Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello,
Have a scanner in which I listen from 25 MHz or so up thru the vhf and uhf scanner frequencies of 1.3 GHz. Presently, one desktop scanner connected full time to one Scantenna in attic. Will be buying a handheld scanner, which I will be using (when not being used in a mobile mode) in probably one of three other rooms in house. I would like to connect a new antenna in the attic also, but have coax brought split out to the three rooms as ports for the handheld to be plugged into. Only one of the three ports will ever be used at any time. a. Do I need a "Coupler" between the three branches from the new antenna's feed ? b. If not, will the two Unused ports need to be terminated, or is just hanging open fine ? c. Anything else I should probably be asking about this proposed setup ? Thanks, Bob |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 13, 1:39 pm, "Robert11" wrote:
Hello, Have a scanner in which I listen from 25 MHz or so up thru the vhf and uhf scanner frequencies of 1.3 GHz. Presently, one desktop scanner connected full time to one Scantenna in attic. Will be buying a handheld scanner, which I will be using (when not being used in a mobile mode) in probably one of three other rooms in house. I would like to connect a new antenna in the attic also, but have coax brought split out to the three rooms as ports for the handheld to be plugged into. Only one of the three ports will ever be used at any time. a. Do I need a "Coupler" between the three branches from the new antenna's feed ? b. If not, will the two Unused ports need to be terminated, or is just hanging open fine ? c. Anything else I should probably be asking about this proposed setup ? Thanks, Bob At least a splitter that provides some isolation among the ports is a good idea. If you just parallel three terminated lines and connect them to antenna output, you'll have some mismatch loss--6dB worth. And if you forget to terminate one or both unused lines, they'll put lots of nulls in the frequency response. A splitter won't give you a whole lot more signal, since 2/3 of the power goes to the terminated lines: you have a loss of 4.8dB in the ideal case. A couple of other options: get an amplifier with three outputs; it's possible to have very good isolation if the amplifier is done right. Or...run the cable "daisy-chain" fashion, with a little jumper in the first two rooms. Remove the jumper and connect to the antenna feed if you want access in that room. Don't need to worry about terminations that way, just jumpers. Cable loss starts to add up, especially on UHF, but if the runs aren't too long, it probably beats the loss of a splitter. Cheers, Tom |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Using Twin Lead or Ladder Line for your Antenna's Feed-in-Line ? - Then 'consider' a Pair of Vintage Style TV Antenna Clips . . . | Shortwave | |||
LIve scanner feed | Shortwave | |||
Live scanner feed | Scanner | |||
New scanner feed on line. . | Scanner | |||
LAPD live scanner feed | Scanner |