Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've recently read comments that several Hams have been using the RG-6
coaxial cable instead of the standard RG-8 or other commonly accepted cables such as RG-58. One said that he buys this RG-6 at one of the home warehouse stores and buys it in 500 foot spools. He said it is far less expensive than the commonly accepted cables we purchase from various Ham outlets. Yes, it is 75 Ohm cable, but the users of same claim that it works quite well and can withstand higher voltages than advertised and more than one user claimed that they could run 1,500 watts through the cable with no apparent deterioration. If this is so, then I missed this open *secret*. Any input would be welcome...especially the experiences of you who use it. I just happen to have a spool of this cable in my garage that I purchased at an estate auction some years ago and if it works as said, then I will cancel my order with The Wireman. Thanks in advance for your comments. Name and Call withheld to avoid spammers and Usenet flooders. 73 |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Nod Dloyd" anon@anon wrote in message ... I've recently read comments that several Hams have been using the RG-6 coaxial cable instead of the standard RG-8 or other commonly accepted cables such as RG-58. One said that he buys this RG-6 at one of the home warehouse stores and buys it in 500 foot spools. He said it is far less expensive than the commonly accepted cables we purchase from various Ham outlets. Yes, it is 75 Ohm cable, but the users of same claim that it works quite well and can withstand higher voltages than advertised and more than one user claimed that they could run 1,500 watts through the cable with no apparent deterioration. The 75 ohm part should not (in general) be a problem. You could always use a tuner if there is an issue. However, here are the things you should check. 1. Loss per hundred feet (see the ARRL antenna book) for the frequencies you are going to use. A long run at VHF/UHF might be an issue. 2. Check its rated power versus the power you plan to run. If it's TV cable (which it probably is), I doubt that it is rated very high. I've never checked so can't really say. However, just because some people get away with running 1500 watts through it doesn't mean you should. The deterioration may not be immediately evident. It may simply shorten its life and you'ld be replacing it more often. 3. Check to see it's UV rating. Outdoor environments are hard enough on coax. Some are designed for indoor use and others for outdoor use. If this is the indoor kind, it will deteriorate much faster if used outdoors and you will be replacing it more often. The antenna system (and this includes the coax) is perhaps the most important part of your setup. It's best to do it right so check on the items I mention. Don't be like the classic case of the fisherman who buys a $500 rod but puts on a $5 reel and nickel fishing line and then is always cussing that the line snarls and the reel jams. In other words don't be penny wise and pound foolish. Make sure that the coax is suitable for the application. If this is so, then I missed this open *secret*. Any input would be welcome...especially the experiences of you who use it. I just happen to have a spool of this cable in my garage that I purchased at an estate auction some years ago and if it works as said, then I will cancel my order with The Wireman. I haven't bought coax in a long time (probably due to replace the old by now) but I believe his is rated for outdoor environments and UV exposure. Dee, N8UZE |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Nod Dloyd" anon@anon wrote in message ... I've recently read comments that several Hams have been using the RG-6 coaxial cable instead of the standard RG-8 or other commonly accepted cables such as RG-58. One said that he buys this RG-6 at one of the home warehouse stores and buys it in 500 foot spools. He said it is far less expensive than the commonly accepted cables we purchase from various Ham outlets. Yes, it is 75 Ohm cable, but the users of same claim that it works quite well and can withstand higher voltages than advertised and more than one user claimed that they could run 1,500 watts through the cable with no apparent deterioration. If this is so, then I missed this open *secret*. Any input would be welcome...especially the experiences of you who use it. I just happen to have a spool of this cable in my garage that I purchased at an estate auction some years ago and if it works as said, then I will cancel my order with The Wireman. The 75 ohm cable is fine for usage. There are several minor problems to watch out for. The major one is most of it is aluminum shielding and can not be soldered to. The center conductor is often copper coated steel which is another mechanical problem. I am not sure about the power rating for the rg-6 but should be fine for the 100 watt rigs. The swr meters may not act correctly with the 77 ohm cable, but you can still adjust for minimum swr. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ralph Mowery wrote:
The 75 ohm cable is fine for usage. There are several minor problems to watch out for. The major one is most of it is aluminum shielding and can not be soldered to. There was a guy at the Fort Tuthill hamfest who was soldering aluminum. Has anyone ever tried his technique on aluminum coax? I still have some of that aluminum solder. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Ralph Mowery wrote: The 75 ohm cable is fine for usage. There are several minor problems to watch out for. The major one is most of it is aluminum shielding and can not be soldered to. There was a guy at the Fort Tuthill hamfest who was soldering aluminum. Has anyone ever tried his technique on aluminum coax? I still have some of that aluminum solder. Cecil: Has been my lot that the "solder" is the least important part (got 60/40 to work) ... Aluminum has the nasty habit of oxidizing almost immediately on cleaning/brightening. I have had some luck by using a silicone oil/lub on the braid and scrubbing/sanding the braid clean and then soldering. Your milage may vary ... Regards, JS |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Nod Dloyd" anon@anon wrote in message ... I've recently read comments that several Hams have been using the RG-6 coaxial cable instead of the standard RG-8 or other commonly accepted cables such as RG-58. One said that he buys this RG-6 at one of the home warehouse stores and buys it in 500 foot spools. He said it is far less expensive than the commonly accepted cables we purchase from various Ham outlets. Yes, it is 75 Ohm cable, but the users of same claim that it works quite well and can withstand higher voltages than advertised and more than one user claimed that they could run 1,500 watts through the cable with no apparent deterioration. If this is so, then I missed this open *secret*. Any input would be welcome...especially the experiences of you who use it. I just happen to have a spool of this cable in my garage that I purchased at an estate auction some years ago and if it works as said, then I will cancel my order with The Wireman. Thanks in advance for your comments. Name and Call withheld to avoid spammers and Usenet flooders. 