Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil, W5DXP wrote:
"Beverage antennas are highly directional." Living in Portugal in the 1950`s, I used a Beverage antenna to listen to the CBS Evening News from WCBS in New York, and WWL in New Orleans. Whenever one station faded, I just rocked the dial and the other station would be there. Portugal is on Greenwich time so the Evening News was around midnight local time. By then, most of the Europeans had signed off. All you must have for a Beverage antenna is a long wire, say 2 wavelengths long, aimed at the targeted broadcaster. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 10 May 2007 14:54:03 GMT, "no spam" wrote:
Simple for you. My electronic education is limited to some high school and college physics and some 'playing' on my on. IOW, I know a cap isn't something you wear on your head but 'maximum mesh' sounds like either the gears in your transmission are working very well or your girl friend is wearing something sexy. Sorry about your limitations. Sounds like you will have some difficulty. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Beverage antennas are highly directional." Living in Portugal in the 1950`s, I used a Beverage antenna to listen to the CBS Evening News from WCBS in New York, and WWL in New Orleans. Whenever one station faded, I just rocked the dial and the other station would be there. Portugal is on Greenwich time so the Evening News was around midnight local time. By then, most of the Europeans had signed off. All you must have for a Beverage antenna is a long wire, say 2 wavelengths long, aimed at the targeted broadcaster. For 690 KHz that would be 2,850 feet of wire, just over 1/2 a mile of wire. |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"no spam" ) writes:
"Beverage antennas are highly directional." Living in Portugal in the 1950`s, I used a Beverage antenna to listen to the CBS Evening News from WCBS in New York, and WWL in New Orleans. Whenever one station faded, I just rocked the dial and the other station would be there. Portugal is on Greenwich time so the Evening News was around midnight local time. By then, most of the Europeans had signed off. All you must have for a Beverage antenna is a long wire, say 2 wavelengths long, aimed at the targeted broadcaster. For 690 KHz that would be 2,850 feet of wire, just over 1/2 a mile of wire. WHen he said "all you need" I was tempted to add "and space for that antenna". Of course, some people are lucky. You do hear of people doing really well with really long wire antennas, and presumably they have such great success because few have the space to have similar antennas. There was a guy in Australia forty years ago, Ray Knaughton (I'm sure I've misspelled that), who did moonbounce with rhombic antennas. He lived in the outback, so he had the space. Got enough gain to overcome Australia's 150W power limit at the time (I think it was that low). He had enough space for putting up high gain rhombics for various VHF bands. The big problem was that since they weren't steerable, he had a big limit on when he could do moonbounce, since the moon wasn't in the right place most of the time. Michael VE2BVW |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Living in Portugal in the 1950`s, I used a Beverage antenna to listen to
the CBS Evening News from WCBS in New York, and WWL in New Orleans. Whenever one station faded, I just rocked the dial and the other station would be there. Portugal is on Greenwich time so the Evening News was around midnight local time. By then, most of the Europeans had signed off. All you must have for a Beverage antenna is a long wire, say 2 wavelengths long, aimed at the targeted broadcaster. For 690 KHz that would be 2,850 feet of wire, just over 1/2 a mile of wire. WHen he said "all you need" I was tempted to add "and space for that antenna". Of course, some people are lucky. You do hear of people doing really well with really long wire antennas, and presumably they have such great success because few have the space to have similar antennas. In TN I had 25 acres and ran a 200+ ft long wire which was enough to pick up the Nashville stations. I once connected my antenna to the electric fence wire (after disconnecting the charger) that ran around about 1/2 of the place. Didn't do much. Here I have 16 acres which means I could, in theory, run about 2,000 ft of wire. Still I was thinking of something a little smaller. |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That is really simple cap=capacitor mesh=how much the plates overlap
On May 10, 7:54 am, "no spam" wrote: "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Wed, 09 May 2007 17:35:31 GMT, "no spam" wrote: I'm looking for plans for a simple AM antenna to connect to my stereo to replace the little loop antenna that came with it. In the past I have used long wires but they are not very directional. I have found some fairly good plans online for what looks like wire wound around a box but all of them seem to have potentiometer in the mix somewhere. It would be very little problem to build an aimable 18 to even 48 inch frame. I only have two AM stations I'd like to come in clearer (690 KHz and 1440 KHz). Would it be possible to make a 'box' with one 'tap' for 690 and one for 1440 then just connect one or the other the radio? How long would be wires need to be and how would I feed it into the connections on the radio (coax)? The simplest would be to find a variable capacitor from a derelict radio. The tuning range and size will force you to build the right size coil - which is vastly simpler to building the coil first and then finding the right variable capacitor. Using a cap from a derelict radio will give you the right minimum to maximum range variation (often with a max in the region of 360 pF just in case you cannot find a derelict radio). With the capacitor in its maximum mesh (or nearly so), you wind the box antenna until you find enough windings to peak the lowest frequency signal. The upper frequency signal should also peak when you open up the meshed plates. Mark the two peaks' positions of the variable cap's knob setting. Simple for you. My electronic education is limited to some high school and college physics and some 'playing' on my on. IOW, I know a cap isn't something you wear on your head but 'maximum mesh' sounds like either the gears in your transmission are working very well or your girl friend is wearing something sexy.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
no spam wrote:
"For 690 KHz that would be 2850 feet of wire, just over 1/2 mile of wire." Something like that. The site was a shortwave broadcast plant that had a rhombic aimed at New York for last ditch program relay in case all else failed. It was located at a far corner of many acres to be well out of the shortwave field. As we were not last ditching it, I borrowed its open wire transmission line, shorted it and fed it to my medium wave receiver. It worked like a champ. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "no spam" wrote in message . net... I'm looking for plans for a simple AM antenna to connect to my stereo to replace the little loop antenna that came with it. In the past I have used long wires but they are not very directional. I have found some fairly good plans online for what looks like wire wound around a box but all of them seem to have potentiometer in the mix somewhere. It would be very little problem to build an aimable 18 to even 48 inch frame. I only have two AM stations I'd like to come in clearer (690 KHz and 1440 KHz). Would it be possible to make a 'box' with one 'tap' for 690 and one for 1440 then just connect one or the other the radio? How long would be wires need to be and how would I feed it into the connections on the radio (coax)? Like Richard says, it's easier to find an old cap, and build the loop around the cap. The old analog dial stereo receivers have some of the best variables for this purpose. Most are multi gang caps, which often can approach 1000 pf or more if you tie all the gangs together. This can be handy for wide freq use as you can use switches and switch gangs in or out of the circuit to change freq coverage. Most stereo caps also had a few small gangs with low pf values, good stuff cut) Almost anything is easy if you know how to do it. I was looking for something really simple w/o any electronic parts in it. I posted several URLs with plans for building a loop like the one you are talking about. I naively thought I might just be able to take piece of wire that was a fraction of the wavelength of the freq and wrap it around a frame and aim it in the correct direction. But I didn't want to do all the work only to find out it wouldn't work. |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "no spam" wrote in message . net... I'm looking for plans for a simple AM antenna to connect to my stereo to replace the little loop antenna that came with it. In the past I have used long wires but they are not very directional. I have found some fairly good plans online for what looks like wire wound around a box but all of them seem to have potentiometer in the mix somewhere. It would be very little problem to build an aimable 18 to even 48 inch frame. I only have two AM stations I'd like to come in clearer (690 KHz and 1440 KHz). Would it be possible to make a 'box' with one 'tap' for 690 and one for 1440 then just connect one or the other the radio? How long would be wires need to be and how would I feed it into the connections on the radio (coax)? Like Richard says, it's easier to find an old cap, and build the loop around the cap. The old analog dial stereo receivers have some of the best variables for this purpose. Most are multi gang caps, which often can approach 1000 pf or more if you tie all the gangs together. This can be handy for wide freq use as you can use switches and switch gangs in or out of the circuit to change freq coverage. Most stereo caps also had a few small gangs with low pf values, good stuff cut) Almost anything is easy if you know how to do it. I was looking for something really simple w/o any electronic parts in it. I posted several URLs with plans for building a loop like the one you are talking about. I naively thought I might just be able to take piece of wire that was a fraction of the wavelength of the freq and wrap it around a frame and aim it in the correct direction. But I didn't want to do all the work only to find out it wouldn't work. OK: Start small. Identify a decent ground reasonably near the radio. Stretch as much wire as you can on a line away from the radio. Tie off (secure) the distant end as high and clear as possible. At the radio wrap, the free end of the wire around the radio several times near where the internal antenna is located. (The exact location can be easily found by any of several clever methods, not counting taking the back off.) Strip the insulation off the free end and attach it to the ground. I expect you will be gratified by the increase in signal strength. Caution, if you run this antenna near operating electrical/electronic equipment, you may pick up interference that will negate the increase in the desired signal. You will have to play with this. You may have to endure three or four unimpressive performances before you have that one kick-ass success that makes you let out a whoop. Life's like that. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question about receiving broadcast (AM/FM) radio | Equipment | |||
receiving HF antenna for urban conditions | Antenna | |||
What antenna for receiving video signal from ISS ? | Antenna | |||
Need some help designing a receiving antenna | Antenna | |||
Best Antenna for Receiving - NEWBIE | Antenna |