100 ohms (ideally you'd need 70.7-ohm coax for that) and then the T-piece connects those in parallel to give 50 ohms. Alternatively, you can use the type of divider/combiner that directly parallels the two 50-ohm lines, and then transforms the resulting 25-ohm impedance back up to 50 ohms through a quarter-wave of home made 35-ohm hardline. There's not a lot of practical difference between the two methods, except that the first one requires you to cut and terminate two sets of equal lengths of coax. The second one is easier electrically, but requires some basic metalworking skills. I only need about 500Khz of bandwidth, so this might not be a concern. But this was another question I was going to raise. Is there anyway to calculate the bandwidth that I would see from a 1/4 wavelength matching section? I guess that is a real easy one to test in real life though. If you need only 500kHz bandwidth at 144MHz, that will not be a concern. -- 73 from Ian GM3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
Oh yes, what was I thinking. From the antenna feedpoint, I can run two equal length pieces of 50 ohm coax to the 1/4 wavelength matching sections into the T connector - as you just said. But it will be much more convenient for me to just use an entire run of 75 Ohm coax, but as I said before, now you have me curious about the effect on bandwidth - I will have a total of 1.75 wavelengths of 75 Ohm coax per leg. I just saw the above, after having posted my first reply. That wouldn't be a smart idea. Compared with either of the solutions that uses only a single quarter-wavelength for the impedance transformation, running two mismatched legs to 1.75 wavelengths will increase the rate of change of phase with frequency by a factor of 1.75/0.25 = 7. In that case, bandwidth might indeed become a problem, and phase matching a big problem. -- 73 from Ian GM3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
safety/working harness | Antenna | |||
PHASING HARNESS FOR 2 BAY CIRCULAR POLARIZED ANTENNA????? | Antenna | |||
phasing harness question | Antenna | |||
harness | Antenna | |||
FA: 2m ssb loops with stacking harness | Swap |