Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Walter Maxwell"
Richard, I just now tried to access your link above, but it says the file is no longer available. Do you have any other source of this data? I worked with BL&E, so I'm kinda partial to having all the data from their 1936 experiment that I can find. I have their 1937 IRE paper. _________ Walt - I showed the working link in another post I made in followup, which should work for you. The link (again) is http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h8...ndERadials.gif But if you have their 1937 paper, you already have the figures I referred to. RF |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Fry wrote:
"So it`s not just the number of radials that is important, but also their length." True. I don`t have B.L. and E`s work to refer to but do recall an observation that to get the best ground connection for the least copper it might be wise to cut the radials in half so that their number might be doubled. The FCC standard is 120 radials, each 1/4-wavelength long, which may seem extreme but it produces a near perfect ground connection. Fortunately, the length of radials does not need to be increased in direct proportion to wavelength below the broadcast band as skin effect varies with the square root of the frequency so as we go lower in frequency we need to increase length of the radials by the square root of the wavelength to keep the resistance of our contact constant. Best Regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard Harrison" wrote
Fortunately, the length of radials does not need to be increased in direct proportion to wavelength below the broadcast band as skin effect varies with the square root of the frequency so as we go lower in frequency we need to increase length of the radials by the square root of the wavelength to keep the resistance of our contact constant. ____________ Here is a quote about this from RADIO ANTENNA ENGINEERING by Edmund Laport: "The distance from the antenna at which returning ground currents are of such a low value as to be negligible is of the order of 0.5 wavelength." At least across the AM broadcast band 530-1700 kHz, Laport, Terman, Kraus, and Balanis show _no_ dependence of the lengths of buried radials with frequency -- except, of course, that radials used with lower frequency systems need to be physically longer to reach the desired radius from the monopole, in free-space wavelengths. The FCC uses a computer program (linked below) to calculate the groundwave inverse distance field at 1 km and 1 mile from a MW monopole, based on the radiator height and the number/length of buried radials. On-line users of this program can enter their own system parameters to see their effects on the radiated field. The program does restrict entries to the minimum values acceptable to the FCC for commercial AM broadcast stations. == NOTE: The FCC program applet has no entry block for frequency. Here is the link. The applet starts at the bottom of that web page. http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/bickel/figure8.html RF |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
== NOTE: The FCC program applet has no entry block for frequency.
_________ Yes it does (sorry), but ... == NOTE: The FCC program results are essentially the same regardless of frequency for all systems of a given radiator height and radial length (in wavelengths), when using the same number of radials. RF |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... I have installed a FAA approved NDB beacon here at our private airport located in Manchester,TN . The Beacon is transmitting on 529 KHZ Carrier power is 50 watts the facility Id is : LYQ I have shunt feed a 120 foot high Rhon 25G tower. The tap wire (3/8 dia aluminum 'power line' cable) is at the 90 foot level runs down the face of the tower with 24 inch spacing to the matching network. I am using the 'Gamma' match network : the SWR is down to 1.2 or so. The top of the tower has 4 ten foot radials The base of the tower has 8 200 foot 3/ 8 inch aluminum cable radials we plan to add more. The tower has a 3/8 'power line' type cable from the top to the base to ensure bonding of each section. When I fly the Company's Jetstar from 1000 to 41,000 feet, I get solid points on the RMI indicator: when I pass right over the beacon tower the RMI needle swings to the tail indicating positive station passage. The problem is the range of the LYQ beacon it seems to work 10 miles or less??? The airplane has dual ADF systems that work perfect. As an aside, 10 miles away, is another ADF beacon on 332 KHZ 25 watts! using the traditional three strand 'flat top' suspended between two telephone poles. The vertical radiator for this beacon is less than 60 feet high : I can track the beacon out to 70 miles or so! Is a shunt feed tower lossy??? poor radiator??? comments??? I am a Ham op WA4SZE : by the way, we will QSL the beacon when we get it commissioned. Thanks!! The one that works is probably an FAA facility and has a better ground system. The one I helped install had 96 buried radials. I was surprised that they werent that long. Same length as the flat top , Guessing 30 ft. I do know the antenna was 10 meters tall tophat and radials were probably close to being the same. Jimmie |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Shunt fed vertical? | Antenna | |||
Shunt Feeding a Tower for Top Band | Antenna | |||
shunt fed AM Sticks | Broadcasting | |||
tower shunt feed for 160m | Antenna | |||
FL 2100B shunt value? | Boatanchors |