Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That was it. There is a 2" aluminum tube over a 1 1/4" stainless steel
"jackshaft". It's held with two 1/4" bolts. Holes thru aluminum tube were elongated. Drilled to 3/8". Unfortunately, these aren't perfectly round, either, since I drilled 'em with a hand drill, but I'm hoping the torque I put on the 3/8" bolts will crush the aluminum tube into clamping on the stainless steel. We'll see. If not, I can drill more holes thru that assembly and put more bolts in. It seemed more solid, but next big wind, I'll have a look. Thanks again for the tip. Dave Head On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 14:46:54 -0600, "Crazy George" wrote: Dave: From that description, I suspect you are going to find all the bolt holes in the tubing elongated from torque. We usually drill slightly oversize holes for our fasteners, but in this high stress application, the holes should start undersize so the fasteners have to be driven in and are tight from the get-go. Also, it is necessary to select fasteners which do not have threads where they pass through the walls of the tubes. This is often the most difficult challenge. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave:
I've forgotten the exact construction you described, but I suspect you are going to have to increase the friction between the two tubes by splitting and clamping the outer. It sounds like the aluminum is simply too thin and too soft to withstand that kind of torque against a small diameter fastener. -- Crazy George Remove N O and S P A M imbedded in return address "Dave Head" wrote in message ... That was it. There is a 2" aluminum tube over a 1 1/4" stainless steel "jackshaft". It's held with two 1/4" bolts. Holes thru aluminum tube were elongated. Drilled to 3/8". Unfortunately, these aren't perfectly round, either, since I drilled 'em with a hand drill, but I'm hoping the torque I put on the 3/8" bolts will crush the aluminum tube into clamping on the stainless steel. We'll see. If not, I can drill more holes thru that assembly and put more bolts in. It seemed more solid, but next big wind, I'll have a look. Thanks again for the tip. Dave Head On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 14:46:54 -0600, "Crazy George" wrote: Dave: From that description, I suspect you are going to find all the bolt holes in the tubing elongated from torque. We usually drill slightly oversize holes for our fasteners, but in this high stress application, the holes should start undersize so the fasteners have to be driven in and are tight from the get-go. Also, it is necessary to select fasteners which do not have threads where they pass through the walls of the tubes. This is often the most difficult challenge. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 20:10:56 -0600, "Crazy George"
wrote: Dave: I've forgotten the exact construction you described, but I suspect you are going to have to increase the friction between the two tubes by splitting and clamping the outer. It sounds like the aluminum is simply too thin and too soft to withstand that kind of torque against a small diameter fastener. Hi George, I took the antenna down last weekend (layed it over using the screw operated hinge base) and, after considering a few alternatives, and trying one unsuccessfully (new bolt hole - broke off bit), I drilled out the 2 1/4" bolt holes already there that were holding the hollow mast to the stainless steel shaft to 3/8". Installed 2 3/8" bolts and tightened them down very tightly. We've got a moderate wind right now, and the antenna is doing about 5 degrees of swing, so i think it helped. Will probably tilt it over in a couple weeks, drill some more 3/8" holes, and tighten them down smartly as well. BTW, for anyone with a quad that has "hose clamp" construction to hold the spreaders, it pays to retighten them. Nearly all of mine were stretched, and this antenna hasn't been up all that long - a few months. Dave Head K8DH |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
BTW, Dave: If you ever do disassemble that tubing over tubing joint, put a
solid block of something inside where the bolts go through. No tubing is strong enough to resist collapse when you tighten the through bolts enough. -- Crazy George Remove N O and S P A M imbedded in return address "Dave Head" wrote in message ... snip We've got a moderate wind right now, and the antenna is doing about 5 degrees of swing, so i think it helped. Will probably tilt it over in a couple weeks, drill some more 3/8" holes, and tighten them down smartly as well. BTW, for anyone with a quad that has "hose clamp" construction to hold the spreaders, it pays to retighten them. Nearly all of mine were stretched, and this antenna hasn't been up all that long - a few months. Dave Head K8DH |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 20:24:59 -0600, "Crazy George"
wrote: BTW, Dave: If you ever do disassemble that tubing over tubing joint, put a solid block of something inside where the bolts go through. No tubing is strong enough to resist collapse when you tighten the through bolts enough. Hi George, No, its tubing over a solid steel shaft. The shaft isn't going to deform. The (aluminum) tubing, which is the 2" mast for the antenna, _will_ deform sufficiently to clamp onto the SS shaft. That seems to be retarding the excessive swinging in the wind now, but I think it might be made somewhat better. A couple more 3/8" bolts, in a couple new holes thru the assembly should help, I think. Dave Head |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |