Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello all,
I'm trying to make a carfinder, where a pocket-sized, keyring-attached transmitter sends a signal to a car, the car sends a reply, and the carfinder shows some kind of signal strength indication. Do this as the operator turns in a circle, and he should have an idea of where he left his car in the carpark. In Australia, it is legal to use 150MHz for any purpose, so long as the output is limited to 100mW. I've found a pre-made transmitter unit for that frequency and power (which gets 10km with a good antenna), but I'm a novice to radio in general and am looking for pointers to information on choosing the right kind of antenna to that is small enough to fit. In the car, I don't have much more space (I could use the car's antenna instead), but it would need to be omnidirectional. Thankyou for your time. -- |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 02:35:51 GMT, "David Hooker"
wrote: Hi David, Presumably, you are speaking of a pocket-sized, keyring-attached receiving antenna too, such that it can resolve the point of transmission to a fairly narrow region. It would take an especially large pocket to accomplish (not even a 'roo's). Such a design demands complexity in the form of volume at the scale of 2 meters. You are off by a scale of 100 or so. Perhaps if your frequency was set to 15GHz.... 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 02:35:51 GMT, "David Hooker" wrote: Hi David, Presumably, you are speaking of a pocket-sized, keyring-attached receiving antenna too, such that it can resolve the point of transmission to a fairly narrow region. Yes, I forgot to mention that. I always forget something when Usenet posting. Sorry. It would take an especially large pocket to accomplish (not even a 'roo's). Such a design demands complexity in the form of volume at the scale of 2 meters. You are off by a scale of 100 or so. Perhaps if your frequency was set to 15GHz.... 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Ahhh. OK, if I can legally call this a "radiodetermination transmitter" then I can use up to 25W (!) at 7.6-7.7GHz; otherwise the highest frequency I can use is 2.4-2.425GHz at 100mW. But if I'm in a carpark and I'm using such a high frequency (please excuse me, I'm a novice) but wouldn't I have trouble with reflections from the metal of the cars and concrete around me? -- |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 04:27:01 GMT, "David Hooker"
wrote: Ahhh. OK, if I can legally call this a "radiodetermination transmitter" then I can use up to 25W (!) at 7.6-7.7GHz; otherwise the highest frequency I can use is 2.4-2.425GHz at 100mW. But if I'm in a carpark and I'm using such a high frequency (please excuse me, I'm a novice) but wouldn't I have trouble with reflections from the metal of the cars and concrete around me? Hi David, 100 mW in the 2M region is enough power to communicate with the space shuttle. You are not lacking for power, you are lacking for scale. Your inspiration of 7+ Ghz comes close enough to be achievable (and using Gunn Diodes as transmission sources). However, scale will still make the product about as long as a pencil, or the entire structure the size of a business card. Not quite the key fob, but closer. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I'm a novice to radio in general and am looking for pointers to information on choosing the right kind of antenna to that is small enough to fit. In the car, I don't have much more space (I could use the car's antenna instead), but it would need to be omnidirectional. Getting any kind of directivity at 150MHz with small aerials is very difficult. The wavelength at 150MHz in 2m so you can see that element lengths will be quite long. One possibility might be a ferrite rod type antenna if you can find some vhf ferrite. Some older pagers used them so that may be a source. However you may still struggle to get very good directivity. Perhaps an active solution may be a better bet. Try Googling for Handifinder, which is basically 2 small antennas that are switched at a fast rate, this produces a tone in the receiver which vanishes when both antennas have equal path length to the source. Regards Jeff |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Jeff
writes I'm a novice to radio in general and am looking for pointers to information on choosing the right kind of antenna to that is small enough to fit. In the car, I don't have much more space (I could use the car's antenna instead), but it would need to be omnidirectional. Getting any kind of directivity at 150MHz with small aerials is very difficult. The wavelength at 150MHz in 2m so you can see that element lengths will be quite long. One possibility might be a ferrite rod type antenna if you can find some vhf ferrite. Some older pagers used them so that may be a source. However you may still struggle to get very good directivity. Perhaps an active solution may be a better bet. Try Googling for Handifinder, which is basically 2 small antennas that are switched at a fast rate, this produces a tone in the receiver which vanishes when both antennas have equal path length to the source. Regards Jeff I found that, when using a 2m handheld (Trio 2200, therefore both hands!), using your body as a shield can be used to give a useful indication of where the signal is coming from. Ian. -- |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 04:27:01 GMT, "David Hooker" wrote: Ahhh. OK, if I can legally call this a "radiodetermination transmitter" then I can use up to 25W (!) at 7.6-7.7GHz; otherwise the highest frequency I can use is 2.4-2.425GHz at 100mW. But if I'm in a carpark and I'm using such a high frequency (please excuse me, I'm a novice) but wouldn't I have trouble with reflections from the metal of the cars and concrete around me? Hi David, 100 mW in the 2M region is enough power to communicate with the space shuttle. You are not lacking for power, you are lacking for scale. Your inspiration of 7+ Ghz comes close enough to be achievable (and using Gunn Diodes as transmission sources). However, scale will still make the product about as long as a pencil, or the entire structure the size of a business card. Not quite the key fob, but closer. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC You could always use a fractal antenna! :-) Irv VE6BP |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 02:35:51 GMT, David Hooker wrote:
Hello all, I'm trying to make a carfinder, where a pocket-sized, keyring-attached transmitter sends a signal to a car, the car sends a reply, and the carfinder shows some kind of signal strength indication. Do this as the operator turns in a circle, and he should have an idea of where he left his car in the carpark. You realise, don't you, that in a large parking lot filled with cars (that's why you can't see yours - isn't it) you will be surounded by a multitude of large RF reflectors? Use your ears. Honk the horn. Your ears will be more directional than any RF-with-tiny-directional-antenna-at-150mcs solution could be. Or, get an amateur radio license and mount a large, honkin' 80M mobile whip on it. Use your eyes -- the *most* directional. Jonesy -- Marvin L Jones | jonz | W3DHJ | linux 38.24N 104.55W | @ config.com | Jonesy | OS/2 *** Killfiling google posts: http://jonz.net/ng.htm |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thankyou all for your replies
|
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote in
: On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 02:35:51 GMT, "David Hooker" wrote: Hi David, Presumably, you are speaking of a pocket-sized, keyring-attached receiving antenna too, such that it can resolve the point of transmission to a fairly narrow region. It would take an especially large pocket to accomplish (not even a 'roo's). Such a design demands complexity in the form of volume at the scale of 2 meters. You are off by a scale of 100 or so. Perhaps if your frequency was set to 15GHz.... Why not, due to the close range, think inverse square law instead of directivity? Could still be a bit confusing in an underground carpark, but basically, the source and the receiver are close enough that a few steps ought to make a readable difference in strength. Just walk in a circle and keep widening it on the side where the signal is strongest and narrowing where it is weakest. The closer you get, the less sensitivity you need, so have some method of turning that down. And 100mw is LOTS of power for this! -- Dave Oldridge+ ICQ 1800667 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Directional antenna - recomendation | Dx | |||
Directional antenna - recomendation | Dx | |||
Antenna directional | Swap | |||
Directional antenna | Antenna | |||
Directional antenna wanted. | Antenna |