Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Smith I wrote:
http://www.redherring.com/Home/22562 JS Allot like dumping crude oil into a creek for 'Easy Transportation to the Refinery', no extra infrastructure required. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Smith I wrote:
http://www.redherring.com/Home/22562 It's "your" own fault. When I complained to Google, no one else did. When I suggested a boycot of Google, everyone thought I was crazy. It was "your" choice, Google and their BPL, or Ham radio. Which did you decide? Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM IL Voice: (07)-7424-1667 U.S. Voice: 1-215-821-1838 Visit my 'blog at http://geoffstechno.livejournal.com/ |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
... It was "your" choice, Google and their BPL, or Ham radio. Which did you decide? Geoff. When the sword challenged the rock, the sword won. When the gun challenged the sword, the gun won. When the automobile challenged the horse, the auto won. When the washing machine challenged the washboard, the machine won. When tubes challenged the spark-gap xmitter, the tube won. When penicillin challenged herbs, penicillin won. When the birth control pill challenged the condom, the pill won. Now the internet challenges code tapping amateurs ... Regards, JS |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Smith I wrote:
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote: ... It was "your" choice, Google and their BPL, or Ham radio. Which did you decide? Geoff. When the sword challenged the rock, the sword won. When the gun challenged the sword, the gun won. When the automobile challenged the horse, the auto won. When the washing machine challenged the washboard, the machine won. When tubes challenged the spark-gap xmitter, the tube won. When penicillin challenged herbs, penicillin won. When the birth control pill challenged the condom, the pill won. Now the internet challenges code tapping amateurs ... Regards, JS Oh yeah, and I forgot, but you are quite correct. They were warned; and, they thought they knew better. But then, their history does not reflect one of a well educated or "gray matter endowed" group ... the few intelligent amateurs' voice were drowned out by the insane masses .... now we have what they strode towards with such determination, while beating out a war march tune on their brass keys--amateur freqs will be assimilated by the internet, resistance is futile ... and God seen this was good ... Regards, JS |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Smith I wrote:
http://www.redherring.com/Home/22562 JS Hello John and all: One of the things that I haven't seen covered about BPL, is the installation and maintenance costs involved, in a power grid system. We all know that when a system is modified for something that it wasn't designed for that problems will surface. I'll bet money that the power grid system modification and maintenance may be have a significant cost. That was not totally covered, or audited. Jay in the Mojave |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Smith I wrote:
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote: ... It was "your" choice, Google and their BPL, or Ham radio. Which did you decide? Geoff. When the sword challenged the rock, the sword won. When the gun challenged the sword, the gun won. When the automobile challenged the horse, the auto won. When the washing machine challenged the washboard, the machine won. When tubes challenged the spark-gap xmitter, the tube won. When penicillin challenged herbs, penicillin won. When the birth control pill challenged the condom, the pill won. Now the internet challenges code tapping amateurs ... Regards, JS This has nothing to do with the Internet or code tapping amateurs. It has to do with some intellectually devoid engineers challenging the reality of the Nyquist rate and placing a device on the only radio frequencys that can be naturally propagated through out the planet. This group will be beaming porn wirelessly throughout the world, what an accomplishment. They should feel proud! Chris |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Christopher Cox wrote:
John Smith I wrote: ... Now the internet challenges code tapping amateurs ... This has nothing to do with the Internet or code tapping amateurs. It has to do with some intellectually devoid engineers challenging the reality of the Nyquist rate and placing a device on the only radio frequencys that can be naturally propagated through out the planet. No, I think the engineers are saying 'It can be done, but it will interfere...' and the bean counters look at the 'but it will interfere...' part as the obstacle to overcome (buy off). Engineers don't call the shots, the lawyers and accountants do. If you want someone or something to blame, blame the 'any profit is good' mind set of the greed heads and the politicians who obey their big campaign contributors. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 16, 12:03 am, John Smith I wrote:
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote: ... It was "your" choice, Google and their BPL, or Ham radio. Which did you decide? Geoff. When the sword challenged the rock, the sword won. When the gun challenged the sword, the gun won. When the automobile challenged the horse, the auto won. When the washing machine challenged the washboard, the machine won. When tubes challenged the spark-gap xmitter, the tube won. When penicillin challenged herbs, penicillin won. When the birth control pill challenged the condom, the pill won. Now the internet challenges code tapping amateurs ... When my henry 2k classic and yagi pointed at the power line challenges BPL... Hummmm, this could get ugly... No matter what mode I use. BPL is a two lane highway. I should be as much of a pest them to them, as them to me.. Two weeks of me, and I'll have the BPL/power company speaking in tongues if they ever decide to install that mess around here. MK |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
gwatts wrote:
Christopher Cox wrote: John Smith I wrote: ... Now the internet challenges code tapping amateurs ... This has nothing to do with the Internet or code tapping amateurs. It has to do with some intellectually devoid engineers challenging the reality of the Nyquist rate and placing a device on the only radio frequencys that can be naturally propagated through out the planet. No, I think the engineers are saying 'It can be done, but it will interfere...' and the bean counters look at the 'but it will interfere...' part as the obstacle to overcome (buy off). Engineers don't call the shots, the lawyers and accountants do. If you want someone or something to blame, blame the 'any profit is good' mind set of the greed heads and the politicians who obey their big campaign contributors. I apologize for specifying "Engineers" in my previous post, it was not intentional. It is frustrating when fact is trumped by the use of relentless verbiage. Chris |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Elmer strikes again | Radio Photos | |||
Question About US Strikes In Somalia | CB | |||
Tri-Faced Robesin Strikes Out Again | Policy | |||
Roger strikes again | General | |||
The Uncle strikes again! | CB |