73 I would not run it up the tower, or anywhere else that is hard to get at. Without spending an arm and a leg, use crimp on connectors. I have some PL259 type crimp ons (Digikey), and they work fine, even at a KW+. I did solder the center conductor on the LMR240 (same diameter as RG6). The center conductor might be way too small for the hole in the connector; in that case stuff some pieces of wire in next to the center conductor so you are not connected through solder only. Tam/WB2TT |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() " anon@anon wrote in message ... "Tam/WB2TT" wrote in message . .. "Nod Dloyd" anon@anon wrote in message ... I've recently read comments that several Hams have been using the RG-6 coaxial cable instead of the standard RG-8 or other commonly accepted cables such as RG-58. One said that he buys this RG-6 at one of the home warehouse stores and buys it in 500 foot spools. He said it is far less expensive than the commonly accepted cables we purchase from various Ham outlets. Yes, it is 75 Ohm cable, but the users of same claim that it works quite well and can withstand higher voltages than advertised and more than one user claimed that they could run 1,500 watts through the cable with no apparent deterioration. If this is so, then I missed this open *secret*. Any input would be welcome...especially the experiences of you who use it. I just happen to have a spool of this cable in my garage that I purchased at an estate auction some years ago and if it works as said, then I will cancel my order with The Wireman. Thanks in advance for your comments. Name and Call withheld to avoid spammers and Usenet flooders. 73 I would not run it up the tower, or anywhere else that is hard to get at. Without spending an arm and a leg, use crimp on connectors. I have some PL259 type crimp ons (Digikey), and they work fine, even at a KW+. I did solder the center conductor on the LMR240 (same diameter as RG6). The center conductor might be way too small for the hole in the connector; in that case stuff some pieces of wire in next to the center conductor so you are not connected through solder only. Tam/WB2TT I might point out to Dee that the RG-6 I see is indeed meant for outdoor use. Our local dish installers us it as their standard feedline. Of the few samples that I looked at, the black RG6 was outdoor rated, the white jacketed was not. Kind of makes sense. Didn't see any power ratings at the Belden site, but I seem to recall seeing ratings in the few hundred W range. Tam/WB2TT |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tam/WB2TT wrote:
I might point out to Dee that the RG-6 I see is indeed meant for outdoor use. Our local dish installers us it as their standard feedline. Of the few samples that I looked at, the black RG6 was outdoor rated, the white jacketed was not. Kind of makes sense. Didn't see any power ratings at the Belden site, but I seem to recall seeing ratings in the few hundred W range. RG-6 will take the legal limit on at least 80 and 160m and probably on 40m. It is available in direct burial type. The new, weather-proof crimp on connectors are wonderful. Several companies make or sell the PL-251 to F connector adaptors. W8JI had some informative technical posts on the subject on the topband reflector a few months back. Dave K8MN |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Heil" wrote in message rthlink.net... Tam/WB2TT wrote: I might point out to Dee that the RG-6 I see is indeed meant for outdoor use. Our local dish installers us it as their standard feedline. Of the few samples that I looked at, the black RG6 was outdoor rated, the white jacketed was not. Kind of makes sense. Didn't see any power ratings at the Belden site, but I seem to recall seeing ratings in the few hundred W range. RG-6 will take the legal limit on at least 80 and 160m and probably on 40m. It is available in direct burial type. The new, weather-proof crimp on connectors are wonderful. Several companies make or sell the PL-251 to F connector adaptors. W8JI had some informative technical posts on the subject on the topband reflector a few months back. Dave K8MN I would think the power level would be more voltage limiated. Most of the rg6 is rated around 300 to 350 volts. This is about 1200 watts on a matched line. derate for a swr of say 3 or 4 to 1 and you get to run about 300 to 400 watts into it, |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 8, 1:05 am, "Ralph Mowery" wrote:
"Dave Heil" wrote in message rthlink.net... Tam/WB2TT wrote: I might point out to Dee that the RG-6 I see is indeed meant for outdoor use. Our local dish installers us it as their standard feedline. Of the few samples that I looked at, the black RG6 was outdoor rated, the white jacketed was not. Kind of makes sense. Didn't see any power ratings at the Belden site, but I seem to recall seeing ratings in the few hundred W range. RG-6 will take the legal limit on at least 80 and 160m and probably on 40m. It is available in direct burial type. The new, weather-proof crimp on connectors are wonderful. Several companies make or sell the PL-251 to F connector adaptors. W8JI had some informative technical posts on the subject on the topband reflector a few months back. Dave K8MN I would think the power level would be more voltage limiated. Most of the rg6 is rated around 300 to 350 volts. This is about 1200 watts on a matched line. derate for a swr of say 3 or 4 to 1 and you get to run about 300 to 400 watts into it, personally I dont consider it for ham work it appears too far out of spec and cannot be gaurentead to be outdoor rated ie if ordered and the supplier does not have they may send the wrong type. In a warehouse you pay peanuts get monkeys. power wise take the 300 watts and 1/2 it for safety limits. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: RG-223/U COAXIAL CABLE | Swap | |||
FS: Coaxial Cable & Connectors | Boatanchors | |||
FS: Coaxial Cable | Swap | |||
FS: Mil Spec RG 223/U Coaxial Cable | Homebrew | |||
Coaxial Cable Question | Scanner |