Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... James Barrett wrote: I tried using the demo version of EZNEC, but haven't figured it out yet. Time to diagnose that problem. :-) Anyways, I'm not sure yet what to expect as far as making contacts. At this low of the sunspot cycle, don't "expect" anything above 14.35 MHz to work. :-) 40m CW is my favorite band right now. Ok, having said all of that, I have some ideas for shorter dipoles that can hang north/south. So there is much experimenting in my future. :-D Hang your long dipole E/W. Hang another dipole in parallel N/S as long as you can make it. Use an antenna tuner. Enjoy, i.e. put something in the air and be patient. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com I think you made a typo error "Hang your long dipole E/W. Hang another dipole in parallel N/S"?? How can 1 wire be E/W and another be parallel N/S ???????? 73, Howard W3CQH |
#42
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Doe wrote:
I think you made a typo error "Hang your long dipole E/W. Hang another dipole in parallel N/S"?? How can 1 wire be E/W and another be parallel N/S ???????? No problem. Ever heard of a fan dipole? Run 130 feet east and west and run 60 feet (or whatever) north and south. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#43
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:35:14 -0800, Richard Clark wrote:
Better to back off from my 5 and instead consider: http://home.comcast.net/~kb7qhc/ante.../Cage/cage.htm which comes to the same thing, but not at the expense of forever re-tuning each wire by band. Hi Richard, Was this antenna ever built? -73 de Mike N3LI - |
#44
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 17:46:56 -0600, Mike Coslo
wrote: On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:35:14 -0800, Richard Clark wrote: Better to back off from my 5 and instead consider: http://home.comcast.net/~kb7qhc/ante.../Cage/cage.htm which comes to the same thing, but not at the expense of forever re-tuning each wire by band. Hi Richard, Was this antenna ever built? Hi Mike, I built a vertical dipole version of it, but it didn't have enough wires in the skeleton (6 not 16) to justify keeping it up. A similar study of the discone at: http://www.qsl.net/kb7qhc/antenna/Discone/discone.htm reveals that geometery as well as fullness of the skeleton makes considerable differences in performance. I did a field day version of this with 8 wires, and it too showed a lot of bare patches. As I said, a lot of wire.... 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#45
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
... http://www.qsl.net/kb7qhc/antenna/Discone/discone.htm ... 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Giving credit, where credit is due, nice contribution. It has taken the discone 30+ years to become "accepted", it does have unique uses ... your previous post containing the .ez file for the broadband "fat antenna" was also greatly enjoyed here. THANKS! Warm regards, JS |
#46
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 21:14:21 -0800, John Smith
wrote: your previous post containing the .ez file for the broadband "fat antenna" was also greatly enjoyed here. THANKS! Any of my designs is freely available for the asking if they don't have access by a link. Not many ask for the fractals.... (Talk about a lot of wire!) If other's find this allusion cryptic, consider the Koch Quadratic at 20M: http://www.qsl.net/kb7qhc/antenna/fr...%20Antenna.gif being 3.25 dB better than a quarterwave vertical: http://www.qsl.net/kb7qhc/antenna/fr...on%20Lobes.gif The Vincent antennas compare miserably both in performance and visual appeal (and I never had to use the word Gauss once to explain them). As for other wideband antennas (examples will require scaling, and this ups the ante in wire to where you would have to mortgage your house to buy the copper): http://www.qsl.net/kb7qhc/antenna/fr...omparisons.htm 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#47
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... Sal M. Onella wrote: ... and it does for me on 20 and 10. I don't know how many sets of dipole elements can be connected at the same time, but I think it's more than the two I have up there now. Richard gave the number five. That's why I said I'm going to try a set for 40m. A fan dipole with elements for 40m and 15m doesn't work well because of the resonant interaction between those two elements of 0.5WL and 1.5WL. Most hams I know use the 40m dipole also for 15m operation with a tuner. I don't seem to hear much on 15 and I've only made one contact on that band. That was with a tuner on a non-resonant antenna. I don't plan to have elements for 15, so I may have no issues. Thanks for the cautionary note. "Sal" (KD6VKW) |
#48
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Smith wrote:
Giving credit, where credit is due, nice contribution. One thing that may be lost in the shuffle on this newsgroup is that a lot of people make outstanding contributions to our hobby. The problem arises when someone starts to worship himself as some God's gift to amateur radio. Those people know who they are. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#49
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
John Smith wrote: Giving credit, where credit is due, nice contribution. One thing that may be lost in the shuffle on this newsgroup is that a lot of people make outstanding contributions to our hobby. The problem arises when someone starts to worship himself as some God's gift to amateur radio. Those people know who they are. Yes Cecil, sometimes we become so involved in "friendly debate/exploration" that we forget the "sound" of our words, well, at least I do. It'll all work out. :-D Any good story/drama has an antagonist and a protagonist--heck, the world is a stage and we must all play our parts ... or, thank gawd for problems! Regards, JS |
#50
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:59:03 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote: The problem arises when someone starts to worship himself as some God's gift to amateur radio. Those people know who they are. Cecileo, forgive us for failing to recognize your great contributions to humanity, but I am more concerned about my chances of losing your salvation by knowing the others of who "they" are. Is this the god-head? Are you attended by the holy RF Ghost? Is it a reflection of your glory? If so, what is the phase angle and what discontinuity did you hit when this reflection occurred? Do you and this reflection exist independently, or is either of you bound to disappear in less than a half cycle? Is heaven like a lossless quarterwave shorted transmission line? So many questions, and MORE, that I am sure would be answered if you simple posted your URL to your scriptures. best wishes, with devotion, inspired by your example, full faith and true to your teachings, ever humble and groveling at your magnificence so long misunderstood, I remain anonymous so as to not profane this thread any longer. thank you, thank you, please hear my prayers, thank you. p.s. write when you find work. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA - MFJ-941E Tuner with Ten-Tec Dummy Load | Equipment | |||
FA - MFJ-941E Tuner with Ten-Tec Dummy Load | Swap | |||
FA: MFJ-941E Antenna Tuner | Swap | |||
FA: $12.00 PALOMAR PT-340 "TUNER TUNER" HELPS TUNE YOUR TUNER | Equipment | |||
FA: $12.00 PALOMAR PT-340 "TUNER TUNER" HELPS TUNE YOUR TUNER | Equipment |