Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #201   Report Post  
Old December 1st 07, 09:31 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,521
Default Superposition

mike3 wrote:
You are wrong too. He CAN "possibly" understand them, he does
not WANT to.


Sorry Mike, that is a lie. I sincerely want to
understand because that is the only way I can
learn. Nobody has offered any actual proof that
I am wrong. The absence of technical content of
your posting is prima facie evidence of the
ulterior motives in action here. Nice try at
obfuscation, but it doesn't work on intelligent,
knowledgeable people.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com
  #202   Report Post  
Old December 1st 07, 09:45 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,521
Default Superposition

Tom Donaly wrote:
So, an attack on one part of mathematical theory is an attack
on all mathematics? I like your vigorous defense of mathematics,
but I think you missed the point.


In rejecting the concept of the total number of natural numbers,
you have rejected most of all mathematics. Cave men probably
used stones to count the days as they passed. In rejecting
the concept of the ultimate number of days possible, you
reject the concept of a single day, i.e. you reject reality
and therefore condemn the human race to pre-caveman days.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com
  #203   Report Post  
Old December 2nd 07, 12:37 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 274
Default Superposition

Cecil Moore wrote:
Tom Donaly wrote:
So, an attack on one part of mathematical theory is an attack
on all mathematics? I like your vigorous defense of mathematics,
but I think you missed the point.


In rejecting the concept of the total number of natural numbers,
you have rejected most of all mathematics...


How would you know?
73,
KA6RUH
  #204   Report Post  
Old December 2nd 07, 09:07 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,521
Default Superposition

Tom Donaly wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
In rejecting the concept of the total number of natural numbers,
you have rejected most of all mathematics...


How would you know?


I have a major in mathematics which included a
"Foundations of Mathematics" graduate course.
I had my choice of a degree in EE or Math.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com
  #205   Report Post  
Old December 2nd 07, 10:50 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,521
Default Superposition

Jimmie D wrote:
"Cecil Moore" wrote:
Would you mind providing a reference that says that the
delay through a 2" dia, 100T, 10" long coil can possibly
be 3 ns?


I can think of one condition where that may well be true.


The context was a 4 MHz sine wave signal. Do you know
of any 3 ns delays through a 100T coil at 4 MHz?
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is the Superposition Principle invalid? Cecil Moore[_2_] Antenna 58 April 4th 07 07:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017