Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#151
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Art wrote:
"---Joules are not necessarily accelerating." True. Terman says: "Radio waves are produced to some extent whenever a wire in open space carries a high-frequency current." Kraus says: "Thus, time-changing current radiates and acceleerated charge radiates." A joule is a unit of work or energy in the MKS system. A joule is the quantity of energy needed to transport one coulomb of charge between two points of one volt potential difference. Incidentally, "average power" is the kind of power we ordinarily use. Radio waves as Terman uses above are of the energy which escapes from the near field of the wire and is unlikekly to be recaptured by the wire. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#152
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
K7ITM wrote:
On Nov 2, 9:54 pm, K7ITM wrote: On Nov 2, 3:58 pm, Cecil Moore wrote: Do you know of any way to achieve wave cancellation without any interaction between the waves? It's called "vector addition," not "interaction." A bit more on the lack of "interaction" between two waves... A bit more on the "interaction" between two waves... From "Optics", by Hecht: "Briefly then, optical interference corresponds to the *interaction* of two or more light waves yielding a resultant irradiance that deviates from the sum of the component irradiances." (emphasis mine) Since the "interaction" between two waves is good enough for Hecht, it is good enough for me. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#153
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
K7ITM wrote: On Nov 2, 9:54 pm, K7ITM wrote: On Nov 2, 3:58 pm, Cecil Moore wrote: Do you know of any way to achieve wave cancellation without any interaction between the waves? It's called "vector addition," not "interaction." A bit more on the lack of "interaction" between two waves... A bit more on the "interaction" between two waves... From "Optics", by Hecht: "Briefly then, optical interference corresponds to the *interaction* of two or more light waves yielding a resultant irradiance that deviates from the sum of the component irradiances." (emphasis mine) Since the "interaction" between two waves is good enough for Hecht, it is good enough for me. Gimme that old time religion... 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH |
#154
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Donaly wrote:
Since the "interaction" between two waves is good enough for Hecht, it is good enough for me. Gimme that old time religion... Please take your objection up with Eugene Hecht. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|