Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 6, 3:17 pm, "Green Xenon [Radium]"
wrote: On Oct 6, 6:24 am, "George Dishman" wrote inhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.energy/msg/ad14e4c2d56369db: "Green Xenon [Radium]" wrote in om... ... ... This receiver also has a robust signal processor that can eliminate clipped-waveforms [such as square waves], spikes, clicks, pops, hiss, and random noise even at those trivial wattage levels. After eliminating those unwanted signals, the carrier wave is amplified. There is no carrier, Yes there is. Why do you say there isn't? Certain waveforms in the carrier wave that would cause the modulator signal to contain clipped-waveforms [such as square waves], spikes, clicks, pops, hiss, and random noise are removed. However, the remainder of the carrier-wave remains unscathed. it was one of those signals you just eliminated. How so? If I am on this spaceship, what will I most likely hear on the radio? Stop trying to troll, you are too stupid to pull it off. I don't troll or spam. I am asking this question because -- unlikely [if not impossible] as my 2-GHz-in-outer-space scenario is -- I am still interested in it. Now please please please answer my question. What would I hear? I chose 2 GHz because it is in the UHF band. UHFs tend to be best for extremely long distance reception. Of the radio waves emitted by objects trillions of miles -- or more -- away, UHF is usually the most receivable. Why do you say that "UHFs tend to the best for extremely long distance reception"? Have a look at the basic equation governing line-of-sight reception. Why do you not answer your own question? It sounds to me like as reasonable a premise for a science fiction book as many that have been successful. You could perhaps spin it into quite an interesting story. You've already started with a premise that's so far from -- so very, very far from -- the current realities or even the dreams of people designing receivers that you may as well suppose you're going to receive whatever your wildest imagination might come up with. Since there is a nearly countless number of stars in the known universe, and since a large percentage of them could be planetary systems, each with the possibility of emitting interesting amplitude modulated carriers, your choices are pretty near limitless. Wow! Let your imagination run wild. It obviously did when you posed the question; you may as well let it run as wild with the answer. Back to you, Nonex! Oh, and by the way, "spamming" comes, in one form, from posting too many places; I've trimmed off a whole bunch of groups for this reply. By my way of thinking, you're being pretty generous with yourself saying you don't spam. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Receiving 2 GHz AM signals in space. What do they sound like? | Antenna | |||
Receiving VMS (Vessel Monitoring Signals) from Inmarsat-C | General |