I was wondering if it's possible to shorten the radials from the standard
1/4 wavelength to another value, a smaller one. For example, in a 20 meters
antenna, which is the best value of length for shortened radials or, in
alternative, until which value is possible to go to without superlosses?
Thanks in advance

E il marconista sulla sua torre,
le lunghe dita celesti nell'aria,
riceveva messaggi d'auguri
per questa crociera straordinaria.
E trasmetteva saluti e speranze
in quasi tutte le lingue del mondo,
comunicava tra Vienna e Chicago
in poco meno di un secondo.
E la ragazza di prima classe, innamorata del proprio cappello,
quando la sera lo vide ballare lo trovò subito molto bello.
Forse per via di quegli occhi di ghiaccio così difficili da evitare,
pensò "Magari con un po' di coraggio, prima dell'arrivo mi farò
baciare".

Francesco DeGregori

Francesco L. wrote:
I was wondering if it's possible to shorten the radials from the standard
1/4 wavelength to another value, a smaller one. For example, in a 20 meters
antenna, which is the best value of length for shortened radials or, in
alternative, until which value is possible to go to without superlosses?

If radials are buried, their velocity factors may be
something in the ballpark of 0.5. That's certainly a
shortening effect.

With elevated radials, the radials can be shortened
and the vertical element lengthened to maintain
resonance. Radials can also be shortened by loading
each radial with a coil.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Francesco L. wrote:
I was wondering if it's possible to shorten the radials from the standard
1/4 wavelength to another value, a smaller one. For example, in a 20 meters
antenna, which is the best value of length for shortened radials or, in
alternative, until which value is possible to go to without superlosses?
Thanks in advance
===============================
It is my understanding that when radials are on the ground or buried
,their length can be any hence also shorter than 1/4 wavelength ,but
when very they are very short ,more of the same will give an improvement
especially when on dry ground.
When radials are above ground like when part of a vertical antenna
system fitted on a roof the quarter wave radial(s) ,at least 1 for each
band , are required ,since then they are 'the other half' of a dipole.

On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:54:37 +0100, "Francesco L."
wrote:

I was wondering if it's possible to shorten the radials from the standard
1/4 wavelength to another value, a smaller one. For example, in a 20 meters
antenna, which is the best value of length for shortened radials or, in
alternative, until which value is possible to go to without superlosses?
Thanks in advance

Hi Francesco,

On the ground, or elevated?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Hi Francesco,

On the ground, or elevated?

Both cases please. I did a reasearch on arrl antenna book, low band dxing
and newsgroups and got a bit confused, so I need more tips. There are too
many options, I mean: at a certain height above the ground, atop the roof,
on the ground and so on, so I'm trying to collect as much info as possible
in order to get the overall picture.
Thanks

On 24 feb, 15:15, "Francesco L." wrote:
Hi Francesco,

On the ground, or elevated?

Both cases please. I did a reasearch on arrl antenna book, low band dxing
and newsgroups and got a bit confused, so I need more tips. There are too
many options, I mean: at a certain height above the ground, atop the roof,
on the ground and so on, so I'm trying to collect as much info as possible
in order to get the overall picture.
Thanks

Hello Francesco,

It depends heavily on the antenna. When your antenna is an
electrically half wave radiator, the input impedance is in the kOhm
range and "ground" becomes less important. Many CB 27 MHz antennas are
half wave antennas (without any radials). For other lengths, "ground"
is important.

The smaller your antenna the lower the radiation resistance (=higher
feed current), and the more important the "ground" system.

For fertile wet ground and buried radials, the 0.25lambda is no longer
a magic number as the attenuation is very high. For dry Rock/sand,
dielectric properties dictate and some standing waves appear in the
ground conductor. As long as the real part of the ground impedance
is less then the real part of the input impedance of the radiator, it
is OK.

