Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Lux wrote in
: .... And, really, what precision do you need for pointing/plotting? Presumably folks are looking at fairly wide beamwidths (so that the sun size (1/2degree) is a small fraction of the beamwidth) 5 degrees? 1 degree? Jim, I suggested in my article that the Sun technique was most suited for beamwidths down to about 3 deg. As you have noted, there are a large number of other factors that become relevant at small beamwidths, and the most significant I think is the beamwidth correction factor to account for the Sun's departure from being close to a point source, then as you note the frequency dependent diameter of the radio Sun and the distribution of the Sun's intensity. So, down to 3 deg, the macros and formulae in my spreadsheet should be more than adequate. My thinking was that if you have a narrower antenna beamwidth, you probably have sufficiently high G/T to use one of the radio stars which will have much lower diameter. Owen |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Antenna Pattern Distortion due to 2 antenna placed in near vicinity | Antenna | |||
distortion of the antenna pattern | Antenna | |||
Antenna pattern from two antennas | Antenna | |||
Antenna Pattern Shaping | Antenna | |||
Antenna down tilt in pattern | Antenna |