Over the last 10 years or more I have posed questions about antennas
that are connected to Gaussian antennas.
Tho I have many threads with this group on the subject I have decided
not to deal peace meal with it anymore as some are tiring of the
subject. If amateurs wish to review the subject in its entirety I have
scrammbled together everything I have done on the subject in a
somewhat thesis form where I can revise , update or format at a later
time. The thesis can be seen at:

http://users.sdsc.edu/~unwin/

Hopefully the readability of the text will be improved from what you
have read in the past. At least
the subject as I see it can be viewed by my peers as time permits or
between hams in their discussions.
I can now catch up on all the honey doo's that have really piled up
while taking a occasional view on what is happening in other areas.
Thanks for any deliberations that may be incurred in the future
Best Regards
Art Unwin KB9MZ.......XG(uk)
Bloomington
Illinois

art wrote:
Over the last 10 years or more I have posed questions about antennas
that are connected to Gaussian antennas.

Why would you want to connect an antenna to an antenna?

Usually, one connects an antenna to a transmitter and/or a receiver.

Then again, nothing you post makes the slightest bit of sense.

snip remaining babble

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

"art" wrote in message
oups.com...
Over the last 10 years or more I have posed questions about antennas

it took 10 years to come up with that???

subject. If amateurs wish to review the subject in its entirety I have
scrammbled together everything I have done on the subject in a

scrambled is the proper word... i'm so glad you put all that in one place so
we can all point at it any time you come back and post on here so everyone
can see how far off base your theory is.

please, spend lots of time on honey-do's.

On Jul 5, 7:53 pm, art wrote:
Over the last 10 years or more I have posed questions about antennas
that are connected to Gaussian antennas.
Tho I have many threads with this group on the subject I have decided
not to deal peace meal with it anymore as some are tiring of the
subject. If amateurs wish to review the subject in its entirety I have
scrammbled together everything I have done on the subject in a
somewhat thesis form where I can revise , update or format at a later
time. The thesis can be seen at:

http://users.sdsc.edu/~unwin/

Hopefully the readability of the text will be improved from what you
have read in the past. At least
the subject as I see it can be viewed by my peers as time permits or
between hams in their discussions.
I can now catch up on all the honey doo's that have really piled up
while taking a occasional view on what is happening in other areas.
Thanks for any deliberations that may be incurred in the future
Best Regards
Art Unwin KB9MZ.......XG(uk)
Bloomington
Illinois
Art,

I was curious who Isaac Maxwell might be. Could he be the artist, or
the farmer? Those were the two prime candidates I found with a Google
search.

I'm very sorry to say that things didn't get any better as I read
further. At the very least, Art, please have someone with good
technical editing skills review such things, and work with that person
to refine the writing so that whatever ideas you wish to communicate
flow in a smooth and logical way. That advice is completely
independent of my thoughts about any technical content of the
referenced article.

Regards,
Tom

"K7ITM" wrote in message

I was curious who Isaac Maxwell might be.

that is the person who figured out how to cross gravitation with
electro-magnetic effects to create equilibrium in gaussian antennas.

"Dave" wrote in message news:Mjvji.17$lY4.0@trndny07...

"K7ITM" wrote in message

I was curious who Isaac Maxwell might be.

that is the person who figured out how to cross gravitation with
electro-magnetic effects to create equilibrium in gaussian antennas.

Is this a "Unified field theory"?

On 6 Jul, 10:59, "Frank's"
wrote:
"Dave" wrote in messagenews:Mjvji.17$lY4.0@trndny07...

"K7ITM" wrote in message

I was curious who Isaac Maxwell might be.

that is the person who figured out how to cross gravitation with
electro-magnetic effects to create equilibrium in gaussian antennas.

Is this a "Unified field theory"?

Frank,
If I used the name Isaac it must be refering to Newton.
I will check it out in a month or so and then correct it.
I did use the Newtonian aproach is some areas
I really don't have time for it anymore.
In one quick swoop I put the whole story on the net
so the facts don't get lost in time.
Some one someday will come along and decipher my thoughts
in a rational way and explain it better.
One thing that I really wanted to get across was the
hold up in energy/current flow created by energy storage by
inductance and capacitance where the energy release
can be in vector form to overcome the inertia of static particles.
These pulses of energy swarms immediately challenges the common
thought of magnetic fields and waves which hold the stage
at the present time. Now we have the platform of two energy
sinks that release their energy instaantaneously in a similar
way to a photographic flash bulb. Recommend putting
capacitance inductance in the google search to review phase
changes during charge
prior to energy release to bring things into perspective.
We produced a gaussian antenna from Gaussian law but for total
confidence
in the theorem I attacked the problem from many different angles and
laws
to probe the possibility that an accepted law was violated some where.
I did not find a violation.
Art