Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi:
Please don't be annoyed/offended by my question as I decreased the modulation frequency to where it would actually be realistic. I have a very weird question about electromagnetic radiation, carriers, and modulators. Is it mathematically-possible to carry a modulator signal [in this case, a pure-sine-wave-tone] with a frequency of 20 KHz and an amplitude of 1-watt-per-meter-squared on a AM carrier signal whose frequency is 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) nanocycle* every 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 giga- eons and whose amplitude is a minimum of 10^1,000,000,000-to-the- power-10^1,000,000,000 gigaphotons per 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the- power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond? If it is not mathematically-possible, then please explain why. 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) second is an extremely short amount of time. 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the- power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond is even shorter because a nanosecond is shorter than a second. Giga-eon = a billion eons Eon = a billion years *nanocycle = billionth of a cycle Gigaphoton = a billion photons 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 -- now that is one large large number. 10^1,000,000,000 = 10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000 So you get: (10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) to the power (10-to-the- power-1,000,000,000) 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) = 10^-(10-to-the- power-1,000,000,000)-to-the-power-(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) 10^-(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) to the power (10-to-the- power-1,000,000,000) is an extremely small number at it equals 10-to- the-power-NEGATIVE-[(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) to the power (10- to-the-power-1,000,000,000)] No offense but please respond with reasonable answers & keep out the jokes, off-topic nonsense, taunts, insults, and trivializations. I am really interested in this. Thanks, Radium |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Radium wrote:
... Is it mathematically-possible to carry a modulator signal [in this case, a pure-sine-wave-tone] with a frequency of 20 KHz and an amplitude of 1-watt-per-meter-squared on a AM carrier signal whose The 20 Khz is obviously NOT an audio tone, but exists as VLF, what you are terming "modulation" is actually a mixing of carriers then ... and the problem with your question ONLY BEGINS there! JS |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 29, 8:08 pm, John Smith I wrote:
The 20 Khz is obviously NOT an audio tone, Yes it is. 20 KHz is the highest audible frequency. Humans hear from 20 to 20,000 Hz. No offense but WTF are you thinking?? but exists as VLF, what you are terming "modulation" is actually a mixing of carriers then ... and the problem with your question ONLY BEGINS there! A carrier wave is modulated by the modulator wave. On most AM stations, the modulator wave consists of the voice of someone speaking. Most AM stations have carrier frequencies in the medium wave band - in the range of 520,000 to 1,160,000 cycles every 1 second. In the case I am describing, the modulator wave is a 20 KHz pure sine- wave tone on a carrier frequency of 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the- power-10^1,000,000,000) nanocycle every 10^1,000,000,000-to-the- power-10^1,000,000,000 giga-eons. Is this scenario mathematically- possible? If not, then why?? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Radium wrote:
WTF are you thinking when you describe the 20 Khz signal as, "a pure-sine-wave-tone] with a frequency of 20 KHz and an amplitude of 1-watt-per-meter-squared" One square meter of copper wire squared, a squared meter of modulation xfrmr ... ? Your question sounds like one of a high school physics student attempting to ask a seemingly logical--yet complex question, and of no real world value. Your ability at obfuscation is only mundane ... If what you say is true, you have an interest, what is the purpose of your question? JS |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 29, 9:15 pm, John Smith I wrote:
Radium wrote: WTF are you thinking when you describe the 20 Khz signal as, "a pure-sine-wave-tone] with a frequency of 20 KHz and an amplitude of 1-watt-per-meter-squared" One square meter of copper wire squared, a squared meter of modulation xfrmr ... ? Sorry that should be 1 X [10^-6] Watts-per-m^2 http://www.glenbrook.k12.il.us/GBSSC...nd/u11l2b.html 1 X [10^-6] Watts-per-m^2 is about the loudness of a "normal conversation" according to the above link. F-------------------king typos!!!!!!!!!! Your question sounds like one of a high school physics student attempting to ask a seemingly logical--yet complex question, and of no real world value. Your ability at obfuscation is only mundane ... If what you say is true, you have an interest, what is the purpose of your question? My basic question is if I have an AM receiver which receives signals on a carrier frequency of Fc, is it mathematically-possible for me to receive a modulator signal -- on that station -- of a frequency higher than Fc? If not, then why? If not, then how are the submarines which use ELFs [Extremely Low carrier Frequencies around 3 to 30 Hz] able to perform voice communications? I just stretched the question out to astronomical extremes. I have a habit of doing that. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rec.radio.amateur.antenna Radium wrote:
Hi: Please don't be annoyed/offended by my question as I decreased the modulation frequency to where it would actually be realistic. I have a very weird question about electromagnetic radiation, carriers, and modulators. Is it mathematically-possible to carry a modulator signal [in this case, a pure-sine-wave-tone] with a frequency of 20 KHz and an amplitude of 1-watt-per-meter-squared on a AM carrier signal whose The fact that you specified the modulation in W/M^2 immediately says you don't know WTF you are talking about and the question is meaningless. You can AM modulate any frequency 0 Fc infinity with any other frequency 0 Fm infinity. Whether it's physically possible or results in massive distortion is a separate issue. snip inane crap -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Radium" wrote in message ps.com... My basic question is if I have an AM receiver which receives signals on a carrier frequency of Fc, is it mathematically-possible for me to receive a modulator signal -- on that station -- of a frequency higher than Fc? If not, then why? If not, then how are the submarines which use ELFs [Extremely Low carrier Frequencies around 3 to 30 Hz] able to perform voice communications? I just stretched the question out to astronomical extremes. I have a habit of doing that. Why not simply ask the question you mean to ask, then, rather than the absurd numbers you put in the original version of this (and which you then expect everyone to work through, just to see what the hell you might be talking about)? The answer to the question you seem to be asking is obvious if you simply work through the mathematics of what is going on in amplitude modulation. So why not simply do that, and not ask such incredibly obtuse questions? One hint: the ELF submarine communications to which you refer are NOT carrying voice communications, but very low-rate CW ("Morse code," if you want to think of it that way) signalling. Bob M. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 29, 10:10 pm, "Bob Myers" wrote:
"Radium" wrote in message ps.com... My basic question is if I have an AM receiver which receives signals on a carrier frequency of Fc, is it mathematically-possible for me to receive a modulator signal -- on that station -- of a frequency higher than Fc? If not, then why? If not, then how are the submarines which use ELFs [Extremely Low carrier Frequencies around 3 to 30 Hz] able to perform voice communications? I just stretched the question out to astronomical extremes. I have a habit of doing that. Why not simply ask the question you mean to ask, then, rather than the absurd numbers you put in the original version of this (and which you then expect everyone to work through, just to see what the hell you might be talking about)? The answer to the question you seem to be asking is obvious if you simply work through the mathematics of what is going on in amplitude modulation. So why not simply do that, and not ask such incredibly obtuse questions? One hint: the ELF submarine communications to which you refer are NOT carrying voice communications, but very low-rate CW ("Morse code," if you want to think of it that way) signalling. Bob M. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
AM electromagnetic waves: astronomically-high modulation frequency on an astronomically-low carrier frequency | Antenna | |||
AM electromagnetic waves: astronomically-high modulation frequency on an astronomically-low carrier frequency | Shortwave | |||
DC waves??? Magic frequency??? | Antenna | |||
Electromagnetic frequency allocations in xml ? | General | |||
Which digital readout receivers always show the carrier frequency no matter what mode? | Shortwave |