art wrote:
On 8 Jan, 17:57, John Smith wrote:
art wrote:
...
http://www.sensormag.com/articles/0301/30/main.shtml
Hopefully this url will get you to what I want you to read.
Art Unwin.....KB9MZ.....XG (uk)
I would be more than willing to read it, as with most, however, that
page, in my browser, results in an 404 error (page not found) and a
redirect to this page:

http://www.motionnet.com/

Which is a rip off ...

Regards,
JS

I'm sorry. I did the best I could. I am not computor savvy as you are
Again apologies
Art

No problem Art, perhaps my browser has been hijacked?

I was just hoping you could provide a link which would present the page
to me. I will download "hijack this" and search for
spyware/malware/trojans/etc., in the meantime ...

Warm regards,
JS

art wrote:
....
http://www.sensormag.com/articles/0301/30/main.shtml

try
http://www.sensorsmag.com/articles/0301/30/main.shtml

gwatts wrote:
art wrote:
...
http://www.sensormag.com/articles/0301/30/main.shtml

try
http://www.sensorsmag.com/articles/0301/30/main.shtml

Thanks gwatts--that does it!

Regards,
JS

"gwatts" wrote in message
...
art wrote:
...
http://www.sensormag.com/articles/0301/30/main.shtml

try
http://www.sensorsmag.com/articles/0301/30/main.shtml

and just what does that page have to do with em waves?

Dave wrote:

...
and just what does that page have to do with em waves?



Hmmm, maybe better to ask, "What does electro-magnetism have to do with
magnetic fields"--you will get more answers ... sounds like you know
what you are speaking about, also.

JS

John Smith wrote:
art wrote:

...
Art

When I fire up my rig, the one composed of an electric motor
(constructed with recovered metal from the Roswell crash) spinning at
1,000,000 R.P.S., with the neodymium magnet attached to the shaft--what
do you thing the wave(s) look like? How are protons being released from
the static field of the magnets poles? Can't the need for a media
(properties of which are unknown/unexplored) which can be "excited" be
easily visualized?

Warm regards,
JS

OK. Let me go further then. If I were to allow "speculation" on the
existence of the ether--than I could further expand this "speculation"
to allow for a "lag" in the ether--and "to" that of the spinning
magnetic fields--and, if such "speculation" were allowed, then going one
step further would allow for the possibility of the "deformation" of the
"wave" thus generated by such a "lag" ...

Regards,
JS

AI4QJ wrote:
"art" wrote in message
...
I just looked the above title up on Google
Guess what! They show a graph of the magnetic wave
in a tipped manner which is exactly what computor programs show for a
radiator
in equilibrium. Shades of a diamagnetic field no less, which is not
the same as one seen when one uses non diamagnetic iron filings when
in junior high school.
These search engines are great since the evidence keeps piling up
where sooner or later the dam is going to break.Remember that guy who
came along with a NEC program that confirmed the tipped radiator. No
body challenged the results of NEC even when it opposed existing book
text! Why? They did not want to suggest that the books were in error
and thus would not debate the reults given independently.
Art

The casual reader of the ng should realize that this insane posting is not
representative of the technical background of ham radio operators.



Nor are the posts of AI4QJ.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH

"AI4QJ" wrote in message
...

"Tom Donaly" wrote in message
. ..
AI4QJ wrote:
"art" wrote in message
...
I just looked the above title up on Google
Guess what! They show a graph of the magnetic wave
in a tipped manner which is exactly what computor programs show for a
radiator
in equilibrium. Shades of a diamagnetic field no less, which is not
the same as one seen when one uses non diamagnetic iron filings when
in junior high school.
These search engines are great since the evidence keeps piling up
where sooner or later the dam is going to break.Remember that guy who
came along with a NEC program that confirmed the tipped radiator. No
body challenged the results of NEC even when it opposed existing book
text! Why? They did not want to suggest that the books were in error
and thus would not debate the reults given independently.
Art

The casual reader of the ng should realize that this insane posting is
not representative of the technical background of ham radio operators.

Nor are the posts of AI4QJ.

plonk


at least ai4qj recognizes pure bs when he sees it.

On 18 Jan, 04:58, "Dave" wrote:
"AI4QJ" wrote in message

...







"Tom Donaly" wrote in message
...
AI4QJ wrote:
"art" wrote in message
...
I just looked the above title up on Google
Guess what! They show a graph of the magnetic wave
in a tipped manner which is exactly what computor programs show for a
radiator
in equilibrium. Shades of a diamagnetic field no less, which is not
the same as one seen when one uses non diamagnetic iron filings when
in junior high school.
These search engines are great since the evidence keeps piling up
where sooner or later the dam is going to break.Remember that guy who
came along with a NEC program that confirmed the tipped radiator. No
body challenged the results of NEC even when it opposed existing book
text! Why? They did not want to suggest that the books were in error
and thus would not debate the reults given independently.
Art

The casual reader of the ng should realize that this insane posting is
not representative of the technical background of ham radio operators.

Nor are the posts of AI4QJ.

plonk

at least ai4qj recognizes pure bs when he sees it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

David, your denial of the mathematics of adding a time varying field
to Gaussian law to make it equal to Maxwell's laws doesn't make it
change. The mathematics is there, but since you can't handle integrals
you chose to deny it and accuse others of poor mathematics.I don't
know where you got your mathematics teachings other than it was
probably in the U.S.Let me assure you once again, the mathematics is
sound, the doctor from MIT made the mathematical steps very clear to
all on the group yet this group, including you, denied the integrity
of the math.
The results from new math is inherrently the same as old mathematics
and your BS does not cancel that fact, even tho the group followed you
into that same pit.
Have a happy day.
Art Unwin KB9MZ..XG (uk)