Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I think I asked this question before some months ago but can't find it with google / dejanews and anyway I'm not entirely certain I fully understood the answer. I am putting up an inverted vee fed with ladder line and a tuner, that I want to use from 160 through 10, but mostly on 160 through 40. The space I have to put it up is large enough for a half wave on 160 and then some. Since I am feeding with ladder line and a tuner, is there a particular advantage to cutting the antenna as a half wavelength on 160, or would I be just as well off to make it as long as I have space for without considering its actual resonant frequency? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rick (W-A-one-R-K-T) wrote:
Since I am feeding with ladder line and a tuner, is there a particular advantage to cutting the antenna as a half wavelength on 160, or would I be just as well off to make it as long as I have space for without considering its actual resonant frequency? Fed with ladder-line, there is no particular advantage to making the dipole 1/2WL long. If the feedpoint impedance is 50 ohms, the SWR will be 9:1 on 450 ohm ladder-line. The impedance seen by the tuner will be some transformed impedance associated with that 9:1 SWR and can range up to 4050 ohms if the feedline length is 1/4WL. I personally like to feed a 75m 1/2WL dipole with 1/2WL of ladder-line to duplicate the antenna feedpoint impedance at the tuner but that results in an unwieldy ladder-line length of 233 feet on 160m. In fact, one popular length for 160m is a 204 foot dipole center-fed with 60-100 foot of ladder-line. With 60 feet of ladder-line, it is known as the double-sized G5RV. With 60+ to 100 feet of ladder-line, the impedance seen by the tuner on 160m is fairly low with some inductive reactance. Another consideration for dipole length is the EDZ length frequency. If you divide 1200 by the length of the dipole, you will get the EDZ frequency in MHz. Above the EDZ frequency, the radiation pattern breaks up into multiple lobes with a smaller amount of broadside radiation. The free demo version of EZNEC will predict the radiation patterns. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Rick (W-A-one-R-K-T)" wrote in
news ![]() I think I asked this question before some months ago but can't find it with google / dejanews and anyway I'm not entirely certain I fully understood the answer. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Optimum length for ladder-fed dipole | Antenna | |||
Dipole and Ladder Line Matching | Antenna | |||
Feed Line Length - Ladder Line | Antenna | |||
Coax Length for G5RV and Center Support for Ladder Line ? | Antenna | |||
Length of ladder wire for G4RV "Junior: antenna | Antenna |