If possible, I prefer elevated radials. In many cases, they can be
shorter than 0.25 lambda (add more of them). The disadvantage is that
your floating ground becomes capacitive and you get a common mode
voltage on the cable screen, so you should add a common mode choke.
When you make them very short, the electrical situation is upside
down: your radiator functions as ground and your floating radial
network is the antenna.

An advantage of floating radials and the high end of HF is that your
radiation center is higher and ground properties become less
important, so you can have less loss (also in nearby structures) and
less noise from electrical equipment.

To give a more precise answer, one need to know your local conditions,
structural limitations, frequency and antenna type to be used, etc.
For low frequency, "Ground systems as a factor in antenna
systems" (Brown, Lewis Epstein, 1937) maybe interesting for you in
case of buried radials.

I know this doesn't answer your question, but I hope it will help you
a bit.

Best regards,


Wim
PA3DJS
www.tetech.nl (Dutch).

On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:15:34 +0100, "Francesco L."
wrote:

Hi Francesco,

On the ground, or elevated?

Both cases please. I did a reasearch on arrl antenna book, low band dxing
and newsgroups and got a bit confused, so I need more tips. There are too
many options, I mean: at a certain height above the ground, atop the roof,
on the ground and so on, so I'm trying to collect as much info as possible
in order to get the overall picture.
Thanks

Hi Francesco,

In the air:
You are going to need a tuner for a standard height antenna with
shorter radials. Instead, you can try adding loading coils to each
radial (about midpoint). This will take experimentation to achieve
resonance. So plan on putting it up and taking it down many times.
You will also need a good choke at the feed point (aka 1:1 W2DU
BalUn); and another one a quarter wave down the line. Some who report
here say you will need more radials the lower the antenna is, and the
closer to ground.

On the ground:
As many small radials as you can make, as long as the radiator. If
that is too long (will not fit in garden), then simply fill the area
you can. "Fill?" For argument's sake (a starting point) a dozen or
more 0.1 wavelength radials. If this is too long, increase the count
and make them the maximum length you can.

Read Wim's advice for halfwave radiators. They have the reputation of
being ground free, but it will ease tuning if you build some radials -
whatever length, whatever count (not critical). If you don't build
these; then matching becomes a function of line placement. If the
line changes, so does the match.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

I believe other folks have mentioned that when the radials are buried,
no specific length is required for the antenna to be resonant. The more
radials you use and the longer they are, the lower the loss. There's a
point of diminishing returns for both length and number, and it turns
out that if you have only a few radials, making them very long doesn't
help much.

Elevated radials normally have to be close to a quarter wavelength long
for resonance unless they're very close to the ground in which case they
need to be somewhat shorter. You can use the same techniques to shorten
elevated radials, though, as you do a vertical radiating element. You
can add a loading inductance at the feedpoint or farther along each
radial, you can use a capacitive "hat" at the end, or some combination
of the two. And just as happens with loaded verticals, the result will
be narrower bandwidth, lower feedpoint resistance at resonance, and
potentially higher loss.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

Thanks to all!
ik8vwa

Francesco L. wrote:
"I was wondering if it`s possible to shorten the radials from the
standard 1/4 wavelength to another value, a smaller one."

Elevated radials are resonant, but the 20th edition of the ARRL Antenna
Book has Fig 47 on page 6-26 showing radials shortened by capacitive or
inductive loading.

Buried radials have their resonance swamped by earth conductance. Such
radials are surely effective when the greatest current drops nearly to
zero at the ends, farthest from the vertical radiator, No
interconnections far from the origins of the radials are desirable as
they only encourage circulating current which only adds to loss.

E.A. Laport has Figs. 217 and 218 on page 119 of "Radio Antenna
Engineering" taken from Brown, Lewis, and Epstein which show field
strength variies versus 2, 15, 30, 60, or 113 ground radials of 0.412 or
0.137 lambda, at antenna heights up to 100 degrees, so that you can see
what the shorter radials cost you.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI