Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm starting a project with some other guys on a 6M beacon
which will end up on a mountaintop at around 10K ft in New Mexico. During winter, that means sub-zero temperatures, high winds, and ICE build-up on everything exposed. We would ideally like to put up an omnidirectional horizontally polarized antenna like a loop. Anyone have experience with building (or purchasing) such an antenna that would be sufficiently bulletproof to stand up to a severe weather environment? We could go vertical, of course, but since this beacon will be operating in a CW weak-signal environment under a wide variety of propagation modes (including ground wave, troposcatter, etc., where polarization is more important than it is with ionospheric propagation), we'd like to stay with horizontal if it's physically realistic to do that. What we don't want to have to do, however, is trek up to the mountain top every weekend to put the antenna back up. g Bill / W5WVO Albuquerque NM |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm starting a project with some other guys on a 6M beacon
which will end up on a mountaintop at around 10K ft in New Mexico. During winter, that means sub-zero temperatures, high winds, and ICE build-up on everything exposed. We would ideally like to put up an omnidirectional horizontally polarized antenna like a loop. Anyone have experience with building (or purchasing) such an antenna that would be sufficiently bulletproof to stand up to a severe weather environment? We could go vertical, of course, but since this beacon will be operating in a CW weak-signal environment under a wide variety of propagation modes (including ground wave, troposcatter, etc., where polarization is more important than it is with ionospheric propagation), we'd like to stay with horizontal if it's physically realistic to do that. What we don't want to have to do, however, is trek up to the mountain top every weekend to put the antenna back up. g Bill / W5WVO Albuquerque NM --------------------------- The neat thing about running a loop is you can put some DC through it in the winter to keep the ice off. KC*VIF Greg Z to thine own sound be true |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
greg z wrote:
We would ideally like to put up an omnidirectional horizontally polarized antenna like a loop. A vertical 6m loop wouldn't be omnidirectional and a horizontal 6m loop would send most of your power up at a take-off-angle of 60 degrees. How about a vertical folded monopole with a good ground plane? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil,
I think by a loop he meant something like a Halo. They seem to be pretty common with beacons. You could stack two of these vertically for gain, but at 6m the spacing gets kind of long. My concern would be that the thing still works when the matching element gets iced over. Bill: Talk to tyhe people at M Squared. Tam/WB2TT "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... greg z wrote: We would ideally like to put up an omnidirectional horizontally polarized antenna like a loop. A vertical 6m loop wouldn't be omnidirectional and a horizontal 6m loop would send most of your power up at a take-off-angle of 60 degrees. How about a vertical folded monopole with a good ground plane? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill VanAlstyne" wrote in message ...
I'm starting a project with some other guys on a 6M beacon which will end up on a mountaintop at around 10K ft in New Mexico. During winter, that means sub-zero temperatures, high winds, and ICE build-up on everything exposed. We would ideally like to put up an omnidirectional horizontally polarized antenna like a loop. Anyone have experience with building (or purchasing) such an antenna that would be sufficiently bulletproof to stand up to a severe weather environment? We could go vertical, of course, but since this beacon will be operating in a CW weak-signal environment under a wide variety of propagation modes (including ground wave, troposcatter, etc., where polarization is more important than it is with ionospheric propagation), we'd like to stay with horizontal if it's physically realistic to do that. What we don't want to have to do, however, is trek up to the mountain top every weekend to put the antenna back up. g I'd immediately consider a ruggedized Squalo. http://www.wia.org.au/armag/2002/AR_May02_TA1.pdf I doubt that the specific design shown in the article would take the kind of abuse you're talking about but it's a conceptual and dimensional starting point I'd make the loop from one inch copper water tube and 90 degree soldered copper elbows. I wouldn't use a gamma match, they're trouble looking for a place to start in an application like this. I'd attach a few feet of some kind of good RG-8 size coax directly to the feedpoints and string (suitable) ferrite beads on the coax right at the feedpoint. Then run the coax down the antenna support to a sealed box which contains some sort of simple tuning network which would be completely out of the weather. I'd also make really sure the loop was well supported including nonconductive struts from the support mast to the far corners of the loop. There would be a good bit of cut and try involved, material selection issues and mechanical details to be worked out but hey, that's ham radio for ya! Bill / W5WVO Albuquerque NM Brian w3rv --------------------------- The neat thing about running a loop is you can put some DC through it in the winter to keep the ice off. Where are ya gonna get those kinds of amps? As in amperes. KC*VIF Greg Z to thine own sound be true |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "greg z" wrote in message ... I'm starting a project with some other guys on a 6M beacon which will end up on a mountaintop at around 10K ft in New Mexico. During winter, that means sub-zero temperatures, high winds, and ICE build-up on everything exposed. We would ideally like to put up an omnidirectional horizontally polarized antenna like a loop. Anyone have experience with building (or purchasing) such an antenna that would be sufficiently bulletproof to stand up to a severe weather environment? We could go vertical, of course, but since this beacon will be operating in a CW weak-signal environment under a wide variety of propagation modes (including ground wave, troposcatter, etc., where polarization is more important than it is with ionospheric propagation), we'd like to stay with horizontal if it's physically realistic to do that. What we don't want to have to do, however, is trek up to the mountain top every weekend to put the antenna back up. g Bill / W5WVO Albuquerque NM Omni (quasi) loops for V/U are open at the far end HF loops (typically 1 wavelength) that are closed loops) have a pattern almost identical to a dipole- i.e. not even close to omni Dale W4OP |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 17:51:32 GMT, "Dale Parfitt"
wrote: "greg z" wrote in message ... I'm starting a project with some other guys on a 6M beacon which will end up on a mountaintop at around 10K ft in New Mexico. During winter, that means sub-zero temperatures, high winds, and ICE build-up on everything exposed. We would ideally like to put up an omnidirectional horizontally polarized antenna like a loop. Anyone have experience with building (or purchasing) such an antenna that would be sufficiently bulletproof to stand up to a severe weather environment? We could go vertical, of course, but since this beacon will be operating in a CW weak-signal environment under a wide variety of propagation modes (including ground wave, troposcatter, etc., where polarization is more important than it is with ionospheric propagation), we'd like to stay with horizontal if it's physically realistic to do that. What we don't want to have to do, however, is trek up to the mountain top every weekend to put the antenna back up. g Bill / W5WVO Albuquerque NM Omni (quasi) loops for V/U are open at the far end HF loops (typically 1 wavelength) that are closed loops) have a pattern almost identical to a dipole- i.e. not even close to omni Dale W4OP Huh!? According to the article on L. B. Cebik's web page, a one-wavelength horizontally oriented, horizontally polarized loop antenna has a nearly circular pattern. As a large loop is driven by increasing frequencies, the pattern becomes more like a starfish, but it radiates relatively symmetrically in several directions, the number of lobes increasing with frequency. A dipole has a broad figure-of-eight pattern and a pair of strong lobes with minor lide-lobes as it is driven by increasing frequencies. Try modelling a dipole and a closed loop and see for yourself, don't believe me. Russ |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Russ wrote:
"Dale Parfitt" wrote: HF loops (typically 1 wavelength) that are closed loops) have a pattern almost identical to a dipole- i.e. not even close to omn Huh!? According to the article on L. B. Cebik's web page, a one-wavelength horizontally oriented, horizontally polarized loop antenna has a nearly circular pattern. Dale is obviously talking about a vertically oriented loop. And a one wavelength horizontal loop is not a good omnidirectional antenna. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greg wrote:
"We would ideally like to put up an omnidirectional horizontally polarized antenna like a loop." FM and TV broadcasters do it and succeed amid adversity. In the US, TV channel 2 is very near to 6 meters in wavelength. Now broadcasters may opt for circular polarization, but in early times they used horizontal polarization. If crossed perpendicular dipoles are fed 90-degrees ouy-of-phase, the combination is called a turnstile array. The turnstile antenna produces a pattern that is nearly circular in the plane of the turnstile. Due to the usual 1/2-wavelength of the turnstile elements and coupling to their supports, there are often dimples in the "circular" pattern which give an appearance of crossed figures of eight. For practical purposes, the pattern circularity is usually good enough for the turnstile to be accepted for VHF and UHF broadcasting. Folded dipoles often make up the turnstile for the convenience of their impedance when electrically connected in parallel and for the lightning protection provided by closed-circuit antennas. A single folded dipole is often wrapped into a halo shape with a small gap between its ends for omnidirectional service and greater simplicity than the turnstile. Capacitor plates are often added to the short-circuited ends of the folded dipole to increase the capacitance between its ends and thus improve current distribution which improves pattern circularity. An array of such halos in a vertical stack can provide gain by concentrating energy into a horizontal beam. Phasing adjustments between elements stacked into the array of halos can tilt the beam up or down from the horizontal. High antennas often use a couple of degrees of downward beam tilt to improve signals near the station and to reduce power loss in radiiation toward the zenith. Delaying the feed to each next higher element by an additional 4 or 5 degrees often depresses the elevation angle below the horizontal by a degree or two. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Previously: "An array of such halos in a vertical stack can
provide gain by concentrating energy into a horizontal beam." ____________ N. B. A vertically stacked array of ANY kind of radiating element with ~ 1 lambda or less spacing can produce gain in the horizontal plane. RF Visit http://rfry.org for FM broadcast RF system papers. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |