http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/mai...cispeed116.xml
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/mai...cispeed116.xml
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Is it like Goosian thing in the tunnnnelll? Like, light is soooo fast that
it comes on like before you flick the switch?

Yuri K3BU.us

Cecil Moore wrote:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/mai...cispeed116.xml


This immediately suggests possible and interesting uses in
cooling/refrigeration, if this "scientific discovery" holds water ...

Regards,
JS

"Yuri Blanarovich" wrote in message
...

"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/mai...cispeed116.xml
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Is it like Goosian thing in the tunnnnelll? Like, light is soooo fast that
it comes on like before you flick the switch?

Yuri K3BU.us



tunneling doesnt take faster than light speed to explain, only that there
are more than three dimensions to space. In some dimension the begining and
end was not as far apart as the scientist thought they were. In other words
you dont travel faster than light, you just take a short cut.

Jimmie

John Smith I wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/mai...cispeed116.xml

This immediately suggests possible and interesting uses in
cooling/refrigeration, if this "scientific discovery" holds water ...

Entangled particles may be a tunneling of sorts through
space-time. It has been proved to my satisfaction that
reality is non-local.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Jimmie D wrote:
tunneling doesnt take faster than light speed to explain, only that there
are more than three dimensions to space. In some dimension the begining and
end was not as far apart as the scientist thought they were. In other words
you dont travel faster than light, you just take a short cut.

Beam me up, Scottie, and engage at Warp 6.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/mai...cispeed116.xml
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Seems I got shot down in flames when I mentioned this very topic a couple of
months ago. Or maybe it was my attempt to try and visualise how this
phenomenon might take place. :-(

If optical photons can tunnel through opaque materials, then why not radio
frequency photons? An antenna made completely of insulating materials would
at least reduce the risk of lightning strikes. :-)

Mike G0ULI

Mike Kaliski wrote:
Seems I got shot down in flames when I mentioned this very topic a couple of
months ago.

Sounds like you experienced Relativity Hell. :-)
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Cecil Moore wrote:

...
Entangled particles may be a tunneling of sorts through
space-time. It has been proved to my satisfaction that
reality is non-local.

You are open minded Cecil, that appeals to me, some it doesn't. If
there is something new, or even the possibility of something new--I'll
be there ...

Regards,
JS

Mike Kaliski wrote:

...
If optical photons can tunnel through opaque materials, then why not radio
frequency photons? ...

You just can't pose a better question than that, it escapes me how
anyone can find fault with such a question(s).

Once we deal with the problem of rf waves appearing both as waves and
photons and get our minds wrapped around how this is (truly understand
rf), interesting things could happen.

Regards,
JS