Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This explains the "Casimir Effect:"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kashmir_effect This indicates that a sound method has been discovered to manipulate it: http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/21...ack-levitation Now, one can only speculate as to whether this will have possible effects on the design/implementation of future antennas ... or possibly lead to the "discovery" of new/"previously unknown" laws/forces which have been in play and beyond our vision. Regards, JS |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Smith I" wrote in message ... This explains the "Casimir Effect:" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kashmir_effect This indicates that a sound method has been discovered to manipulate it: http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/21...ack-levitation Now, one can only speculate as to whether this will have possible effects on the design/implementation of future antennas ... or possibly lead to the "discovery" of new/"previously unknown" laws/forces which have been in play and beyond our vision. Regards, JS John So you tie an antenna wire to a gecko and get it to run up the nearest tall object? :-) Mike G0ULI |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 09:08:07 -0700, John Smith I
wrote: This explains the "Casimir Effect:" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kashmir_effect This indicates that a sound method has been discovered to manipulate it: http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/21...ack-levitation Remember Pons and Fleishman? Now, one can only speculate as to whether this will have possible effects on the design/implementation of future antennas ... or possibly lead to the "discovery" of new/"previously unknown" laws/forces which have been in play and beyond our vision. Gad, just what we need is more existential fodder for Arthur (except you leaped to an antenna connection before he could opine "throw away the text books"). Future nano antennas? At this scale, there is nothing so amusing as those in, over their heads. It may shock many to discover that resonance becomes decoupled from scaling at this -um- scale. This isn't your dad's quarterwave monopole anymore. Another message from Western Union, the Casimir effect was well known CENTURIES ago to sailors. It was only myopic scientists who re-discovered it under their microscope and put a label to it in spite of this common knowledge. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
Another message from Western Union, the Casimir effect was well known CENTURIES ago to sailors. It was only myopic scientists who re-discovered it under their microscope and put a label to it in spite of this common knowledge. Centuries ago it was nearly impossible for sailors to find anyone who would publish their nanoelectronics research. :-) ac6xg |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
... Another message from Western Union, the Casimir effect was well known CENTURIES ago to sailors. It was only myopic scientists who re-discovered it under their microscope and put a label to it in spite of this common knowledge. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Well, did they claim to have levitated atomic sized particles? Regards, JS |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Kaliski wrote:
... So you tie an antenna wire to a gecko and get it to run up the nearest tall object? :-) Mike G0ULI So? Your claim is the Casimir Effect only has domain over atomic sized particles and "possibly" larger? Interesting, I would take your bet ... if it affects atomic sized particles, it will be found to affect smaller; and bigger, I wonder? But, apparently, that/those questions are being posed ... Regards, JS |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
Centuries ago it was nearly impossible for sailors to find anyone who would publish their nanoelectronics research. :-) ac6xg Jim: I am busting a gut here, the humor is greatly appreciated. Regards, JS |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Kaliski wrote:
So you tie an antenna wire to a gecko and get it to run up the nearest tall object? :-) Mike G0ULI Yanno? Come to think of it, if they really do have a crashed alien craft or two, and are reverse engineering 'em, you'd just have to expect something like this to develop somewhere at sometime; wouldn't ya? grin Regards, JS |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 14:48:16 -0700, John Smith I
wrote: Richard Clark wrote: ... Another message from Western Union, the Casimir effect was well known CENTURIES ago to sailors. It was only myopic scientists who re-discovered it under their microscope and put a label to it in spite of this common knowledge. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Well, did they claim to have levitated atomic sized particles? Talk about the claims of Tritonic minnows. The Casimir effect is a specious example of a larger effect. Centuries ago (and even now, if anyone cares to attempt it), when ships are side-by-side, in close proximity, a difference in energy level pressing on the ship's hulls is found to draw them together into collision. For others: The wave energy in the sea comes in many wavelengths and is equally distributed upon the surface of a large ship (no appeals to nanotechnology is required to understand any of this). As a result, the combined force is washed out, so to speak. The net force of all energies does not otherwise move nor change the course of a ship. However, when two ships are running parallel tracks close together, the space between them limits the frequency of wavelengths between them. There is thus a smaller range of energies present between the ships. The balance in energies applied to all sides of either ship is lost. That loss is found in the parallel faces of the hulls and the remaining original forces cause the ships to draw together and collide. Now, what has this got to do with nanotechnology? NADA. What has this got to do with antennas? NADA. What sort of lens would reverse this effect in ships to push them apart (so called levitation of the Super Man comix)? The reader can rest well to imagine another shaggy dog proposal. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
... 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Nice fairytale; and given all the time at sea, those sailors certainly would have had the time to dream it up; and, it is easy for one to imagine as holding water. However, the rising and falling of the ships would create a "pumping effect" between the said ships ... As, the ships rise on the wave, the ships tend to be "pushed" together by the fact that water on all the outsides of the ships finds it easier to flow up to, and onto, the ships, leaving a "partial vacuum" in between the ships due to the fact water "flowing in" between the ships faces more resistance getting in their. Now, as the wave subsides, the ships are "held together" by the fact the water "flowing out" between the ships faces much more resistance than the water flowing away on the outsides ... the ships eventually end up touching. While the Casimir Effect may, or may not, relate to this phenomenon in some esoteric and abstract way--I rather doubt it! silly grin QUIT PULLING RICHARD! I FEEL MY ONE LEG, YOU ARE PULLING, GETTING LONGER ALREADY. :-) Regards, JS |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Antennas future | Antenna | |||
Stealing Knowledge ! | Shortwave | |||
The impact of the abolishment of CW in France | Policy | |||
FT-100D question: Is ALC a good indication of modulation? | Equipment | |||
FT-100D question: Is ALC a good indication of modulation? | Equipment |